Jump to content

DCTF Week 7 State Rankings


AggiesAreWe

Recommended Posts

This is the hidden content, please

Coverage area teams in this week's rankings

6A

#1 North Shore

#7 Atascocita

#25 Summer Creek

 

5A DI

#5 PA Memorial

 

5A DII

#3 FB Marshall

 

4A DI

#7 Lumberton

 

4A DII

#5 Silsbee

 

3A DII

#3 Newton

 

2A DI

#1 Timpson

#10 Centerville

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol. no love for Jasper after beating the #9 4A DII team.

HF found their way into the spotlight ( and I was one of the first to give them props) after playing a relatively weak schedule to that point.

in all honesty I think we are headed in that direction(top ten) but in reality not one as of now. It just tickles me seeing some of the "ranked" teams this year and the roads that got them there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Dirty_but_Dazzling said:

lol. no love for Jasper after beating the #8 4A DII team.

HF found their way into the spotlight ( and I was one of the first to give them props) after playing a relatively weak schedule to that point.

in all honesty I think we are headed in that direction(top ten) but in reality not one as of now. It just tickles me seeing some of the "ranked" teams this year and the roads that got them there.

What you trying to say about my Brahmas 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

L-town still way over ranked.  I said that a few weeks ago, and that dominant 6-point win over a 3A team with a .500 record did not change my opinion.  They have played a weak schedule, with a bad loss to the only team they'll face all year that will end the season with a quality record. Being in a so/so district will work out to their advantage, rankings-wise at least.   Before a certain fan or two come on to defend their honor, I've also previously stated that I think Lumberton has a good team this year, one of the better teams in our coverage area. I just have no idea how DCTF has arrived to the conclusion that they're a top-10 team in 4A-D1.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

L-town still way over ranked.  I said that a few weeks ago, and that dominant 6-point win over a 3A team with a .500 record did not change my opinion.  They have played a weak schedule, with a bad loss to the only team they'll face all year that will end the season with a quality record. Being in a so/so district will work out to their advantage, rankings-wise at least.   Before a certain fan or two come on to defend their honor, I've also previously stated that I think Lumberton has a good team this year, one of the better teams in our coverage area. I just have no idea how DCTF has arrived to the conclusion that they're a top-10 team in 4A-D1.  

I agree

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

L-town still way over ranked.  I said that a few weeks ago, and that dominant 6-point win over a 3A team with a .500 record did not change my opinion.  They have played a weak schedule, with a bad loss to the only team they'll face all year that will end the season with a quality record. Being in a so/so district will work out to their advantage, rankings-wise at least.   Before a certain fan or two come on to defend their honor, I've also previously stated that I think Lumberton has a good team this year, one of the better teams in our coverage area. I just have no idea how DCTF has arrived to the conclusion that they're a top-10 team in 4A-D1.  

So essentially any ranking Lumberton gets until the playoffs we'll be considered way over ranked I guess....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

L-town still way over ranked.  I said that a few weeks ago, and that dominant 6-point win over a 3A team with a .500 record did not change my opinion.  They have played a weak schedule, with a bad loss to the only team they'll face all year that will end the season with a quality record. Being in a so/so district will work out to their advantage, rankings-wise at least.   Before a certain fan or two come on to defend their honor, I've also previously stated that I think Lumberton has a good team this year, one of the better teams in our coverage area. I just have no idea how DCTF has arrived to the conclusion that they're a top-10 team in 4A-D1.  

.400 team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, raideroldtimer said:

So essentially any ranking Lumberton gets until the playoffs we'll be considered way over ranked I guess....

As the #7 team in the state, Lumberton should blow out every team in their district.  A top 10 team should have no problem beating Vidor and Huffman by 28+ points.  I can assure you the other teams in the top-10 would not struggle to do so.  They should also be able to beat LCM by 2+ scores.  That's just the reality of things.  The other teams in the top-10 in 4A-D1 would beat Tatum by 30 points.  That's also the reality of things.  If Lumberton goes through the district and finishes 9-1 with blowout wins over Vidor and HH, and a convincing win over LCM, I'll agree that they're deserving of their ranking.  In 5 games Lumberton has played 2 teams that are awful, 2 teams that are pretty solid, and 1 team that is actually good.  The one good team they played beat them by three scores, and they beat the two decent teams by one score each.  One of those pretty good teams is 4A-D2, and will finish the year at 6-4, best case.  The other is 3A-D1 and will finish the year 6-4 best case as well.  1-score wins against pretty good teams in lower divisions don't scream out "Top Ten Ranking" to me. So all that said, my point is not that Lumberton is a bad team, it's that they're not deserving of their ranking, and really haven't done anything this year for me to understand how they've gotten it.  In our local 4A-D2 district they'd be in a tight race for 4th place.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Dirty_but_Dazzling said:

I remember Jasper being ranked # 1 and getting beat by Lincoln.

If my memory serves me right, Jasper has been ranked # 1 once or twice or many times.🤔

I'm sure at least once in the 80's. Y'all had some teams back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,937
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • There is a difference, but I wouldn't at all put it past Trump to do so if he had the infrastructure in place to get away with it like the Dems currently do.  With the amount of effort he's invested in ruining those republicans who've opposed him, it wouldn't surprise me one bit.
    • I think it will be an interesting case and could potentially come up for appeal on a different constitutional point.  The Supreme Court has ruled in the past that the government doesn’t have to take possession of property in order to take it under the meaning of the Fifth Amendment.  If they take away the enjoyment or use of the property, it is no different than physically seizing it to build a highway for example. In a lawsuit as opposed to a criminal trial, a person/plaintiff doesn’t have to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt but rather by a preponderance of evidence or “more likely” to have happened. Maybe it could be described as more likely yes than no or 51%-49%.  ”IF” it can be shown at a trial by a preponderance of evidence that Texas more likely yes than no caused the flooding with its engineering of the project, the people suing might have a case. But…. Does that alone win the case under the Fifth Amendment taking clause? I am not so sure. In US v Causby the Supreme Court ruled that the US government took a man’s property by flying airplanes over it. It was a public airport lawfully leased by the US in WWII and used to fly heavy bombers from it. Causby had an egg farm and the extremely loud noise of some airplanes under full power and sometimes at night with a landing lights being so close, it bothered and scared the family and damaged his egg farm production. Some chickens died and some quit laying eggs due to the extreme disturbances and lights at night. The Supreme Court ruled in Causby’s favor saying that the US had taken away the enjoyment and use of his land even though they didn’t physically seize it. The use of the land was hampered and that was enough for the taking clause under the Fifth Amendment. So in the IH-10 case, did Texas take away the use or enjoyment of the property?  A point of Causby was that the military bombers at a public airport was certainly for “public use”. The planes were public/taxpayers’ and the airport and lease were taxpayers’ property so the “public” definitely used it   My question in this lawsuit against Texas, even in they can prove the damage, was the damage (like in Causby) for “public use”? If not would it then not be a Fifth Amendment case but rather a state law case?  If Texas law denies such a lawsuit under state sovereignty and the families can’t prove a Fifth Amendment case of “public use”, could they prove the damages but still lose the case under state law? I haven’t read that anywhere and just thinking out loud. I could be way off base. But I think it could be interesting…..
    • Both sides...that is, everyone tries to get their people elected. Trump has not weaponized the government to bankrupt and imprison his political opponents. Night and day difference for me.
    • Surely you're aware of the great lengths Trump has gone to disrupt the elections and destroy the careers of republican politicians who haven't supported some of his most outlandish claims, or dared to question him or disagree with him about January 6.  You and I actually agree on this issue, although it must only go one way for you, because Trump's actions against republicans who didn't fall into lockstep with him is one of my biggest concerns about reelecting him.  The fact that he took action to affect literally hundreds of republican primaries from national elections down to municipal levels across the country, is concerning. It would've been one thing had he done it in an effort to help republicans win. Instead his purpose was to push out his perceived detractors and install MAGA politicians at every level of government in as many places as possible, and has resulted in a fractured republican party.
    • Lmao. No doubt. With a name like that, he would've gotten made fun of even if he was home-schooled.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...