Jump to content

West Orange-Stark (27) @ Silsbee (48) - FINAL

jdawg03

By jdawg03
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

BADSANTA

BADSANTA

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, ladybug33 said:

I thought so. talent runs deep in that family. Chris Miller ate our lunch and  took our backpack.

Miller had 2 younger brothers who played for Silsbee around 2000. They were were twins. One rushed for 1000 and the other was a very good DB. Jonte and Donte Miller. Great family!. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 497
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

setxathlete14
setxathlete14

Shouldnt see any whining from WOS. This time last year alot where crying about wanting change over some nonsense signing petitions and what not...... Now they get it and complaining about new. Silsbee

Tyler Dixson
Tyler Dixson

JK Dobbins had less than 50 yards against Coach T defense. He plays well on Sundays (when healthy) A Coach Thompson defense  would not have let this happen 

BADSANTA
BADSANTA

Coach Hickman isn't being given a fair shake by most of you. WOS has a rich tradition and the community seems to be against this man after 5 games. WOS will get 2nd in district. You can't win em all f

LCMAlumtiger32

LCMAlumtiger32

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Tyler Dixson said:

JK Dobbins had less than 50 yards against Coach T defense. He plays well on Sundays (when healthy) A Coach Thompson defense  would not have let this happen 

With that defense that went to the state championship? Or the current players? Im not  disagreeing that T would have had a game plan but that kid is catching a ball with two defenders on top of him. Coach T can only do so much with the athletes that he has  on the field. Let me ask you this if Coach T is the defense Guru what happen in the state championship game against  Gilmer? Or last year yall couldn't stop the quarterback. WOS doesn't go 16-0 every year they do get beat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Silsbee92

Silsbee92

Posted
Posted

It was a good night in the pressbox.  CT himself showed up and I escorted Charlie Woodard to him. Those two shared some stories and had a good old time.  

Great game Mustangs.  I was expecting this type of game and it shows how much these two teams matter to this area.

Losing to Silsbee is not an  insult or season ending situation.... regardless of some of the posts on this thread.

I firmly believe the games against the Stangs have helped Silsbee prepare for deep playoff runs for many years.

Let it be the same and lets hope for another Regional Final matchup.

Miller is special and he obviously went off.  lol.  But several great catches were made by Cartwright and Elder.  Those passes were thrown by Brisbane who was on another level tonight!  Silsbee had over 600 yds offense tonight.

Defensively....Silsbee was lights out.  Penalties hurt their performance but make no mistake, those fellas was representing.

Last thing I will say on this game.....the Mustangs brought this out of those Tigers.  Very few teams have that effect.

I Respect Mustang Nation.

#TigerNation

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOSdrummer99

WOSdrummer99

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, LCMAlumtiger32 said:

but that kid is catching a ball with two defenders on top of him.

Maybe a better defense scheme and more pressure on QB, and the throw never gets there. We could what if all night.

Changes were made and we are seeing the benefits of losing. Credit Silsbee with everything they deserve. But just as well, discredit where it is due. Did anyone hear the announcer predicting the plays?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Silsbee92

Silsbee92

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

Maybe a better defense scheme and more pressure on QB, and the throw never gets there. We could what if all night.

Changes were made and we are seeing the benefits of losing. Credit Silsbee with everything they deserve. But just as well, discredit where it is due. Did anyone hear the announcer predicting the plays?

Man I get no credit!!  Maybe I actually know what play would be needed in those situations?

Been watching these two teams go at it for a LONG time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Silsbee92

Silsbee92

Posted
Posted
Just now, WOSdrummer99 said:

What were the final passing numbers?

rough number.... 400+

Brisbane was dropping dimes tonight.  Even we were taken aback by the accuracy he was delivering.  

Miller was devastating on two levels.... his athleticism was on display obviously, but the ball was put in places where

he was able to not stop his routes.  Crazy.

I cant even begin on the three passes to Cartwright.... back shoulder passes that only the receiver could grab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LCMAlumtiger32

LCMAlumtiger32

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

Maybe a better defense scheme and more pressure on QB, and the throw never gets there. We could what if all night.

Changes were made and we are seeing the benefits of losing. Credit Silsbee with everything they deserve. But just as well, discredit where it is due. Did anyone hear the announcer predicting the plays?

WOS did not blitz a whole lot. Silsbee did. Both teams offensive play calling is predictable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Silsbee92

Silsbee92

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LCMAlumtiger32 said:

WOS did not blitz a whole lot. Silsbee did. Both teams offensive play calling is predictable. 

Not true.... WOS blitzed.  Quite often.  Watch the film.  

Just paid for it on a couple plays.  Silsbee pass blocking was excellent.

Doesnt matter if its predictable if you can execute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gasilla

Gasilla

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, Tiger90 said:

This game could have easily been worse if not for some stupid Tiger penalties.  No disrespect to the kids but this was the worst team I’ve ever witnessed from WOS.  Is this just a young team?  If it’s just youth I understand.  This is the first Wos-Silsbee game where I’ve never really felt threatened by their offense.  

8/8 return on both sides of the ball. Not young. 26 PPG. School record. That all ill say to avoid being "unsupportive".

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LCMAlumtiger32

LCMAlumtiger32

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Silsbee92 said:

Not true.... WOS blitzed.  Quite often.  Watch the film.  

Just paid for it on a couple plays.  Silsbee pass blocking was excellent.

Doesnt matter if its predictable if you can execute.

I didnt see the MLB walking up in the gaps like silsbee. They might have blitzed 5 yards back and i didnt pay attention to the corners and out side linebackers

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,900
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    adline
    Newest Member
    adline
    Joined


  • Posts

    • idk
      Liberty is Open

      By idk · Posted

      How do you know that Harrison is not a big opportunity? I don't really know him, but maybe just maybe he is what Liberty needs. I was just wondering what you know about Harrison that doesn't make him a big opportunity. 
    • Mr. Thornton Melon
      Liberty is Open

      By Mr. Thornton Melon · Posted

      This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • 5GallonBucket
      Vivek interview with Rubin

      By 5GallonBucket · Posted

      The last 2 or so minutes are so true
    • tvc184
      US Supreme Court case from southeast Texas

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Looking back at the exact wording, it seems like you are correct and it was the concrete barriers that were the ultimate problem. I mentioned it in my last comment, even if it was just the barriers, did Texas take his property? I think a case like US v. Causby might go a long way to proving his case. Causby had an egg farm and during World War II, the US government started flying four engine heavy bombers for the war effort, low over his farm at full power. The extremely loud noise killed a bunch of his chickens and caused many of the rest of them to quit laying eggs. Even though he legally still on the property, he sued, saying that the federal government had effectively “taken” the use of his property from him. The US Supreme Court sided with him, saying that for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment, the federal government had indeed taken away the use of his property. It wasn’t intentional but that didn’t matter. It seems like this case would fall somewhere along those lines.
    • tvc184
      US Supreme Court case from southeast Texas

      By tvc184 · Posted

      That might have added to it but it said that they intentionally raised the roadway to help it act as a dam. Even if it was the dividers and no intent, did the state “take” his property without compensation? I think that it is interesting that a local landowner fought his case all the way to the US Supreme Court and won in a unanimous decision. So while he has not won his case yet, he won the right to have his day in court and possibly heard by a jury.     

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...