Jump to content

Embattled Rockwall-Heath football coach resigns after multiple students diagnosed with rhabdo, officials say


Bobcat1

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Coach_Izzy said:

I take it you never played or coached nor ran a HS boot camp... Just like the rest of the folks on here commenting on things they don’t know about. That’s what’s silly 

Rest of us?  My apologies.  Shall I contact the university where i recieved it to rescind my doctorate from the College of Health and Human Performance and resign my position as a college professor in a Kinesiology department?  

Since you like to throw your resume out, I feel obligated to do the same. 

I bow to your superior knowledge of the Rockwall situation due to knowing the workout program at North Shore. 

The person that called you silly was wrong. Silly doesn't begin to explain your vast lack of knowledge on so many levels.  Promise you...you were not a "member" of the coaching staff at North Shore....you were a tolerated person with a contract in the district. 

I'll go gutter with you until the moderators stop us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, myrecordwashorrible said:

Rest of us?  My apologies.  Shall I contact the university where i recieved it to rescind my doctorate from the College of Health and Human Performance and resign my position as a college professor in a Kinesiology department?  

Since you like to throw your resume out, I feel obligated to do the same. 

I bow to your superior knowledge of the Rockwall situation due to knowing the workout program at North Shore. 

The person that called you silly was wrong. Silly doesn't begin to explain your vast lack of knowledge on so many levels.  Promise you...you were not a "member" of the coaching staff at North Shore....you were a tolerated person with a contract in the district. 

I'll go gutter with you until the moderators stop us. 

Lol please tell me how this has anything to do with football or running a football program/boot camp? The fact that you actually believe that kids were forced to do almost 400 push ups in a 60 minute athletic period let’s me know you should probably stick to being a professor and stop talking about things you have no clue about. 
 

FYI I actually know a coach on the Rockwall staff & was told about this situation first hand. Unlike you I don’t get on here and speak on *things* I have no clue about. 

And I stand by what I said, just a complaint from a few soft  kids who ran home to mommy because they couldn’t handle the workouts. This same boot camp that Coach Harrell was running has been going on at Rockwall for YEARS, and up until now there were no issues. 

There’s a reason majority of the team players & parents fought to keep him in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Coach_Izzy said:

Lol please tell me how this has anything to do with football or running a football program/boot camp? The fact that you actually believe that kids were forced to do almost 400 push ups in a 60 minute athletic period let’s me know you should probably stick to being a professor and stop talking about things you have no clue about. 
 

FYI I actually know a coach on the Rockwall staff & was told about this situation first hand. Unlike you I don’t get on here and speak on sh*t I have no clue about. 

And I stand by what I said, just a complaint from a few soft a** kids who ran home to mommy because they couldn’t handle the workouts. This same boot camp that Coach Harrell was running has been going on at Rockwall for YEARS, and up until now there were no issues. 

There’s a reason majority of the team players & parents fought to keep him in place.

No!  Enjoying being like you.  I know it all!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BEARCPA said:

Call me crazy, but a Kinesiology professor is exactly the person I’d want to get an explanation from regarding the causes and effects of rhabdo. 

You sure you wouldn't rather take medical advice from a silly dude named Coach Izzy?

As unto "Izzy really that silly?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BEARCPA said:

Call me crazy, but a Kinesiology professor is exactly the person I’d want to get an explanation from regarding the causes and effects of rhabdo. 

You actually believe some HS kids did 368 push ups in 60 mins? Common sense has nothing to do with a degree, you would think more than just 4 or 5 kids would’ve been hospitalized if that was the case right? Also you would think parents & players wouldn’t come to the defense of a coach who would put multiple kids in the hospital. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Coach_Izzy said:

You actually believe some HS kids did 368 push ups in 60 mins? Common sense has nothing to do with a degree, you would think more than just 4 or 5 kids would’ve been hospitalized if that was the case right? 

Common sense tells me that the 15 year-olds that were hospitalized were probably not as strong and physically developed as the 16-17 year-olds doing the workout. Being a coach, you should know that not every kid has the exact same physiological makeup as the next, especially when looking at different age groups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BEARCPA said:

Common sense tells me that the 15 year-olds that were hospitalized were probably not as strong and physically developed as the 16-17 year-olds doing the workout. Being a coach, you should know that not every kid has the exact same physiological makeup as the next, especially when looking at different age groups.

Lol again you didn’t answer my question, do you really believe a bunch of HS kids actually done 368 push ups? No matter the age if that actually happened I would think more than just 4 or 5 kids would’ve been in the hospital. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Coach_Izzy said:

Lol again you didn’t answer my question, do you really believe a bunch of HS kids actually done 368 push ups? No matter the age if that actually happened I would think more than just 4 or 5 kids would’ve been in the hospital. 

So you're agreeing some of the hospitalized kids' weren't ready for that workout?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

So you're agreeing some of the hospitalized kids' weren't ready for that workout?

Exactly what I stated the other day.  One must have progressive overload to build to extreme workouts. 

No kid did 300 plus push ups. However, a kid can get in push up position and collapse to the ground over and over. Eccentric overload!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Coach_Izzy said:

Lol again you didn’t answer my question, do you really believe a bunch of HS kids actually done 368 push ups? No matter the age if that actually happened I would think more than just 4 or 5 kids would’ve been in the hospital. 

I do not know the strength & conditioning levels of hs kids these days, but whether or not they actually did that specific amount of push-ups is besides the point. The point is that kids had to be hospitalized for 10+ days because the coach made them do more reps than their bodies could physically handle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BEARCPA said:

I do not know the strength & conditioning levels of hs kids these days, but whether or not they actually did that specific amount of push-ups is besides the point. The point is that kids had to be hospitalized for 10+ days because the coach made them do more reps than their bodies could physically handle. 

How is that besides the point when that’s what the parents accused Coach Harrell of doing? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Coach_Izzy said:

How is that besides the point when that’s what the parents accused Coach Harrell of doing? 

Doesn't matter if they did 168 push-ups, 268 push-up, or 368 push-ups. The kids had to stay in the hospital for 10+ days because Coach Harrell took the punishment too far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,937
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • 3 yrs ago LCM and Vidor played in Vidor for a play in game.  Game was on a Saturday and started around 1 or 2p.
    • It would shock me beyond belief if he tried to. Now, I hope and pray he appoints people that will investigate, charge, and imprison anyone found guilty of the crimes against him...including treason. I would be all for a special task force charge solely with the task of investigating crimes against Trump. Of course the Democrats will be screaming bloody murder that Trump is weaponizing the government against them. We all know the story. From a cursory standpoint, there seems to be a plethora of evidence to lock up many Democrats for a long time. Unless this is done, I see no end to destruction of our political system...and this country.
    • There is a difference, but I wouldn't at all put it past Trump to do so if he had the infrastructure in place to get away with it like the Dems currently do.  With the amount of effort he's invested in ruining those republicans who've opposed him, it wouldn't surprise me one bit.
    • I think it will be an interesting case and could potentially come up for appeal on a different constitutional point.  The Supreme Court has ruled in the past that the government doesn’t have to take possession of property in order to take it under the meaning of the Fifth Amendment.  If they take away the enjoyment or use of the property, it is no different than physically seizing it to build a highway for example. In a lawsuit as opposed to a criminal trial, a person/plaintiff doesn’t have to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt but rather by a preponderance of evidence or “more likely” to have happened. Maybe it could be described as more likely yes than no or 51%-49%.  ”IF” it can be shown at a trial by a preponderance of evidence that Texas more likely yes than no caused the flooding with its engineering of the project, the people suing might have a case. But…. Does that alone win the case under the Fifth Amendment taking clause? I am not so sure. In US v Causby the Supreme Court ruled that the US government took a man’s property by flying airplanes over it. It was a public airport lawfully leased by the US in WWII and used to fly heavy bombers from it. Causby had an egg farm and the extremely loud noise of some airplanes under full power and sometimes at night with a landing lights being so close, it bothered and scared the family and damaged his egg farm production. Some chickens died and some quit laying eggs due to the extreme disturbances and lights at night. The Supreme Court ruled in Causby’s favor saying that the US had taken away the enjoyment and use of his land even though they didn’t physically seize it. The use of the land was hampered and that was enough for the taking clause under the Fifth Amendment. So in the IH-10 case, did Texas take away the use or enjoyment of the property?  A point of Causby was that the military bombers at a public airport was certainly for “public use”. The planes were public/taxpayers’ and the airport and lease were taxpayers’ property so the “public” definitely used it   My question in this lawsuit against Texas, even in they can prove the damage, was the damage (like in Causby) for “public use”? If not would it then not be a Fifth Amendment case but rather a state law case?  If Texas law denies such a lawsuit under state sovereignty and the families can’t prove a Fifth Amendment case of “public use”, could they prove the damages but still lose the case under state law? I haven’t read that anywhere and just thinking out loud. I could be way off base. But I think it could be interesting…..
    • Both sides...that is, everyone tries to get their people elected. Trump has not weaponized the government to bankrupt and imprison his political opponents. Night and day difference for me.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...