Jump to content

It’s Hammer Time


UT alum

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Bobcat1 said:

What do you think should be the  consequences for this, if anything?

I don’t know… but a big part of me says that you-know-who should probably never again have top secret clearance. And the American voters should take care of that. Unfortunately most of Trump’s loyalists can’t fog a mirror, so I guess it’ll just need to play itself out. 
 

The Dems are playing the rs like a fiddle. They’re just making sure that trump voters don’t lose interest in him, because a vote for Trump is a vote for Democrats in power. And boy, those Trump voters are motivated today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

I don’t know… but a big part of me says that you-know-who should probably never again have top secret clearance. And the American voters should take care of that. Unfortunately most of Trump’s loyalists can’t fog a mirror, so I guess it’ll just need to play itself out. 
 

The Dems are playing the rs like a fiddle. They’re just making sure that trump voters don’t lose interest in him, because a vote for Trump is a vote for Democrats in power. And boy, those Trump voters are motivated today. 

Your first sentence referring to biden?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Jeff Clark, Former US DOJ Double Ass’t AG:
 
"I'm beginning to read the indictment against Trump. But even three pages in, it's clear that the leaks that preceded the indictment are far too close to what is actually being pleaded by DOJ to be a coincidence.
 
For example, in paragraph 6a on page 3, we hear about the recording of the Bedminster call, which the MSNBC's of the world have been beating a dead horse about for quite a while based on such leaks.
 
 
This means that Trump lawyers could not possibly be the source of the leaks.
 
Ergo, the leaks are coming from DOJ. They must be investigated and punished.
 
Also, this is grounds for granting a motion highlighting jury pool poisoning and dismissing the indictment before it reaches even its one-month birthday.
 
All of this is so outrageous; it shocks the conscience. It's fundamentally anti-American!
 
Trump Witch Hunt Number ... what?
 
I've lost count. Let's call it Trump Witch Hunt #99.
 
Indictment available here. Read it for yourself.
This is the hidden content, please
 
 
This is the hidden content, please
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BS Wildcats said:

That’s also what I was doing with that reply.  Isn’t it strange they never say anything about the laws the joe biden crime family syndicate have broken.

Here’s the thing… there’s never any proof of those allegations “oh, yeah? Well Hannity has an unnamed source that says that he heard from a computer repair guy that there were Hunter Biden was trying to get parking tickets fixed. Biden should be impeached!”

If y’all want to start a thread to talk about Biden’s (or even Hunter’s) indictment(s) or impeachments(s) if that day ever comes, I’m down. But until then, shut up about it. 
 

Trump get indicted…. “Let’s not talk about this  indictment, let’s pretend Biden got indicted and talk about that instead.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

Here’s the thing… there’s never any proof of those allegations “oh, yeah? Well Hannity has an unnamed source that says that he heard from a computer repair guy that there were Hunter Biden was trying to get parking tickets fixed. Biden should be impeached!”

If y’all want to start a thread to talk about Biden’s (or even Hunter’s) indictment(s) or impeachments(s) if that day ever comes, I’m down. But until then, shut up about it. 
 

Trump get indicted…. “Let’s not talk about this  indictment, let’s pretend Biden got indicted and talk about that instead.”

Sorry Bud you can’t pick and choose what laws you want to follow and when you want to follow them depending on the president.

Here is some Copy and Paste for Breakfast.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Unwoke said:

Sorry Bud you can’t pick and choose what laws you want to follow and when you want to follow them depending on the president.

Here is some Copy and Paste for Breakfast.

 

Ok, so when Trump told the reporter “I’m not even supposed to have these” he was wrong?

 

Y’all so badly want for Trump to be right on this one that your arguments are getting more and more unhinged. If Jessie Waters is right and the DOJ is wrong, then a judge will clear the air. Regardless, if trump doesn’t understand the law as well as Waters, then the right guy for job got elected in 2020. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Ok, so when Trump told the reporter “I’m not even supposed to have these” he was wrong?

 

Y’all so badly want for Trump to be right on this one that your arguments are getting more and more unhinged. If Jessie Waters is right and the DOJ is wrong, then a judge will clear the air. Regardless, if trump doesn’t understand the law as well as Waters, then the right guy for job got elected in 2020. 

😘

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Here’s the thing… there’s never any proof of those allegations “oh, yeah? Well Hannity has an unnamed source that says that he heard from a computer repair guy that there were Hunter Biden was trying to get parking tickets fixed. Biden should be impeached!”

If y’all want to start a thread to talk about Biden’s (or even Hunter’s) indictment(s) or impeachments(s) if that day ever comes, I’m down. But until then, shut up about it. 
 

Trump get indicted…. “Let’s not talk about this  indictment, let’s pretend Biden got indicted and talk about that instead.”

You might tell your kid to shut up, but I’ll be damned if I will.  You know full well the biden’s are crooked as hell, but you don’t want to offend your liberal mouthpieces here. Why does the left constantly defend biden for his illegalities?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BS Wildcats said:

You might tell your kid to shut up, but I’ll be damned if I will.  You know full well the biden’s are crooked as hell, but you don’t want to offend your liberal mouthpieces here. Why does the left constantly defend biden for his illegalities?  

You’re arguing with someone that doesn’t think the Bidens are guilty of wrongdoing, I would have to say further debate is a waste of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said:

You’re arguing with someone that doesn’t think the Bidens are guilty of wrongdoing, I would have to say further debate is a waste of time.

He challenges us to start Biden threads. Why doesn’t anyone on the left, who is after Justice? He says that the evidence is not factual, yet he has been behind every Trump investigation which turned up nothing. In fact, the Steele dossier was fraudulent, but that’s ok with him. Didn’t require facts in that case. He simply loves to argue even when wrong. Being about Justice never enters the equation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, baddog said:

He challenges us to start Biden threads. Why doesn’t anyone on the left, who is after Justice? He says that the evidence is not factual, yet he has been begging every Trump investigation which turned up nothing. In fact, the Steele dossier was fraudulent, but that’s ok with him. Didn’t require facts in that case. He simply loves to argue even when wrong. Bring about Justice never enters the equation. 

He fell for everything that bug eyed Schiff, the penguin Nadler, and crying’ Schumer threw out there.  Just a typical liberal!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

President Trump was well within his rights to do what he did Under the "Presidential Records Act."  He said it's funny in the indictment the Feds never mention this act!  Imagine that!  Clinton, Bush and Yobama did the same thing.  NOTHING they've done to Trump has been true.  So, I guess, why start now?!  

Oh, BTW, the classified papers that JoeBama has, he got them while he was VP which is highly illegal!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...