Jump to content

Fort Bend Marshall @ Dayton

Reagan

By Reagan
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

jayhawk

jayhawk

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, Red Boyou said:

Hoping Dayton gets the win but I just don't think they have the defense to pull it off.

Have to agree- maybe if we get some turnovers like we did against Tx City we might have a chance. ( and we are good at creating turnovers) but FBM is stacked with more athletes than us- hoping for a competitive game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rez Ipsa

Rez Ipsa

Posted
Posted

If Dayton plays mistake free, they have the offense to keep it interesting. I think they have a slightly better offense than PnG , not just statistically but in terms of what they have in the toolbox. They can move the ball all over the field and give FBM trouble. And Dayton’s defense is “pretty” good.  Not great. But if they can get some turnovers get a few 3 and outs, they can keep it close 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
89Falcon

89Falcon

Posted
Posted
53 minutes ago, FrodoNDN said:

Dayton has a chance, If we didn't make the mental mistakes in this game we could have possibly won. Tough but possible. With that said, if Dayton wins how does that affect the playoff situation?

 

Depends on the score. If Dayton wins by 11 or more, Dayton will be DC. A win by Dayton of 1-10 points, Dayton will be 2nd. Dayton loses it is: FBM 1, PNG 2, Dayton 3. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • tvc184
      It’s kinda weird…

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Actually I wasn’t responding to your comment. It was funny. I was using your comment to take issue with baddog’s comparison. 😎
    • navydawg31
      Nederland is open, Barrow Resigns

      By navydawg31 · Posted

      I mean the baseball kids aren’t even doing football after school, they go to baseball… baseball kids get about a hour during the period. 
    • tvc184
      US Supreme Court case from southeast Texas

      By tvc184 · Posted

      That is yet to be determined in trial. ”Taking” in the Fifth Amendment doesn’t mean ownership, title changing hands, etc. A government can “take” your property without “taking” your properties.  That has been true.  This issue is, did Texas take the property under the Fifth Amendment and subsequent Supreme Court rulings and not the dictionary definition of “taking”. As always in the law, definitions matter. 
    • CardinalBacker
      It’s kinda weird…

      By CardinalBacker · Posted

      Wrong again. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   The day that Trump took office, our nation debt stood at 19.9 Trillion dollars (End of Q4, 2016).  After his tax cuts (without corresponding cuts in spending), the national debt stood at 23.2 Trillion dollars at the end of Q1 of 2020 that was the Start of COVID, FYI... Or a total increase in debt of almost 17% during Trump's first three years (and one quarter) in office.  At the end of his reign (with COVID spending for which Trump himself signed off on) was at 27.7 Trillion Dollars.  That's a 39% increase in the National Debt while Trump was in office.  For further reference, Biden inherited a 27.7 Trillion dollar debt to start.  At the end of Q4 2023, the debt stands at 34 Trillion.  That's an increase of 19% over the first three years. I know that math and facts hurt your feelings, but Trump was horrible for the country before he allowed "them Dirty Democrats to shut down the economy."  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the country" doesn't know the first thing about micro/macro economics or the effects of deficit spending.  Trump hurt us like no other president, period.  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the economy" is actually stating for the rest of us with some sense "I don't know what I'm talking about."
    • baddog
      It’s kinda weird…

      By baddog · Posted

      But of course you wouldn’t understand the saying. You’re so clever. Your education precedes you. 

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...