Jump to content

Bi-District - Woodville vs East Chambers Predictions/GAME MOVED TO SATURDAY, 2pm


Bobcat1

Recommended Posts

This will be a dangerous game for Woodville. EC has the coaches to pick this bird clean. I see them taking advantage of a overly aggressive Defensive line and trying to turn it into a shoot out where they know Woodville will not be able to put up 50 + points . You are now at a point where it takes offensive genius to win games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SportsFever409 said:

Woodville has a lot of talent, but you never know what team is gonna show up. EC has been playing better these last few weeks, but turnovers at the wrong time kill them as I believe will determine this game. 34-21 Woodville.

Wouldn't surprise me if EC did pull this one off though. 

I like that prediction. I was thinking more like 28-14 though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

East Chambers played their usual weak schedule. Have not beat a team with a winning record. Woodville wins big.    
second round will probably be Hitchcock should be a decent game with Woodville wining by one or two scores. Third round will probably be Franklin.

Good luck Woodville hoping for a deep run. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, purpleeagle said:

East Chambers played their usual weak schedule. Have not beat a team with a winning record. Woodville wins big.    
second round will probably be Hitchcock should be a decent game with Woodville wining by one or two scores. Third round will probably be Franklin.

Good luck Woodville hoping for a deep run. 

Hitchcock will be tough

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • AggiesAreWe changed the title to Bi-District - Woodville vs East Chambers Predictions/GAME MOVED TO SATURDAY, 2pm

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,932
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...