sticky Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 1. Stephenville (I-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 82.46 2. McKinney North (II-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 81.82 3. Corpus Christi Calallen (IV-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 81.04 4. Texarkana Texas High (II-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 79.53 5. La Marque (III-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 78.61 6. Rosenberg Lamar Consolidated (III-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 78.44 7. Dallas Highland Park (II-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 78.35 8. El Campo (III-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 78.22 9. Mesquite Poteet (II-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 78.08 10. Keller Fossil Ridge (I-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 77.93 14. Galena Park (III-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 76.07 19. Brenham (III-4A) (2-1-0) (0-0-0) 74.97 36. Mont Belvieu Barbers Hill (III-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 70.46 46. Marshall (II-4A) (2-1-0) (0-0-0) 67.92 49. Beaumont Central (III-4A) (1-2-0) (0-0-0) 66.88 51. Livingston (III-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 66.14 62. Crosby (III-4A) (1-2-0) (0-0-0) 61.58 83. Huffman Hargrave (III-4A) (2-1-0) (0-0-0) 57.78 98. Port Neches-Groves (III-4A) (2-1-0) (0-0-0) 55.44 110. Texas City (III-4A) (2-1-0) (0-0-0) 53.61 116. Nederland (III-4A) (1-2-0) (0-0-0) 52.83 137. Dayton (III-4A) (1-2-0) (0-0-0) 47.22 155. Houston Smiley (III-4A) (2-0-0) (0-0-0) 42.88 161. Beaumont Ozen (III-4A) (0-3-0) (0-0-0) 41.28 164. Orange Little Cypress-Mauriceville (III-4A) (1-2-0) (0-0-0) 41.15 180. Lumberton (III-4A) (2-0-0) (0-0-0) 38.88 207. Bay City (III-4A) (0-3-0) (0-0-0) 26.26 208. Houston C.E. King (III-4A) (0-2-0) (0-0-0) 26.06 215. New Caney (III-4A) (0-2-0) (0-0-0) 21.13 220. Houston Forest Brook (III-4A) (0-2-0) (0-0-0) 19.44 227. Vidor (III-4A) (1-1-0) (0-0-0) 16.50 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L-Town Stunners Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 1. Stephenville (I-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 82.46 2. McKinney North (II-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 81.82 3. Corpus Christi Calallen (IV-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 81.04 4. Texarkana Texas High (II-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 79.53 5. La Marque (III-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 78.61 6. Rosenberg Lamar Consolidated (III-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 78.44 7. Dallas Highland Park (II-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 78.35 8. El Campo (III-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 78.22 9. Mesquite Poteet (II-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 78.08 10. Keller Fossil Ridge (I-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 77.93 14. Galena Park (III-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 76.07 19. Brenham (III-4A) (2-1-0) (0-0-0) 74.97 36. Mont Belvieu Barbers Hill (III-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 70.46 46. Marshall (II-4A) (2-1-0) (0-0-0) 67.92 49. Beaumont Central (III-4A) (1-2-0) (0-0-0) 66.88 51. Livingston (III-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 66.14 62. Crosby (III-4A) (1-2-0) (0-0-0) 61.58 83. Huffman Hargrave (III-4A) (2-1-0) (0-0-0) 57.78 98. Port Neches-Groves (III-4A) (2-1-0) (0-0-0) 55.44 110. Texas City (III-4A) (2-1-0) (0-0-0) 53.61 116. Nederland (III-4A) (1-2-0) (0-0-0) 52.83 137. Dayton (III-4A) (1-2-0) (0-0-0) 47.22 155. Houston Smiley (III-4A) (2-0-0) (0-0-0) 42.88 161. Beaumont Ozen (III-4A) (0-3-0) (0-0-0) 41.28 164. Orange Little Cypress-Mauriceville (III-4A) (1-2-0) (0-0-0) 41.15 207. Bay City (III-4A) (0-3-0) (0-0-0) 26.26 208. Houston C.E. King (III-4A) (0-2-0) (0-0-0) 26.06 215. New Caney (III-4A) (0-2-0) (0-0-0) 21.13 220. Houston Forest Brook (III-4A) (0-2-0) (0-0-0) 19.44 227. Vidor (III-4A) (1-1-0) (0-0-0) 16.50 Guess I'll never understand how a 0-3 can be ranked higher than a 2-0 team. Must be based on respect, past record, past performance, a twenty slipped under the table, etc............... :shock: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KFDM COOP Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 I'll take a 20. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BHFAN Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 Holy crap BH is in the lead and they have Galena PArk in our district at #14 :shock: Of course power rankings are mathmatical and can become pretty accurate by week 10 ,but not right now IMHO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvc184 Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 Guess I'll never understand how a 0-3 can be ranked higher than a 2-0 team. Must be based on respect' date=' past record, past performance, a twenty slipped under the table, etc............... :shock: [/quote'] Strength of schedule. It is points score for/against plus the records and power rating of the other teams that you play. You can't line up weak teams to play and expect to be given credit for beating them. It is better to lose to a top 10 team by 3 points than it is to beat a weak school from a lower classification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vfootball Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 then why is port neches ahead of nederland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvc184 Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 then why is port neches ahead of nederland Nederland is currently rated at #4 with PN-G being rated at #6. What are you talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vfootball Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 the first post shows port neches 98 nederland 116 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest etbu Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 Man I had to get my specs on this one. :shock: :shock: :shock: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KFDM COOP Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 I think he thinks these power rankings are from us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WOS92 Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 He's talking about the power ratings - the title of this thread. PN-G is in at 98 with Nederland at 116. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vfootball Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 no i know they are not from you. i just dont see how they picked it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvc184 Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 I think he thinks these power rankings are from us. Yeah. I had answered two posts about the same question of record over poll rating. One was the power rating and the other being the setxsports.com poll. I got misfused on which one I was responding to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gringo Posted September 19, 2006 Report Share Posted September 19, 2006 14. Galena Park (III-4A) (3-0-0) (0-0-0) 76.07 19. Brenham (III-4A) (2-1-0) (0-0-0) 74.97 Yeah............right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kepdawg Posted September 20, 2006 Report Share Posted September 20, 2006 Power Ratings Explained http://mb4.scout.com/fhstexasfrm1.showMessage?topicID=5633.topic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts