Jump to content

UIL Rule Question


H-STING

Recommended Posts

My understanding is there’s no mercy rule for 11 man Football. So what is allowed and how does that work. Anytime after halftime coaches can agree to end contest? Are agree to just let the clock run? Coach wave’s across the field to the other coach  to say let the clock run? I noticed Newton was ahead big time at halftime, that triggered something. Also the Hemphill game they just let the clock run after the 3rd qtr. just a fan not a coach would like to understand what’s going on behind the scene with the coaches in games like this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, H-STING said:

My understanding is there’s no mercy rule for 11 man Football. So what is allowed and how does that work. Anytime after halftime coaches can agree to end contest? Are agree to just let the clock run? Coach wave’s across the field to the other coach  to say let the clock run? I noticed Newton was ahead big time at halftime, that triggered something. Also the Hemphill game they just let the clock run after the 3rd qtr. just a fan not a coach would like to understand what’s going on behind the scene with the coaches in games like this. 

this is the rule: 

Timing Adjustments—ARTICLE 2

Approved Ruling 3-2-2

I. At halftime the score is 56-0. The coaches and the referee agree that the third and fourth quarters should be shortened to 12 minutes each. The coaches also request that the second half be played with a “running clock,” i.e., that the game clock not be stopped. RULING: The remaining quarters may be shortened to 12 minutes each. However, the “running clock” is not allowed; normal clock rules apply for the entire game.

That being said as long as both coaches agree they just run the clock in high school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, deuces said:

this is the rule: 

Timing Adjustments—ARTICLE 2

Approved Ruling 3-2-2

I. At halftime the score is 56-0. The coaches and the referee agree that the third and fourth quarters should be shortened to 12 minutes each. The coaches also request that the second half be played with a “running clock,” i.e., that the game clock not be stopped. RULING: The remaining quarters may be shortened to 12 minutes each. However, the “running clock” is not allowed; normal clock rules apply for the entire game.

That being said as long as both coaches agree they just run the clock in high school.

Thanks 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/24/2022 at 2:17 PM, deuces said:

this is the rule: 

Timing Adjustments—ARTICLE 2

Approved Ruling 3-2-2

I. At halftime the score is 56-0. The coaches and the referee agree that the third and fourth quarters should be shortened to 12 minutes each. The coaches also request that the second half be played with a “running clock,” i.e., that the game clock not be stopped. RULING: The remaining quarters may be shortened to 12 minutes each. However, the “running clock” is not allowed; normal clock rules apply for the entire game.

That being said as long as both coaches agree they just run the clock in high school.

The remaining quarters may be shortened to 12 minutes each?

High school varsity contests are already played with 4 12 minute quarters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,899
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    gosikij
    Newest Member
    gosikij
    Joined


  • Posts

    • How do you know that Harrison is not a big opportunity? I don't really know him, but maybe just maybe he is what Liberty needs. I was just wondering what you know about Harrison that doesn't make him a big opportunity. 
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • The last 2 or so minutes are so true
    • Looking back at the exact wording, it seems like you are correct and it was the concrete barriers that were the ultimate problem. I mentioned it in my last comment, even if it was just the barriers, did Texas take his property? I think a case like US v. Causby might go a long way to proving his case. Causby had an egg farm and during World War II, the US government started flying four engine heavy bombers for the war effort, low over his farm at full power. The extremely loud noise killed a bunch of his chickens and caused many of the rest of them to quit laying eggs. Even though he legally still on the property, he sued, saying that the federal government had effectively “taken” the use of his property from him. The US Supreme Court sided with him, saying that for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment, the federal government had indeed taken away the use of his property. It wasn’t intentional but that didn’t matter. It seems like this case would fall somewhere along those lines.
    • That might have added to it but it said that they intentionally raised the roadway to help it act as a dam. Even if it was the dividers and no intent, did the state “take” his property without compensation? I think that it is interesting that a local landowner fought his case all the way to the US Supreme Court and won in a unanimous decision. So while he has not won his case yet, he won the right to have his day in court and possibly heard by a jury.     
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...