Jump to content

Crosby VS LC-M Battlin' Bears

LCMAlumtiger32

By LCMAlumtiger32
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

LCMAlumtiger32

LCMAlumtiger32

Posted
Posted

Well LCM picked up 14.2 Crosby Cougars on our bye week and we dumped St. Pius on the following week which i think is a bad idea. I watched Crosby against Jasper. There offense is explosive and they have a good running back. I thought Jasper ran the ball on them pretty well. Crosby defense has  given up 103 points in three weeks and it looks like they have been having problems stopping folks. It does not take a genius to figure out Crosby is the heavy favorite in this game. We will have players going both ways and Crosby probably wont have any. We are still trying to get conditioned after missing weeks of practice. Our defense looked better last night but we have not faced a spread team. Our Offense, well we are still having problems snapping the ball, and against a good football team you can not do that. Play calling is another thing with the 10 bubble screens and jet sweeps 3rd and 10. I think we should have gotten our offense vertical throwing the ball. One of our wide receiver was a foot taller than Orangefield cornerback and we only threw his direction 3 or 4 times. I'd like to see a good close game with no silly mistakes on offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
texbuzz

texbuzz

Posted
Posted

If there was ever a team to face that was an obvious mismatch, then it is this Crosby team.  I don't think they are interested in posting huge scores against teams.  2 of the last 3 games looked like blowouts for Crosby and then the other team caught fire and made it a game.  

I want to say this is part of the plan to get to the playoffs healthy but that does a disservice to the other teams that are fighting to get back into the game.  

A good running game is going to have some success against the Crosby defense.  

Offensively, you probably don't have the speed to match.  Couple of these kids are really fast.  Play disciplined and preventing the home run can keep a team in it.  Looking forward to the visit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LCMAlumtiger32

LCMAlumtiger32

Posted
  • Author
Posted
18 hours ago, texbuzz said:

If there was ever a team to face that was an obvious mismatch, then it is this Crosby team.  I don't think they are interested in posting huge scores against teams.  2 of the last 3 games looked like blowouts for Crosby and then the other team caught fire and made it a game.  

I want to say this is part of the plan to get to the playoffs healthy but that does a disservice to the other teams that are fighting to get back into the game.  

A good running game is going to have some success against the Crosby defense.  

Offensively, you probably don't have the speed to match.  Couple of these kids are really fast.  Play disciplined and preventing the home run can keep a team in it.  Looking forward to the visit.

Get there early it’s homecoming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ScubaSteve

ScubaSteve

Posted
Posted

Really, it's going to be homecoming. Dang! 

Add that to complaint list...

1. The drive there 

2. The drive home 

3. 7PM start, I prefer 7:30, gives me 30 more minutes to find my way

4. Homecoming 

5. ???

 

Seriously, as always I hope for a good clean game, where both teams show improvement, no injuries & a Crosby victory. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Separation Scientist
      West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin leaves Democratic Party, registers as independent

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      Exactly Lum. Right is still right regardless which way the wind blows. 
    • PhatMack19
      Road to Omaha

      By PhatMack19 · Posted

      High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Separation Scientist
      Bridgeland vs Tomball

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • UT alum
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By UT alum · Posted

    • CardinalBacker
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By CardinalBacker · Posted

      My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...