BelichikYoSelf

agreed

negative. Not jealous at all. "If he grew since then" is laughable. He was pretty large early in season. And he didnt weigh in "just like everyone else on the same scale". He weighed seperate from his team on a different day. I know weird huh. Have a photo of him standing next to a confirmed 135 lb kid. Guess who was the much larger kid. Thicker and good 4 - 5 inches taller. It s ok. Ya ll are only one of about 3 teams in Jr. Playing kids out of position. And Im sure all teams would like a tall 145 lb QB running the ball. Thats a great point you made buddy.

Well then i guess its time to ruffle a few feathers. This season is Definitely ready for an Upset Saturday. No real upset with PNG W vs LUM R other than the score. PNG W win big 35-6 OF vs BC R OF is too much for BC no upset here 31-0 OF PNG P vs NED B here s one. (PNG P 7 NED B 6)missed FG off left upright Bummer BMT B vs NED W. (NED W 42 BMT B 21) easy money book it. LUM W vs KTZ (LUM W 31 KTZ 0) Too much for an upset. BC W vs VID B (VID B 28 BC W 6) VID B Snags first win VID W vs PTA (VID W wins 1-0) forfiet for PTA breaking the SPIRIT of the rule LCM vs WOS B toss up (LCM 21 WOS B 20) 145 lb QB proves to be too much for WOS B on an extra point try JAS vs BMT W (JAS 8 BMT W 6) revenge for stealing their QB. PNG G vs BMT G (PNG G 28 BMT G 7) BMT G too predictable.

Dont know the Names Bradyb, but you need to look at number 17 and number 40 on OF jr team. Very solid. 17 s last name is Bodin. 2 of the best backs I ve seen in Jr this year and excellent tacklers on D. Ned W has a big fast back as well. Landon Caywood, dont know the number.

No mention of Lum W, OF, LCM or BMT W. These teams put NED B number 5 on the list of best in Jr. WOS B will prove that Saturday.

Whoa. Nice win for Ned B. Guess they are making a case for the unstoppable crew they claim to be...

Yes they should be penalized for beating teams 60-0 with starters in the game. No reason for it. A few past coaches took the mercy rule and manipulated it. They essentially started subs and ran true starters majority of the game past the 28 pt mercy rule. The problem is when a team follows the mercy rule and a true sub scores or a defense scores on int. and punishments are still handed down. Add in the fact that coaches are unable to defend themselves and big mess ensues. Now the culture has changed a bit. A coach should be able to follow the rules and let the subs enjoy the game when the opportunity arises, especially in a rec league. Now teams have to intentially not score with subs getting their PT once up by 28 or risk breaking the Spirit of the rule, whatever that means. The Mercy Rule is a good rule but must be applied right. If a team has it s true subs in and still dominates the game then we should really blame the opposing coach for not teaching tackling instead of punishing subs for playing football. I have a bigger issue with stacked teams in Certain multiple team cities and weight limit manipulation. "BattlinBear" have you seen a very large QB in Jr.? I mean really large? One QB in particular is the biggest, thickest, tallest 110 lbs i ve ever seen. But dont worry Bear, Ive seen this in Lum on occassion in past seasons. Get on the 5 yard line a big lineman minus an LO sticker goes in at fullback to bowling ball up the middle. Those are the types of rules i would like to see some attention in a rec league such as stjfl.

LCM. LUM W. BMT B. NED W. WOS W. PNG P. PNG G OF JAS PNG W

Or missed blocks because OF couldnt be blocked, missed Tackles because OF ran hard and OF line blocked well and had Turnovers because OF caused turnovers.

Ned B has had a cake walk so far and it will continue this week. Real Test is week 4. If they hang or beat BMT B by more than 12 pts week 4, then I ll Join the (almost) unstop-able bandwagon. week 4 will tell the tale for them. They will still need to Beat Lum W either in or on the way to super bowl. Ned W has an easier road to the super bowl due to Conference and playoff schedule. We shall see.

Jr. And no they beat PNG W 35-6

Dont think you guys have watched BMT B. That is a very good team. Big, strong and fast. The LUM R game will be over before the half. But the other games appear to be called fair enough. We shall see...

That would be the right thing to do.  Consider it a record tie breaker with the points allowed instead of a head to head loss.  It technically is NOT a head to head loss as it stands with it going down as a forfeit.    

With all this Bmt drama in youth football, all I have really noticed on Fri nights is that the mid county boys top notch couch potato and video game training from their youth has been paying off.  Thank goodness none of them were out putting in "backyard time" with their dads as 9 and 10 year old superstars.  Jag, luvya, anklenibbler, and bugatti might want to change up the workout regimen.  Just throwing that out there for all the "we win by 60 + because we work hard and your chubby couch potatos don't," comments.    B)   

see ya

No excuses being made.  Just letting you know that Ned is now forced to cannibalize in the playoffs for playing some quality football with 1st 2nd and 3 rd string kids.  Count your blessing that you and ALL other less caliber teams have a chance at the super bowl.  If you are proud enough of the fact that Ned "broke the rules" and gave your team a shot at the bowl from a forfeit loss, then Congrats.  But Believing anything other than the FACT that Ned has the two most dominant team in Jr. is pretty funny.       

Exactly why the Ned vs Ned playoff game will have more butts in the seats than the rigged up superbowl.  Forfeit loss by a powerhouse lets you skate to the bowl without having to play one of the two best teams in the league.  YEP  well deserved.  Congrats. 

MY keyboard works just fine.  Nederland Sr. will win a convincing game against the gigantic PN P team Sat.  Big Brother PN W put it on Nederland Last weekend and I'm sure the Dawgs will want some kind of revenge. ;)   

I can't combat that point.  Well said.  I hate to have PN W brought up because they seem to be very conscious of controlling the score on weaker teams.     But for the purpose of the your game in question I see where you are coming from on this issue.    

The WR issue is addressed in every mandatory coaches meeting.  As it was this season.  In fact i believe this same Group of coaches are the reason it has been addressed the past few season.  The Mercy rule is a rule for a reason.  These caoches have Continuously used loop holes such as starting the MPR kids for a play or two making them the Now Starters of the game or putting their better runners as receivers to start a game.  Its only a way around the rule that they make clear every coaches meeting that will not be tolerated.     In other words, Play kids that are not legitimate threats to score every time they touch the ball because the game in currently out of hand and lopsided.  Its simple and well understood by everyone in the league.  Now if a true second stringer scores or the opposing team throws a pick 6 then things are different and should be viewed as a different situation.  But when you consciously put in a starter "WR" or higher end player after previously breaking rules of this same caliber, I say see ya good bye who cares.  And don't give us this junk about He was an assistant when the other violations were handed down.  Who cares, You know the rules and were apart of the other suspensions Everyone knows why the league has put the mercy rule in place.    

Cant wait for PN W to silence this Board.  The land of (future NFL 10 year olds) has gotten a bit more cranky than last season.  Karma doesn't play nice.  Easy Bmt peeps.  I'm quite sure PN W will treat you guys the same as Nederland and not hurt your feelings.  Nothing over 40 points.  Its only fair they play by the rules with you guys as well.    

:)  :)  :)  :)  :)  :) Now that is some flappin at its finest.  Looks like Lamar wants a repeat flappin trophy to go with PN W three Peat Superbowl trophy.     But i must say Bugatti has made an awesome counter bet to the t shirt offer.