Jump to content

Hardin-Jefferson 45 Huffman-Hargrave 42/FINAL


Recommended Posts

Not too sure about the hangover part. Honestly these teams are pretty evenly matched and throw Hamshire Fannett in there as well. None of these teams have established themselves as truly dominant and I can't see anyone making it to the 3rd round. HJ is a little better than the rest, but nothing like they have been in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • AggiesAreWe changed the title to Hardin-Jefferson 45 Huffman-Hargrave 42/FINAL

I don’t complain much anymore.  But the officiating tonight was completely ridiculous.  It was literally 5 vs. 8 in the first half.  Samaha played a total of 4 minutes through 3 quarters.  One minute for every foul he had.  Sheldon had 3 in first half as well.  I’ll give Huffman credit as they  had a great game plan in first half and executed it to perfection.   Coach Davis made some halftime adjustments.  And were able to hit some big shots from Sheldon and Melvo in the second half. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, FALCONS2026 said:

Not too sure about the hangover part. Honestly these teams are pretty evenly matched and throw Hamshire Fannett in there as well. None of these teams have established themselves as truly dominant and I can't see anyone making it to the 3rd round. HJ is a little better than the rest, but nothing like they have been in the past.

Huffman is 0-3 now against HJ and HF (with HF winning by double digits on the road). Huffman also 0-2 against BC and LCM, two possible first round playoff opponents.  I would say they are the best of the rest in that district but a notch below the other two.  Definitely played the Hawks close twice though and should be commended.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,924
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined


  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...