PN-G bamatex

Scalp 'em!

[quote name="BLUEDOVE3" post="1052820" timestamp="1315596411"] [quote author=PN-G bamakid link=topic=87540.msg1052816#msg1052816 date=1315596166] [quote author=BLUEDOVE3 link=topic=87540.msg1052806#msg1052806 date=1315595217] LOL! You Repubs are sneaky! Gotta watch you fellas. 80% of the poor had air conditioning. I bet 70% worked for what they owned. [/quote] Just 70%? Shouldn't the other 30% work for it as well? [/quote]Not in our type of system. The system is geared towards having the poor remain below a certain poverty level. [/quote] While I disagree with that point for the most part, I fail to see where that's relevant to the question.

[quote name="BLUEDOVE3" post="1052806" timestamp="1315595217"] LOL! You Repubs are sneaky! Gotta watch you fellas. 80% of the poor had air conditioning. I bet 70% worked for what they owned. [/quote] Just 70%? Shouldn't the other 30% work for it as well?

[quote name="thetragichippy" post="1052121" timestamp="1315518384"] [quote author=stevenash link=topic=87540.msg1049923#msg1049923 date=1315246560] [quote author=PN-G bamakid link=topic=87540.msg1049913#msg1049913 date=1315245638] [quote author=True Blue link=topic=87540.msg1049816#msg1049816 date=1315229871] [quote author=77 link=topic=87540.msg1049024#msg1049024 date=1315107332] What is this guy done that would make yall want him back in? [/quote]The notion that the stimulus failed has hardened into Republican orthodoxy, but it doesn't hold up. A study released last week by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office confirmed that as of June, between 1 million and 2.9 million people are working who wouldn't otherwise have been, thanks to the stimulus. That study wasn't an outlier. Several others came to similar conclusions, including one by the economists Alan Blinder and Mark Zandi. As Jared Bernstein notes, the analysis by Blinder and Zandi found that the stimulus was responsible for roughly 2.7 million jobs and increased the GDP in 2010 by a healthy 3.4 percent.But a payroll tax cut has been in effect since the start of the year, and as Bruce Bartlett, who served as a Treasury official in President George H.W. Bush's administration, wrote this week, "There is no evidence that the lower payroll tax has done much of anything to stimulate either spending or hiring." The Obama administration has proposed extending the cut into next year. Republicans oppose the idea. The Republicans only wont the tax cut for the top 1% not for the working class. [/quote] Source? [/quote] [Hidden Content] [/quote] LMBO.......his source was "answers.yahoo.com"?? [/quote] This is the real source: [Hidden Content] It's an article westend posted that I hadn't seen when I requested True Blue's source. It appears that someone quoted the article in that particular Yahoo Answers thread.

PN-G's enrollment was 1401.

I was doing way better at this point last year.

[quote name="NHS1990" post="1050818" timestamp="1315342376"] [quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=8y7813.msg1050774#msg1050774 date=1315339026] Grad, was that the Wos team that went undefeated but loss first round? [/quote] You may be thinking of their 1989 season when they went 10-0. They were ranked #1 in the state, and lost in the 1st round. That's the same yr PNG went to the Quarter finals and lost to a5m Cons. In the Dome. [/quote] PN-G's one regular season loss that year was to WO-S. And 1989 wasn't the only season where that was the case.

[b]Memorial[/b] @ Alice [b]Aldine Eisenhower[/b] @ West Brook [b]Central[/b] @ Galveston Ball Barbers Hill @ [b]Nederland[/b] [b]Ozen[/b] @ Hou. Sam Houston Conroe Caney Creek @ [b]LC-M[/b] Crosby @ [b]Pearland[/b] Dayton @ [b]Angleton[/b] Kirbyville @ [b]Vidor[/b] [b]Silsbee[/b] @ Lumberton Texas City @ [b]PN-G[/b] [b]Anahuac[/b] @ Hardin-Jefferson Kelly @ [b]Bridge City[/b] [b]Buna[/b] @ Hamshire-Fannett [b]Coldspring[/b] @ Crockett [b]Jasper[/b] @ Houston Worthing Tarkington @ [b]Kountze[/b] Woodville @ [b]Orangfield[/b] [b]Hardin[/b] @ West Hardin San Augustine @ [b]West Sabine[/b] Warren @ [b]Deweyville[/b] [b]Evadale[/b] @ Trinity Gal. O'Connel @ [b]Sabine Pass[/b] High Island @ [b]Beaumont Legacy[/b] [b]Newton[/b] @ Corrigan-Camden

[quote name="stevenash" post="1049923" timestamp="1315246560"] [quote author=PN-G bamakid link=topic=87540.msg1049913#msg1049913 date=1315245638] [quote author=True Blue link=topic=87540.msg1049816#msg1049816 date=1315229871] [quote author=77 link=topic=87540.msg1049024#msg1049024 date=1315107332] What is this guy done that would make yall want him back in? [/quote]The notion that the stimulus failed has hardened into Republican orthodoxy, but it doesn't hold up. A study released last week by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office confirmed that as of June, between 1 million and 2.9 million people are working who wouldn't otherwise have been, thanks to the stimulus. That study wasn't an outlier. Several others came to similar conclusions, including one by the economists Alan Blinder and Mark Zandi. As Jared Bernstein notes, the analysis by Blinder and Zandi found that the stimulus was responsible for roughly 2.7 million jobs and increased the GDP in 2010 by a healthy 3.4 percent.But a payroll tax cut has been in effect since the start of the year, and as Bruce Bartlett, who served as a Treasury official in President George H.W. Bush's administration, wrote this week, "There is no evidence that the lower payroll tax has done much of anything to stimulate either spending or hiring." The Obama administration has proposed extending the cut into next year. Republicans oppose the idea. The Republicans only wont the tax cut for the top 1% not for the working class. [/quote] Source? [/quote] [Hidden Content] [/quote] Thanks.

[quote name="True Blue" post="1049816" timestamp="1315229871"] [quote author=77 link=topic=87540.msg1049024#msg1049024 date=1315107332] What is this guy done that would make yall want him back in? [/quote]The notion that the stimulus failed has hardened into Republican orthodoxy, but it doesn't hold up. A study released last week by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office confirmed that as of June, between 1 million and 2.9 million people are working who wouldn't otherwise have been, thanks to the stimulus. That study wasn't an outlier. Several others came to similar conclusions, including one by the economists Alan Blinder and Mark Zandi. As Jared Bernstein notes, the analysis by Blinder and Zandi found that the stimulus was responsible for roughly 2.7 million jobs and increased the GDP in 2010 by a healthy 3.4 percent.But a payroll tax cut has been in effect since the start of the year, and as Bruce Bartlett, who served as a Treasury official in President George H.W. Bush's administration, wrote this week, "There is no evidence that the lower payroll tax has done much of anything to stimulate either spending or hiring." The Obama administration has proposed extending the cut into next year. Republicans oppose the idea. The Republicans only wont the tax cut for the top 1% not for the working class. [/quote] Source?

[quote name="BLUEDOVE3" post="1048941" timestamp="1315101930"] Could be a blessing for Obama if Perry wins the nomination. Could be the added fuel needed to help the President win in 2021 ;) [/quote] Dove, this election's going to be based on the economy. Perry, Romney and almost any other Republican win in that area hands down. By the way, I looked up Lichtman. His analysis is... interesting. [Hidden Content] To be honest, I don't see how he can give points the way he did. He says there is no serious challenger for the nomination of the incumbent party. I agree with him there, but I wouldn't throw that point in Obama's favor; many democrats that showed support for Obama in the '08 primaries have said that they should have gone with Hillary, so I wouldn't be so quick to give him a point for that (not saying that he doesn't clearly have the nomination, just that there's some unrest in his party). I also think his incumbency is going to work against him as it traditionally has in a poor economic climate, so I wouldn't give Obama that point, either. Lichtman's "undecided" point, the influence of the economic conditions, is one I would put solidly in the Republicans' corner, whether Perry or Romney wins the nomination (both have better job creation records than Obama). I also think the major policy changes will work against Obama, so there's another point deduction. As for social unrest... well, I have mixed feelings, but I'll be fair and leave that point in Obama's corner. As far as foreign affairs failures, while there's been no outright failure, relations with Israel have all but collapsed, China is not very happy with American spending (which, like it or not, is on the Democrats) and our relations with Russia were very shaky for the first year and a half of Obama's term (they still aren't great) - that's another point deduction, in my mind. The last two (charisma of incumbent and challenger) should be switched in my mind. Perry and Obama are both charismatic, and Romney isn't exactly boring. So, my score, [b]based on this criteria[/b], is 5-4-4 with Obama in the lead, but not by much. With each passing day, Obama's approval rating drops and the Republicans gain momentum. Given a year, I think the pick for the 2013-2017 term is going to clearly be a Republican (I'm thinking Perry, personally), if it isn't already (which is a bit of a stretch).

I'm receiving text messages saying that traffic is holding the bus convoy and the fans are held up in traffic.

[quote name="BLUEDOVE3" post="1046399" timestamp="1314926111"] He'll win.  I'll get that sources PNG  when I get home [/quote] Ok.

Just out of curiosity, what teams are considered for the rankings? Where's the line between Southeast Texas and the rest of the state?

[quote name="BLUEDOVE3" post="1046262" timestamp="1314912753"] I knew there was a reason many of yall seemed worried and just throwing all kinds of road-blocks to halt change ;D Good news for the party for the people; the Obama camp: "a different model, from American University professor Allan Lichtman, "whose election formula has correctly called every president since Ronald Reagan’s 1984 re-election," says Obama is a shoo-in."  :o [/quote] Source?

[quote name="ndnsrock44" post="1045006" timestamp="1314732567"] [quote author=Cougtalk link=topic=87323.msg1044479#msg1044479 date=1314673734] [quote author=Matt link=topic=87323.msg1044358#msg1044358 date=1314666847] Crosby has nightmare about purple and white, LMAO [/quote] If that where true and it isn't it wouldn't have anything to do with indians. [/quote] Yeah. Because Crosby has beaten us how many times? May want to do a little research on the series history. [/quote] What is the overall record?

Ozen @ [b]PA Memorial[/b] [b]West Brook[/b] @ Central Jasper @ [b]Livingston[/b] [b]LC-M[/b] @ Nacogdoches Lumberton @ [b]Barbers Hill[/b] [b]Nederland[/b] @ GC Memorial [b]PN-G[/b] @ Crosby Bridge City @ [b]Vidor[/b] [b]Diboll[/b] @ Corrigan-Camden [b]Friendswood[/b] @ WO-S Hamshire-Fannett @ [b]Anahuac[/b] Hardin-Jefferson @ [b]Splendora[/b] Kirbyville @ [b]Newton[/b] Madisonville @ [b]Coldspring[/b] [b]Orangefield[/b] @ Buna Shepherd @ [b]Woodville[/b] [b]Silsbee[/b] @ Cleveland Tarkington @ [b]Hardin[/b] Kelly @ [b]East Chambers[/b] [b]Evadale[/b] @ Deweyville Warren @ [b]Groveton[/b] [b]West Sabine[/b] @ Hemphill [b]Beaumont Legacy[/b] @ Burkeville High Island @ [b]Colmesneil[/b] Sabine Pass @ [b]West Hardin[/b]

Congratulations, Pirates. Vidor beat Texas, Nederland beat WO-S, PN-G dominated G-P... 20-4A is shaping up to be a tough district this year.

Remember the Alamo.

[quote name="pngfan1" post="1042816" timestamp="1314489200"] [quote author=earlwick link=topic=87295.msg1042793#msg1042793 date=1314485347] Will this game be on 92.5 [/quote] It's supposed to be. [/quote] Listening to it right now.

That's a great test for the Indians.

[quote name="daytonfan" post="1040249" timestamp="1314221590"] Were is Gregory Portland? Never herd of them. Are they 4A? [/quote] They're 4A. I believe they were state-ranked at the beginning of the season last year in DCTF's Top 25.

GP North Shore @ [b]Katy[/b] [b]PA Memorial[/b] @ Central [b]Barbers Hill[/b] @ Santa Fe Crosby @ [b]Montgomery[/b] Fort Bend @ [b]Dayton[/b] Goose Creek @ [b]LCM[/b] [b]Lumberton[/b] @ Jasper [b]Texas High[/b] @ Vidor [b]WO-S[/b] @ Nederland [b]Bridge City[/b] @ Shepherd Coldspring @ [b]Kirbyville[/b] East Chambers @ [b]Orangefield[/b] Hardin @ [b]Liberty[/b] Hou Waltrip @ [b]Silsbee[/b] [b]Huffman[/b] @ Hardin Jefferson [b]Splendora[/b] @ Hamshire-Fannett [b]Anahuac[/b] @ Houston Kinkaid Corrigan Camden @ [b]Woodville[/b] [b]Deweyville[/b] @ Sabine Pass [b]Hull-Daisetta[/b] @ Kountze West Hardin @ [b]Warren[/b] Gal O'Conner @ [b]Evadale[/b] High Island @ [b]Woodlands Christian[/b] [b]Port Neches-Groves[/b] @ Gregory-Portland - Can't forget my Indians. ;D

What games will be broadcasted?

[quote name="BADSANTA" post="1036475" timestamp="1313596626"] I think Jasper reminds me the most. When the game starts, the only thing thats open in Dairy Queen and the police station. [/quote] You mean your Dairy Queen stays open? ;D