Jump to content

Potential New Alignments


89Falcon

Recommended Posts

Quick glance at TEA numbers (based on the last cut offs) show Orangefield, Tarkington and Shepherd going up to 4AD2. Warren and Trinity going up to 3AD1. Seems like this would likely pull Woodville and Warren back into 3A1-10. Trinity into 3A1-9. 

Orangefield into 4A2-9, possibly pushing Jasper back North with something like Shepherd, Tarkington, Rusk, Center, Carthage, Jasper. 

thoughts? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 89Falcon said:

Quick glance at TEA numbers (based on the last cut offs) show Orangefield, Tarkington and Shepherd going up to 4AD2. Warren and Trinity going up to 3AD1. Seems like this would likely pull Woodville and Warren back into 3A1-10. Trinity into 3A1-9. 

Orangefield into 4A2-9, possibly pushing Jasper back North with something like Shepherd, Tarkington, Rusk, Center, Carthage, Jasper. 

thoughts? 

"Based on the last cutoffs" is the key phrase here... Oftentimes if the school's TEA numbers just barely put them over the last year's cutoffs, then there may be no change in reality as the current year's cutoffs get shifted up a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 89Falcon said:

Looks like PAM is currently 273 over the cut at 2198, 8th-11. 631 kids in 10th grade is blowing it up. 

You sure that isn't old info? 2198 was the exact number we had a few alignments ago. 

 

What's the link you're looking at, I want to check it out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

You sure that isn't old info? 2198 was the exact number we had a few alignments ago. 

 

What's the link you're looking at, I want to check it out. 

You could be right. However, the numbers look correct for the other districts. Sort it by "district" and "grade".

 

 

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 89Falcon said:

That is the number right now. 631 kids in 10th will be tough to overcome. 

I'm not worried because I also think new schools like the one in New Caney(North Fork I think the name is), will push that 5A/6A cutoff up to the point which WB and United will be in 5A Div 1 which will put PA back in reg 3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 89Falcon said:

Quick glance at TEA numbers (based on the last cut offs) show Orangefield, Tarkington and Shepherd going up to 4AD2. Warren and Trinity going up to 3AD1. Seems like this would likely pull Woodville and Warren back into 3A1-10. Trinity into 3A1-9. 

Orangefield into 4A2-9, possibly pushing Jasper back North with something like Shepherd, Tarkington, Rusk, Center, Carthage, Jasper. 

thoughts? 

Unless they keep upping the numbers  . Orangefield , Shepherd & Tarkington staying 3A . I think the number stops at 544 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For reference, these are the current alignment cutoff numbers.

6A         2225 and up

5A D I   1925 – 2224

5A D II  1300 – 1924

4A D I     880 – 1299

4A D II    545 – 879

3A D I     360 – 544

3A D II    250 – 359

2A D I   164.5 – 249

2A D II    105 – 164.4

1A D I     59.5 – 104.9

1A D II    59.4 and below

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

For reference, these are the current alignment cutoff numbers.

6A         2225 and up

5A D I   1925 – 2224

5A D II  1300 – 1924

4A D I     880 – 1299

4A D II    545 – 879

3A D I     360 – 544

3A D II    250 – 359

2A D I   164.5 – 249

2A D II    105 – 164.4

1A D I     59.5 – 104.9

1A D II    59.4 and below

Yep, that was the cut numbers that I based my projections. To me, the real question is what 4AD2 will look like. The addition of OF, Shepherd and Tarkington mess up the 4AD2 numbers for the region. Rusk, Center, Carthage are the only ones close that can fill out a district. Suppose they could add Madisonville again. I know Center would like to split from Carthage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 89Falcon said:

Would need to know what middle schools feed into the high school. They had 363 in the 9th grade.

From my understanding currently only Woodridge Forest Middle school feeds into West Fork. However that's completely based off of conversations with friends of ours that live there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, 89Falcon said:

Shepherd is over 600 8th-11. OF and Tarkington well past the cut

Unless I'm looking at something wrong, the number I come up with for Tarkington is 556 and thus puts us only 11 kids over just based on the enrollment numbers from the website you provided. I think the avg line move over the past few years has been about 8% of the bottom number so that would put the estimated cutoff at around 570. Don't get me wrong even that would put us really close to the cutoff. Not trying to be argumentative, just wondering where you're coming up with Tarkington will be well above 600+ kids from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PrairieMan said:

Unless I'm looking at something wrong, the number I come up with for Tarkington is 556 and thus puts us only 11 kids over just based on the enrollment numbers from the website you provided. I think the avg line move over the past few years has been about 8% of the bottom number so that would put the estimated cutoff at around 570. Don't get me wrong even that would put us really close to the cutoff. Not trying to be argumentative, just wondering where you're coming up with Tarkington will be well above 600+ kids from?

Never said Tarkington would be over 600 kids. Shepherd is the one that will be over 600. If the cut off went to 570 that would likely save Tarkington. My initial projections were based upon existing cut off numbers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,926
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...