Jump to content

will navasota be able to stop jaspers offense??


Will navasotas defence be able to stop jaspers offense  

28 members have voted

  1. 1. Will navasotas defence be able to stop jaspers offense

    • yes
      5
    • no
      23


Recommended Posts

Jasper has been a running team almost all year.Jasper really did'nt need to run sat cause the air ways were wide open so if they try to stop the pass that will open up the running lanes for D.Bailey,W.Brooks,D.Bronson,W.Ellis and M.Bronson we should have freash backs in at all times.Jasper 35 Navasota 21.

Jasper will not have to deal with such a big O Line fri so we should win this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop no !!!!! slow down Maybe????

The question is will Jasper be able to slow down Navasota's Offense?

They have a great RB, WR, and QB.

Remind me of silsbee

RB better than silsbee's

WR almost as good as silsbee's

QB very similar as well

If Jasper holds on to the football they win if not we could see a nail bitter like the Silsbee game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I am saying is Jasper will have to run the ball due to the Rattlers speed on the corners. But whatever the outcome if you win enjoy it for the next game will be against Liberty Hill and they will out gun you. Big O-Line Speed and tons of playoff savy! I was impressed with Jasper against Splendora and I promise if yall do win this week, I will be there for the Liberty Hill game. I want to see the Bulldogs play against adversity and how they react!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jasper has the team to win friday that for sure.As long as we hold on to the ball.And can Navasota get pass out Big D. we have a lot of speed as well at the coners.And if we get past this one and the Hill is still there it will be a tough came just like before and they said we would not win that game but hard work and speed pull it out for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!
    • See why I don't trust my Hogs?
    • Come on dude, don’t take anything away from the kids on the field. If you want to talk uncharacteristic, we made what 3 or 4 errors in game one. Y’all had 2 EARNED runs.  Defense is normally our strong suit. Your ace didn’t strike out a single one of our kids. Like I said also, you did not out hit us in game 1. Hell you barley out hit us in game 2. We had all the uncharacteristic walks. Josh pitched a hell of a game is what made that game what it was.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...