Jump to content

RAIDERS VS. CARDINALS


raiderpride

LUMBERTON VS. BRIDGE CITY  

60 members have voted

  1. 1. LUMBERTON VS. BRIDGE CITY

    • RAIDERS
      23
    • CARDINALS
      37


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

if you really cared less then you would have never clicked on this

Actually I clicked on it to see the trash talking. Imagine my disappointment.

you should it will be the game of the week its gonna be a great game

Uhh really, I'm serious I couldn't. It's two teams that think they are way better than they really are. I'll pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually I clicked on it to see the trash talking. Imagine my disappointment.

Uhh really' date=' I'm serious I couldn't. It's two teams that think they are way better than they really are. I'll pass.[/quote']

alright then your miss

and what about trash talkers

do you actually know any of the players

because if you dont ill tell you that not one of us has been talking crap on any team everyone of us are great sports

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Raiders have too many weapons on offense. DeJohn, not Dishon, will have a big game throwing to Garza, Hussey, Wilkerson, Credeur, Ward, and others. Hussey and Hanna will both have good games at tailback.

Cards gave up 254 yrds rushing and 67 passing to Liberty (enrollment 708)

Raiders gave up 141 rushing and 71 passing to New Caney (enrollment 1837). I know NC is not a powerhouse by any means but probably has more talent than Liberty.

Special teams, penalties, and turnovers could be the deciding factor but i don't think it will be that close.

Raiders by 14 :shock:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
    • The Republican Party is dying because of folks like you who want to compromise with socialists and folks that proclaim “from the river to the sea” in reference to Israel.  I don’t want a party that folks such as yourself want to save, may as well be democrats, which you apparently are. My standards haven’t changed, yours have.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...