WOSgrad

Okay, got the answer to my question. I got this from a side by sided on the UIL website ([Hidden Content]) On Page 10: "[b][i]5. Are students who are placed in alternative settings for behavioral management eligible for extracurricular activities?[/i][/b]  Students who are placed in a disciplinary alternative education program (DAEP) for a reason included in TEC §37.006 must be prohibited from attending or participating in a school-sponsored or schoolrelated activity as provided by Subsection (g) of that section. Students placed in a DAEP pursuant to authority under a provision of the TEC other than §37.006 may be prohibited from participating in school-sponsored or school-related activities by local district policies. Students who have been assigned to a DAEP for a reason included in TEC §37.006 or those assigned under a separate section of the TEC and prohibited from participating by local policy, may resume participation in UIL activities the first day they return to regular classes after completing the assigned length of time in the alternative education program."

While the trashing of school property should be punished, I am not sure how that rises to the level of a UIL infraction if the those involved played in the game.  That sounds like a student code of conduct issue and an internal district matter. I guess I will look at the rules and see what I can find.

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm