WO-S 89 Posted Friday at 08:12 PM Report Posted Friday at 08:12 PM 5 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said: WOS 643 WOS stays 4AD2 Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted Friday at 08:18 PM Report Posted Friday at 08:18 PM Lake Creek 1686 Montgomery 1469 Livingston 1107 Bridge City 892 Kirbyville 431 Teague 363 Woodville 363 New Waverly 324 Quote
gogo173489 Posted Friday at 09:31 PM Report Posted Friday at 09:31 PM 1 hour ago, AggiesAreWe said: Lake Creek 1686 Montgomery 1469 Livingston 1107 Bridge City 892 Kirbyville 431 Teague 363 Woodville 363 New Waverly 324 So BC lost nearly 50 kids? Quote
pdawg119 Posted Friday at 09:34 PM Report Posted Friday at 09:34 PM 58 minutes ago, lcm93 said: Aledo 2404 Aledo is almost certain to be 6A next year. Quote
lcm93 Posted Friday at 09:50 PM Report Posted Friday at 09:50 PM 15 minutes ago, pdawg119 said: Aledo is almost certain to be 6A next year. They need to stay in 6a!! Quote
DukeS Posted Friday at 10:36 PM Report Posted Friday at 10:36 PM I’m surprised to see that Montgomery lost about 100 kids and LC basically stayed the same compared to two years ago. Quote
Vini vidi Posted Friday at 11:05 PM Report Posted Friday at 11:05 PM Atascocita turning in 3588 surprised me down 250+ since last realignment Quote
Darth Texas Posted yesterday at 03:44 AM Report Posted yesterday at 03:44 AM Anyone seen numbers for PNG and Nederland? Quote
navydawg31 Posted yesterday at 06:11 AM Report Posted yesterday at 06:11 AM Man seems to me most of the coverage area schools #’s dropped… and seeing the state wide #s strong feeling 7A will be here in 2 years… Quote
purpleeagle Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago On 10/24/2025 at 11:49 AM, AverageJoe86 said: When are the numbers due? By Friday the 31st? They have until Nov. 7th to turn in numbers Quote
purpleeagle Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago 14 hours ago, gogo173489 said: So BC lost nearly 50 kids? Newton 283 Quote
purpleeagle Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago On 10/28/2025 at 1:24 PM, DukeS said: This might be an unpopular opinion but the idea of d1 and d2 during the regular is ridiculous for travel and budget purposes. 2-3 hour drives to play some district games is insane. I read where teams that travel over 150 miles only win 16% of the time. If that is true then UIL is giving a disadvantage to those teams traveling that far. Quote
Back2swag Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago 2 hours ago, purpleeagle said: I read where teams that travel over 150 miles only win 16% of the time. If that is true then UIL is giving a disadvantage to those teams traveling that far. Hardin Should be placed in Newton/Woodville district . They are going d2 Quote
Eagles12 Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 1 hour ago, Back2swag said: Hardin Should be placed in Newton/Woodville district . They are going d2 Hardin is 2 below the cutoff from last time. I’d say it’s 50/50 at best that they go down Quote
gogo173489 Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 1 hour ago, Eagles12 said: Hardin is 2 below the cutoff from last time. I’d say it’s 50/50 at best that they go down Agree. If the cutoffs go down like some have suggested then Hardin will be D2 Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 3 minutes ago, gogo173489 said: Agree. If the cutoffs go down like some have suggested then Hardin will be D2 Hmmmm..... if the cutoffs go down, then that probably keeps Hardin DI. If they go up from last realignment, that helps Hardin go down to D2. Quote
gogo173489 Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 8 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said: Hmmmm..... if the cutoffs go down, then that probably keeps Hardin DI. If they go up from last realignment, that helps Hardin go down to D2. Correct. I had that backwards Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.