Jump to content

Alyssa Milano Blasted By Conservatives, Elon Musk After Trading In Tesla For Volkswagen: 'Founded by Nazis'!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

It was rebranded after WW2 by a man from Britian. 

 

Founded in 1937 by the 

This is the hidden content, please
 under the 
This is the hidden content, please
 and revived into a global brand post-
This is the hidden content, please
 by the BRITISH 
This is the hidden content, please
, it is known for the iconic 
This is the hidden content, please
 and serves as the flagship brand of the 
This is the hidden content, please
, the largest automotive manufacturer by worldwide sales in 2016 and 2017.
This is the hidden content, please

Today, the Volkswagen group owns dozens of high-performance automakers, including Lamborghini, Bugatti, Porsche, and Bentley. The question of who owns Audi and who makes Audi is simply answered with: The Volkswagen Auto Group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Big girl said:

It was rebranded after WW2 by a man from Britian. 

 

Founded in 1937 by the 

This is the hidden content, please
 under the 
This is the hidden content, please
 and revived into a global brand post-
This is the hidden content, please
 by the BRITISH 
This is the hidden content, please
, it is known for the iconic 
This is the hidden content, please
 and serves as the flagship brand of the 
This is the hidden content, please
, the largest automotive manufacturer by worldwide sales in 2016 and 2017.
This is the hidden content, please

Today, the Volkswagen group owns dozens of high-performance automakers, including Lamborghini, Bugatti, Porsche, and Bentley. The question of who owns Audi and who makes Audi is simply answered with: The Volkswagen Auto Group.

It was still founded by Hitler, you can’t change that.  Just like you can’t change the fact the KKK was founded by the Dims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Big girl said:

It was rebranded after WW2 by a man from Britian. 

 

Founded in 1937 by the 

This is the hidden content, please
 under the 
This is the hidden content, please
 and revived into a global brand post-
This is the hidden content, please
 by the BRITISH 
This is the hidden content, please
, it is known for the iconic 
This is the hidden content, please
 and serves as the flagship brand of the 
This is the hidden content, please
, the largest automotive manufacturer by worldwide sales in 2016 and 2017.
This is the hidden content, please

Today, the Volkswagen group owns dozens of high-performance automakers, including Lamborghini, Bugatti, Porsche, and Bentley. The question of who owns Audi and who makes Audi is simply answered with: The Volkswagen Auto Group.

With this post, you have pulled ahead of Milano.  Congrats. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Big girl said:

It was rebranded after WW2 by a man from Britian. 

 

Founded in 1937 by the 

This is the hidden content, please
 under the 
This is the hidden content, please
 and revived into a global brand post-
This is the hidden content, please
 by the BRITISH 
This is the hidden content, please
, it is known for the iconic 
This is the hidden content, please
 and serves as the flagship brand of the 
This is the hidden content, please
, the largest automotive manufacturer by worldwide sales in 2016 and 2017.
This is the hidden content, please

Today, the Volkswagen group owns dozens of high-performance automakers, including Lamborghini, Bugatti, Porsche, and Bentley. The question of who owns Audi and who makes Audi is simply answered with: The Volkswagen Auto Group.

She didn't buy a vehicle made by the Nazi Party. What does that have to do with her stance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Big girl said:

She said that he is a racist. He currently owns Telsa. The Nazi Party currently have nothing to do with the Volkswagon Brand.

What makes Musk a racist? Why are you a racist? Did you even read the article or just scan for words with less than five letters? I currently have nothing to do with slavery, but I haven’t been let off the hook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/30/2022 at 10:57 AM, Big girl said:

She didn't buy a vehicle made by the Nazi Party. What does that have to do with her stance?

Again, why does anyone, especially true Americans, take a stance against Mush? I love this guy……


Apple vs Musk wont end well for Apple. 

If apple axes Twitter from the app-store over free speech Elon will make his own smartphone, apps, wild interface technology with satellite internet that would make Apple, cell towers, appstores, cell service providers obsolete as Henry Ford made horse carts overnight. 

Tesla smartphones would have the best battery technology on the planet, Android is Open Source technology so anyone can take it and make anything they want out of it. Tesla has great interface technology and even developing Neuralink for a brain interface. Not to mention the last bite out of the apple is Starlink internet Musk owns which will bypass phone service and cell towers with no dead zones. 

The Big tech-Democrat censorship war on Musk is about to crash and burn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/30/2022 at 8:12 PM, baddog said:

What makes Musk a racist? Why are you a racist? Did you even read the article or just scan for words with less than five letters? I currently have nothing to do with slavery, but I haven’t been let off the hook.

You need to ask her why she thinks he is a racist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Big girl said:

I am not a racist  He is projecting.

I just find it funny that you seem to think Trump voters are racist.  I could say the same about about BLM supporters, whether I have any evidence or not.  I think that’s how you and the other liberals on this site come up your opinions on racism claims.  You have no idea what others view on race are, y’all just base your claims on the fact that we voted for Trump.  Your potus is more racist than anybody on here.  Were you not offended when he said if you are black, but didn’t vote for him, that you are not black enough?  Or, do give him the benefit of the doubt, such as the MSM does daily?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,937
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • 3 yrs ago LCM and Vidor played in Vidor for a play in game.  Game was on a Saturday and started around 1 or 2p.
    • It would shock me beyond belief if he tried to. Now, I hope and pray he appoints people that will investigate, charge, and imprison anyone found guilty of the crimes against him...including treason. I would be all for a special task force charged solely with the task of investigating crimes against Trump. Of course the Democrats will be screaming bloody murder that Trump is weaponizing the government against them. We all know the story. From a cursory standpoint, there seems to be a plethora of evidence to lock up many Democrats for a long time. Unless this is done, I see no end to destruction of our political system...and this country.
    • There is a difference, but I wouldn't at all put it past Trump to do so if he had the infrastructure in place to get away with it like the Dems currently do.  With the amount of effort he's invested in ruining those republicans who've opposed him, it wouldn't surprise me one bit.
    • I think it will be an interesting case and could potentially come up for appeal on a different constitutional point.  The Supreme Court has ruled in the past that the government doesn’t have to take possession of property in order to take it under the meaning of the Fifth Amendment.  If they take away the enjoyment or use of the property, it is no different than physically seizing it to build a highway for example. In a lawsuit as opposed to a criminal trial, a person/plaintiff doesn’t have to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt but rather by a preponderance of evidence or “more likely” to have happened. Maybe it could be described as more likely yes than no or 51%-49%.  ”IF” it can be shown at a trial by a preponderance of evidence that Texas more likely yes than no caused the flooding with its engineering of the project, the people suing might have a case. But…. Does that alone win the case under the Fifth Amendment taking clause? I am not so sure. In US v Causby the Supreme Court ruled that the US government took a man’s property by flying airplanes over it. It was a public airport lawfully leased by the US in WWII and used to fly heavy bombers from it. Causby had an egg farm and the extremely loud noise of some airplanes under full power and sometimes at night with a landing lights being so close, it bothered and scared the family and damaged his egg farm production. Some chickens died and some quit laying eggs due to the extreme disturbances and lights at night. The Supreme Court ruled in Causby’s favor saying that the US had taken away the enjoyment and use of his land even though they didn’t physically seize it. The use of the land was hampered and that was enough for the taking clause under the Fifth Amendment. So in the IH-10 case, did Texas take away the use or enjoyment of the property?  A point of Causby was that the military bombers at a public airport was certainly for “public use”. The planes were public/taxpayers’ and the airport and lease were taxpayers’ property so the “public” definitely used it   My question in this lawsuit against Texas, even in they can prove the damage, was the damage (like in Causby) for “public use”? If not would it then not be a Fifth Amendment case but rather a state law case?  If Texas law denies such a lawsuit under state sovereignty and the families can’t prove a Fifth Amendment case of “public use”, could they prove the damages but still lose the case under state law? I haven’t read that anywhere and just thinking out loud. I could be way off base. But I think it could be interesting…..
    • Both sides...that is, everyone tries to get their people elected. Trump has not weaponized the government to bankrupt and imprison his political opponents. Night and day difference for me.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...