tvc184

Swing pass for 4 2-6 end of 1, 7-7

Kickoff returned to near Dayton 30, then fumbled to Nederland. 1-10 Nederland at Dayton 27. 1-10

At 0:11 in 1, 7-7

Hit near line and carried defenders for 10. 1-10 55 yard touchdown run.

Kickoff returned to Nederland 35. 1-10

At 1:01 in 1, Dayton 7-0

Holding Dayton on run. 2-20 20 touchdown pass and run.

P to Nederland 10. 1-goal

Motion Dayton 1-15 Sack -2. 2-17

R6. 1-10

P9. 2-1 qb draw forr 1/2 yard. 3-1 fumble recovered by Dayton. 4-1 Timeout Nederland 2:48 in 1st. 0-0, Dayton at Nederland 35

Sweep right for 5. 2-5 sweep right for 3. 3-2 R4. 1-10

Pass intercepted. Dayton 1-10 at own 44

R3. 2-7 6:00 in 1, 0-0

R19. 1-10

Punt for 21. 1-10 Nederland at own 26

Swing pass for 5. 2-5 R0. 3-5 P incomplete 4-5

Punt for 19 yards. 1-10 Dayton at own 48

False start. 1-15 swing pass no good. 2-15 P6. 3-9 Sack -9. 4-18

Nederland takes kickoff to own 24. 1-10 R1. 2-9 P8. 3-1 R2 1-10

What I see is they take bits and pieces of it and place it where it doesn't belong. It is like maybe the truth under a different circumstance. A person will take a sentence out of one law and place it with a section from another and come up with his own law.

I thought the grand jury could have come indicted him for Manslaughter. The only difference is that Criminal Negligent Homicide requires proving that he acted negligently and Manslaughter requires proving that he acted recklessly.

TX law does not require him to be in danger. TX law does allow the use of deadly force if he reasonably believes that there is a robbery and the person(s) is getting away with the property even if it is not his own What he did was probably legal except that TX law specifically states that there is no protection from prosecution if an innocent person was hit. In this case an innocent person was hit.

This case also came up this week and results in no indictment. [Hidden Content]

I have been waiting for this case to go to the grand jury so I could see what someone thinks of it. [Hidden Content]