Jump to content

#15 Central @ Livingston Predictions

BigWolf10

By BigWolf10
in SETXsports Archived Threads

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

tc35

tc35

Posted
Posted
I'm ready to hear the excuses bmtsoul, shorttex  Let me guess, You lost because of the poor field conditions that PNG also faced and put 35 on the Lions,  Or was it the bad calls from the refs ---  Indians are the District Champs in 2009. You can only tie for it now.
Nice Choke.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BigWolf10

BigWolf10

Posted
  • Author
Posted
[quote name="tc35" post="691982" timestamp="1256964282"]
I'm ready to hear the excuses bmtsoul, shorttex  Let me guess, You lost because of the poor field conditions that PNG also faced and put 35 on the Lions,   Or was it the bad calls from the refs ---  Indians are the District Champs in 2009. You can only tie for it now.
Nice Choke.
[/quote]No excuses from me. A lost is a lost. But I think we can rebound. Livingston out scored a team that clearly is mediocre in wet field conditions. Oh well, we'll most likely play on turf in the playoffs. And oh I wish both teams luck at the Babe next Friday. Good game PNG, Bad game Jags. Let's prepair for playoffs now, Friday. It can only go two ways, PNG win it all or they share it with us. They own it now, we must take a share of it. I seriously wonder if we can.  :-\
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • BS Wildcats
      Fake Pandemic Scam Part 2?!

      By BS Wildcats · Posted

      Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • bullets13
      Bridge City is open

      By bullets13 · Posted

      I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • Eagles12
      Bridge City is open

      By Eagles12 · Posted

      He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • 72 Pinto
      LC-M is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...