Jump to content

Arch for MVP

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    314

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

62 Excellent

See reputation activity

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1.    bullets13 reacted to a post in a topic: LCM @ HF
  2.    Arch for MVP reacted to a post in a topic: DCTF Week 3 State Rankings
  3. Arch for MVP
    Similar to vidor score IMO. Wont be close at all.
  4.    Arch for MVP reacted to a post in a topic: Navasota @ Vidor
  5. Arch for MVP
    Full slate there of some good games. Very jealous.
  6. Arch for MVP
    Gonna say da 🐝 by 10
  7.    Arch for MVP reacted to a post in a topic: Navasota @ Vidor
  8. Arch for MVP
    Sounds like if vidor can not fumble snaps we can keep it close😂
  9.    Arch for MVP reacted to a post in a topic: Navasota @ Vidor
  10.    AggiesAreWe reacted to a post in a topic: What Week 3 game(s) will you be attending?
  11. Arch for MVP
    Navasota and vidor. pregame meal at the one and only, mutt and jeffs
  12. Arch for MVP
    Whats the scoop on Navasota? Dont know much about them but i hear theyre typically pretty decent. Im gonna go Vidor 31-28. Vidor fixes some issues and plays better this week.
  13. Arch for MVP
    West Orange by as much as theyd like. See bc scoring 7-10 later in game. Gonna go with a 50-10 score or similar. West Orange defense gonna be to fast and athletic for BC offense imo
  14.    Arch for MVP reacted to a post in a topic: FINAL — Hamshire-Fannett 52 at Vidor 10 — Discussion
  15.    bullets13 reacted to a post in a topic: FINAL — Hamshire-Fannett 52 at Vidor 10 — Discussion
  16. Arch for MVP
    Man aint that the truth. HF was DOMINANT. +10000 on the line play. Them boys must live in the film room. They were ready for legitimately everything that was thrown at them. Disguised coverages. Delayed blitzes. We could not fool them. Rooting for yall the rest of the way, yall have an extremely good team.
  17.    Arch for MVP reacted to a post in a topic: FINAL — Hamshire-Fannett 52 at Vidor 10 — Discussion
  18. Arch for MVP
    West orange and HF for the right to get beat by carthage in the title game in my opinion. HF and WoS is gonna be a great match up of speed on speed. If HF o line can block like they did last night watch out. They were very well prepared for vidors blitzes and stunts
  19.    bullets13 reacted to a post in a topic: FINAL — Hamshire-Fannett 52 at Vidor 10 — Discussion
  20. Arch for MVP
    Definitely didn’t this week lol
  21.    Arch for MVP reacted to a post in a topic: FINAL — Orangefield 18 at Bridge City 16 — Discussion
  22. Arch for MVP
    Rough watch. Thats called getting overmatched and outplayed in every single position on the field
  23. Arch for MVP
    I left. Any other score updates?
  24. Arch for MVP
    3 our offense looks terrible this week. HF putting 8 on the line and saying cmon with it fumbled exchanges, procedure penalties Was hoping for a better showing but HF just a beast, fun to watch them ball out
  25. Arch for MVP
    2 touchdowns would be negated. Not thinking it would really matter with how HF offense is rolling but its still the point😂
  26. Arch for MVP
    The back judge refuses to throw his flag on a couple blatant holds
×
×
  • Create New...