Report
-
Posts
-
That was a Jason Aldean concert and we know he is conservative, so most of that crowd was probably conservative and pro Trump, so why would you care? Let’s be more concerned about how many were killed and wounded instead of addressing the simple fact that he was an evil person. If evil people want you dead, they will find a way to do it. Like tvc said, if half as many were killed, that’s acceptable? I believe he could have killed more with a semi-automatic but that’s just me.
-
By LumRaiderFan · Posted
I’m sure a maniac that would kill 60 folks and wound over 400 would never ignore a ban. -
By CardinalBacker · Posted
By my guess a bump stock ban would have saved roughly half of the lives lost in Vegas. But then again, I forget that your trigger finger is as fast as full auto, so it wouldnt have mattered. -
Out of all of your comments, this might be the most ridiculous; “fight for the right to slaughter kids”. Please point out anyone who believes there is a “right to slaughter kids”… and you call other people nuts? You still don’t answer the questions and go back to emotions. Should people be arrested for something that isn’t a crime? Should the Supreme Court ignore the Constitution in favor of emotions? Would a ban on bump stocks have prevented any crime?
-
Topics