2011 Stats vs. 2012 Realignment

[Guest octfeb]

http://www.texasfootballratings.com/2011files/2011statsvs2012realignment.html

[BellBiz30]

Thanks Octfeb ,I liked this part
Dayton (11-4)
(13-2)
(11-3)
(9-4)
(9-4)
5
(53-17-0)
4A - 19
Crosby (8-3)
(6-5)
(10-3)
(5-7)
(6-5)
5
(35-23-0)
4A - 19
Humble (9-3)
(7-3)
(3-7)
(11-2)
(4-6)
5
(34-21-0)
4A - 18
Barbers Hill (6-4)
(3-6)
(5-6)
(7-4)
(9-2)
5
(30-22-0)
4A - 19
Houston C.E. King (3-7)
(7-3)
(5-5)
(4-6)
(4-6)
5
(23-27-0)
4A - 19
Hum. Kingwood Park (0-0)
(1-8)
(4-6)
(8-4)
(8-3)
4
(21-21-0)
4A - 18
Humble Summer Creek (0-0)
(0-0)
(0-0)
(3-7)
(9-2)
2
(12-9-0)
4A - 18
New Caney (2-8)
(1-8)
(2-8)
(3-7)
(2-8)
5
(10-39-0)
4A - 18
New Caney Porter (0-0)
(0-0)
(0-0)
(1-9)
(3-7)
2
(4-16-0)
4A - 18

[JohnSmith]

Has anyone noticed that only three teams have won as many or more games than Dayton in the past five years in 2012 4A Realignment.
Aledo 67-7  74
Highland Park 61-7  68
DAYTON 53-17  70
Everman 53-12  65

bh 30-22  52

[knightrider]

[quote name="JohnSmith" post="1180978" timestamp="1329668869"]
Has anyone noticed that only three teams have won as many or more games than Dayton in the past five years in 2012 4A Realignment.
Aledo 67-7  74
Highland Park 61-7  68
DAYTON 53-17  70
Everman 53-12  65

bh 30-22  52
[/quote] ::) ::) :)

[Eazy]

I was definitely surprised that Dayton had more wins than Brenham in the last 5 years.  That texasfootballratings info is some pretty cool stuff. 

[Guest octfeb]

[quote name="Eazy" post="1181120" timestamp="1329702661"]
I was definitely [b]surprised that Dayton had more wins than Brenham in the last 5 years. [/b] That texasfootballratings info is some pretty cool stuff.
[/quote] Which just goes to show you that Brenham is over rated... And the others get WAY more exposure than Dayton ever has...

[Eazy]

[quote name="octfeb" post="1181172" timestamp="1329714190"]
[quote author=Eazy link=topic=96070.msg1181120#msg1181120 date=1329702661]
I was definitely [b]surprised that Dayton had more wins than Brenham in the last 5 years. [/b] That texasfootballratings info is some pretty cool stuff.
[/quote] Which just goes to show you that Brenham is over rated... And the others get WAY more exposure than Dayton ever has...
[/quote]On the flip side, Brenham only has 13 losses vs. 17 for Dayton, so the Brenham winning percentage is higher. 

[Guest octfeb]

[quote name="Eazy" post="1181327" timestamp="1329760011"]
[quote author=octfeb link=topic=96070.msg1181172#msg1181172 date=1329714190]
[quote author=Eazy link=topic=96070.msg1181120#msg1181120 date=1329702661]
I was definitely [b]surprised that Dayton had more wins than Brenham in the last 5 years. [/b] That texasfootballratings info is some pretty cool stuff.
[/quote] Which just goes to show you that Brenham is over rated... And the others get WAY more exposure than Dayton ever has...
[/quote]On the flip side, Brenham only has 13 losses vs. 17 for Dayton, so the Brenham winning percentage is higher.
[/quote]You can't base them having a higher winning percentage... Dayton has played 70 games to Brenhams 63.. which obviously puts Dayton in higher loss category than Brenham. So assume Brenham played 70 games like Dayton and assume Brenham  lost those extra 7 games. That would put them at 20 loses to Dayton 17 loses.Or assume Brenham won the extra 7 games Brenham would only have 4 more wins than Dayton  Or assume Brenham lost 4 and won 3, then they would be even. Or assume Brenham won 4 and lost 3, then they would only have 1 win over Dayton.  bottom line unless you have the same games played numbers, you can't do a percentage... I don't think. Wheres Mr. Toups.. He the math Genius.

[BrenhamFan]

[quote name="octfeb" post="1181331" timestamp="1329760700"]
[quote author=Eazy link=topic=96070.msg1181327#msg1181327 date=1329760011]
[quote author=octfeb link=topic=96070.msg1181172#msg1181172 date=1329714190]
[quote author=Eazy link=topic=96070.msg1181120#msg1181120 date=1329702661]
I was definitely [b]surprised that Dayton had more wins than Brenham in the last 5 years. [/b] That texasfootballratings info is some pretty cool stuff.
[/quote] Which just goes to show you that Brenham is over rated... And the others get WAY more exposure than Dayton ever has...
[/quote]On the flip side, Brenham only has 13 losses vs. 17 for Dayton, so the Brenham winning percentage is higher.
[/quote]You can't base them having a higher winning percentage... Dayton has played 70 games to Brenhams 63.. which obviously puts Dayton in higher loss category than Brenham. So assume Brenham played 70 games like Dayton and assume Brenham  lost those extra 7 games. That would put them at 20 loses to Dayton 17 loses.Or assume Brenham won the extra 7 games Brenham would only have 4 more wins than Dayton  Or assume Brenham lost 4 and won 3, then they would be even. Or assume Brenham won 4 and lost 3, then they would only have 1 win over Dayton.  bottom line unless you have the same games played numbers, you can't do a percentage... I don't think. Wheres Mr. Toups.. He the math Genius.
[/quote]

Well for the last 2 years, we have only lost 1 game a year.  At that rate it would take 3 years to get the same amount of losses Dayton has. (assuming y'all went 16-0 every year for the next 3 years....  We all know that wouldn't happen either though) You call us overrated, but if you look at the #'s were every bit what Dayton is....

[Guest octfeb]

[quote name="BrenhamFan" post="1181346" timestamp="1329762770"]
[quote author=octfeb link=topic=96070.msg1181331#msg1181331 date=1329760700]
[quote author=Eazy link=topic=96070.msg1181327#msg1181327 date=1329760011]
[quote author=octfeb link=topic=96070.msg1181172#msg1181172 date=1329714190]
[quote author=Eazy link=topic=96070.msg1181120#msg1181120 date=1329702661]
I was definitely [b]surprised that Dayton had more wins than Brenham in the last 5 years. [/b] That texasfootballratings info is some pretty cool stuff.
[/quote] Which just goes to show you that Brenham is over rated... And the others get WAY more exposure than Dayton ever has...
[/quote]On the flip side, Brenham only has 13 losses vs. 17 for Dayton, so the Brenham winning percentage is higher.
[/quote]You can't base them having a higher winning percentage... Dayton has played 70 games to Brenhams 63.. which obviously puts Dayton in higher loss category than Brenham. So assume Brenham played 70 games like Dayton and assume Brenham  lost those extra 7 games. That would put them at 20 loses to Dayton 17 loses.Or assume Brenham won the extra 7 games Brenham would only have 4 more wins than Dayton  Or assume Brenham lost 4 and won 3, then they would be even. Or assume Brenham won 4 and lost 3, then they would only have 1 win over Dayton.  bottom line unless you have the same games played numbers, you can't do a percentage... I don't think. Wheres Mr. Toups.. He the math Genius.
[/quote]

Well for the last 2 years, we have only lost 1 game a year.  At that rate it would take 3 years to get the same amount of losses Dayton has. (assuming y'all went 16-0 every year for the next 3 years....  We all know that wouldn't happen either though) You call us overrated, [b]but if you look at the #'s were every bit what Dayton is....[/b]
[/quote]I'm not saying yall are less than Dayton.. And you just made my point with your last statement. Yall always seem to rank WAY above Dayton EVERY YEAR.. But yet we are every bit what Brenham is.. And the Numbers that are being talked about are for the last 5 years.. not 3 years into the future. Eazy was trying to put a percentage on the 2 teams.. which you can't do when the games played are different.

[BrenhamFan]

[quote name="octfeb" post="1181349" timestamp="1329763917"]
[quote author=BrenhamFan link=topic=96070.msg1181346#msg1181346 date=1329762770]
[quote author=octfeb link=topic=96070.msg1181331#msg1181331 date=1329760700]
[quote author=Eazy link=topic=96070.msg1181327#msg1181327 date=1329760011]
[quote author=octfeb link=topic=96070.msg1181172#msg1181172 date=1329714190]
[quote author=Eazy link=topic=96070.msg1181120#msg1181120 date=1329702661]
I was definitely [b]surprised that Dayton had more wins than Brenham in the last 5 years. [/b] That texasfootballratings info is some pretty cool stuff.
[/quote] Which just goes to show you that Brenham is over rated... And the others get WAY more exposure than Dayton ever has...
[/quote]On the flip side, Brenham only has 13 losses vs. 17 for Dayton, so the Brenham winning percentage is higher.
[/quote]You can't base them having a higher winning percentage... Dayton has played 70 games to Brenhams 63.. which obviously puts Dayton in higher loss category than Brenham. So assume Brenham played 70 games like Dayton and assume Brenham  lost those extra 7 games. That would put them at 20 loses to Dayton 17 loses.Or assume Brenham won the extra 7 games Brenham would only have 4 more wins than Dayton  Or assume Brenham lost 4 and won 3, then they would be even. Or assume Brenham won 4 and lost 3, then they would only have 1 win over Dayton.  bottom line unless you have the same games played numbers, you can't do a percentage... I don't think. Wheres Mr. Toups.. He the math Genius.
[/quote]

Well for the last 2 years, we have only lost 1 game a year.  At that rate it would take 3 years to get the same amount of losses Dayton has. (assuming y'all went 16-0 every year for the next 3 years....  We all know that wouldn't happen either though) You call us overrated, [b]but if you look at the #'s were every bit what Dayton is....[/b]
[/quote]I'm not saying yall are less than Dayton.. And you just made my point with your last statement. Yall always seem to rank WAY above Dayton EVERY YEAR.. But yet we are every bit what Brenham is.. And the Numbers that are being talked about are for the last 5 years.. not 3 years into the future. Eazy was trying to put a percentage on the 2 teams.. which you can't do when the games played are different.
[/quote]

Touché.  I'm not the one who does the rankings.  To be fair to the pollsters though....
They don't rank Dayton to start the season and Dayton loses early. (at least the last year or 2)

[Guest octfeb]

[quote name="BrenhamFan" post="1181351" timestamp="1329764357"]
[quote author=octfeb link=topic=96070.msg1181349#msg1181349 date=1329763917]
[quote author=BrenhamFan link=topic=96070.msg1181346#msg1181346 date=1329762770]
[quote author=octfeb link=topic=96070.msg1181331#msg1181331 date=1329760700]
[quote author=Eazy link=topic=96070.msg1181327#msg1181327 date=1329760011]
[quote author=octfeb link=topic=96070.msg1181172#msg1181172 date=1329714190]
[quote author=Eazy link=topic=96070.msg1181120#msg1181120 date=1329702661]
I was definitely [b]surprised that Dayton had more wins than Brenham in the last 5 years. [/b] That texasfootballratings info is some pretty cool stuff.
[/quote] Which just goes to show you that Brenham is over rated... And the others get WAY more exposure than Dayton ever has...
[/quote]On the flip side, Brenham only has 13 losses vs. 17 for Dayton, so the Brenham winning percentage is higher.
[/quote]You can't base them having a higher winning percentage... Dayton has played 70 games to Brenhams 63.. which obviously puts Dayton in higher loss category than Brenham. So assume Brenham played 70 games like Dayton and assume Brenham  lost those extra 7 games. That would put them at 20 loses to Dayton 17 loses.Or assume Brenham won the extra 7 games Brenham would only have 4 more wins than Dayton  Or assume Brenham lost 4 and won 3, then they would be even. Or assume Brenham won 4 and lost 3, then they would only have 1 win over Dayton.  bottom line unless you have the same games played numbers, you can't do a percentage... I don't think. Wheres Mr. Toups.. He the math Genius.
[/quote]

Well for the last 2 years, we have only lost 1 game a year.  At that rate it would take 3 years to get the same amount of losses Dayton has. (assuming y'all went 16-0 every year for the next 3 years....  We all know that wouldn't happen either though) You call us overrated, [b]but if you look at the #'s were every bit what Dayton is....[/b]
[/quote]I'm not saying yall are less than Dayton.. And you just made my point with your last statement. Yall always seem to rank WAY above Dayton EVERY YEAR.. But yet we are every bit what Brenham is.. And the Numbers that are being talked about are for the last 5 years.. not 3 years into the future. Eazy was trying to put a percentage on the 2 teams.. which you can't do when the games played are different.
[/quote]

Touché.  I'm not the one who does the rankings.  To be fair to the pollsters though....
They don't rank Dayton to start the season and Dayton loses early. (at least the last year or 2)
[/quote]They should be ranked how they finish not how they start :-\

[BrenhamFan]

[quote name="octfeb" post="1181367" timestamp="1329765559"]
[quote author=BrenhamFan link=topic=96070.msg1181351#msg1181351 date=1329764357]
[quote author=octfeb link=topic=96070.msg1181349#msg1181349 date=1329763917]
[quote author=BrenhamFan link=topic=96070.msg1181346#msg1181346 date=1329762770]
[quote author=octfeb link=topic=96070.msg1181331#msg1181331 date=1329760700]
[quote author=Eazy link=topic=96070.msg1181327#msg1181327 date=1329760011]
[quote author=octfeb link=topic=96070.msg1181172#msg1181172 date=1329714190]
[quote author=Eazy link=topic=96070.msg1181120#msg1181120 date=1329702661]
I was definitely [b]surprised that Dayton had more wins than Brenham in the last 5 years. [/b] That texasfootballratings info is some pretty cool stuff.
[/quote] Which just goes to show you that Brenham is over rated... And the others get WAY more exposure than Dayton ever has...
[/quote]On the flip side, Brenham only has 13 losses vs. 17 for Dayton, so the Brenham winning percentage is higher.
[/quote]You can't base them having a higher winning percentage... Dayton has played 70 games to Brenhams 63.. which obviously puts Dayton in higher loss category than Brenham. So assume Brenham played 70 games like Dayton and assume Brenham  lost those extra 7 games. That would put them at 20 loses to Dayton 17 loses.Or assume Brenham won the extra 7 games Brenham would only have 4 more wins than Dayton  Or assume Brenham lost 4 and won 3, then they would be even. Or assume Brenham won 4 and lost 3, then they would only have 1 win over Dayton.  bottom line unless you have the same games played numbers, you can't do a percentage... I don't think. Wheres Mr. Toups.. He the math Genius.
[/quote]

Well for the last 2 years, we have only lost 1 game a year.  At that rate it would take 3 years to get the same amount of losses Dayton has. (assuming y'all went 16-0 every year for the next 3 years....  We all know that wouldn't happen either though) You call us overrated, [b]but if you look at the #'s were every bit what Dayton is....[/b]
[/quote]I'm not saying yall are less than Dayton.. And you just made my point with your last statement. Yall always seem to rank WAY above Dayton EVERY YEAR.. But yet we are every bit what Brenham is.. And the Numbers that are being talked about are for the last 5 years.. not 3 years into the future. Eazy was trying to put a percentage on the 2 teams.. which you can't do when the games played are different.
[/quote]

Touché.  I'm not the one who does the rankings.  To be fair to the pollsters though....
They don't rank Dayton to start the season and Dayton loses early. (at least the last year or 2)
[/quote]They should be ranked how they finish not how they start :-\
[/quote]

They do it on what teams return. (part of it anyways)

[Hawkeye]

We're past due for a Dayton vs. Brenham rematch. I miss those days. Great times!

[BrenhamFan]

[quote name="Hawkeye" post="1181502" timestamp="1329787015"]
We're past due for a Dayton vs. Brenham rematch. I miss those days. Great times!
[/quote]

You ain't lying....

[bh89-2]

[quote name="octfeb" post="1181349" timestamp="1329763917"]
[quote author=BrenhamFan link=topic=96070.msg1181346#msg1181346 date=1329762770]
[quote author=octfeb link=topic=96070.msg1181331#msg1181331 date=1329760700]
[quote author=Eazy link=topic=96070.msg1181327#msg1181327 date=1329760011]
[quote author=octfeb link=topic=96070.msg1181172#msg1181172 date=1329714190]
[quote author=Eazy link=topic=96070.msg1181120#msg1181120 date=1329702661]
I was definitely [b]surprised that Dayton had more wins than Brenham in the last 5 years. [/b] That texasfootballratings info is some pretty cool stuff.
[/quote] Which just goes to show you that Brenham is over rated... And the others get WAY more exposure than Dayton ever has...
[/quote]On the flip side, Brenham only has 13 losses vs. 17 for Dayton, so the Brenham winning percentage is higher.
[/quote]You can't base them having a higher winning percentage... Dayton has played 70 games to Brenhams 63.. which obviously puts Dayton in higher loss category than Brenham. So assume Brenham played 70 games like Dayton and assume Brenham  lost those extra 7 games. That would put them at 20 loses to Dayton 17 loses.Or assume Brenham won the extra 7 games Brenham would only have 4 more wins than Dayton  Or assume Brenham lost 4 and won 3, then they would be even. Or assume Brenham won 4 and lost 3, then they would only have 1 win over Dayton.  bottom line unless you have the same games played numbers, you can't do a percentage... I don't think. Wheres Mr. Toups.. He the math Genius.
[/quote]

Well for the last 2 years, we have only lost 1 game a year.  At that rate it would take 3 years to get the same amount of losses Dayton has. (assuming y'all went 16-0 every year for the next 3 years....  We all know that wouldn't happen either though) You call us overrated, [b]but if you look at the #'s were every bit what Dayton is....[/b]
[/quote]I'm not saying yall are less than Dayton.. And you just made my point with your last statement. Yall always seem to rank WAY above Dayton EVERY YEAR.. [u][b]But yet we are every bit what Brenham is[/b][/u].. And the Numbers that are being talked about are for the last 5 years.. not 3 years into the future. Eazy was trying to put a percentage on the 2 teams.. which you can't do when the games played are different.
[/quote]

Now that's funny!  You better worry about BH, Kindwood park, Crosby, and Summer Creak.  Ozen took BH and Brenham out, so maybe BH is more like Brenham than Dayton...... ;D ;D ;D

[Eazy]

Of course you can put a percentage on 2 teams when the games played are different.  Brenham is 79.4% and Dayton is 75.7%.  Dayton overall has gone deeper in the playoffs over the last 5 years, hence the 7 extra games.  The last 2 years of early playoff exits for Brenham has given them the overrated title.

[BrenhamFan]

[quote name="Eazy" post="1181894" timestamp="1329848225"]
Of course you can put a percentage on 2 teams when the games played are different.  Brenham is 79.4% and Dayton is 75.7%.  Dayton overall has gone deeper in the playoffs over the last 5 years, hence the 7 extra games.  The last 2 years of early playoff exits for Brenham has given them the overrated title.
[/quote]

IMO, it's hard to call a team that loses 1 game every year overrated.  Now choke artist, that fits better.  We beat everybody and then choke in the playoffs...  :-[

[Guest octfeb]

[quote name="Smoking Baby" post="1181737" timestamp="1329832677"]
[quote author=octfeb link=topic=96070.msg1181349#msg1181349 date=1329763917]
[quote author=BrenhamFan link=topic=96070.msg1181346#msg1181346 date=1329762770]
[quote author=octfeb link=topic=96070.msg1181331#msg1181331 date=1329760700]
[quote author=Eazy link=topic=96070.msg1181327#msg1181327 date=1329760011]
[quote author=octfeb link=topic=96070.msg1181172#msg1181172 date=1329714190]
[quote author=Eazy link=topic=96070.msg1181120#msg1181120 date=1329702661]
I was definitely [b]surprised that Dayton had more wins than Brenham in the last 5 years. [/b] That texasfootballratings info is some pretty cool stuff.
[/quote] Which just goes to show you that Brenham is over rated... And the others get WAY more exposure than Dayton ever has...
[/quote]On the flip side, Brenham only has 13 losses vs. 17 for Dayton, so the Brenham winning percentage is higher.
[/quote]You can't base them having a higher winning percentage... Dayton has played 70 games to Brenhams 63.. which obviously puts Dayton in higher loss category than Brenham. So assume Brenham played 70 games like Dayton and assume Brenham  lost those extra 7 games. That would put them at 20 loses to Dayton 17 loses.Or assume Brenham won the extra 7 games Brenham would only have 4 more wins than Dayton  Or assume Brenham lost 4 and won 3, then they would be even. Or assume Brenham won 4 and lost 3, then they would only have 1 win over Dayton.  bottom line unless you have the same games played numbers, you can't do a percentage... I don't think. Wheres Mr. Toups.. He the math Genius.
[/quote]

Well for the last 2 years, we have only lost 1 game a year.  At that rate it would take 3 years to get the same amount of losses Dayton has. (assuming y'all went 16-0 every year for the next 3 years....  We all know that wouldn't happen either though) You call us overrated, [b]but if you look at the #'s were every bit what Dayton is....[/b]
[/quote]I'm not saying yall are less than Dayton.. And you just made my point with your last statement. Yall always seem to rank WAY above Dayton EVERY YEAR.. [u][b]But yet we are every bit what Brenham is[/b][/u].. And the Numbers that are being talked about are for the last 5 years.. not 3 years into the future. Eazy was trying to put a percentage on the 2 teams.. which you can't do when the games played are different.
[/quote]

Now that's funny!  You better worry about [b]BH, Kindwood park, Crosby, and Summer Creak.[/b]  Ozen took BH and Brenham out, so maybe BH is more like Brenham than Dayton...... ;D ;D ;D
[/quote]Bh umm no... Kingwood Park  umm no again Crosby debatable  Summer Creek also debatable but probably another umm no :P