That might have added to it but it said that they intentionally raised the roadway to help it act as a dam.
Even if it was the dividers and no intent, did the state “take” his property without compensation?
I think that it is interesting that a local landowner fought his case all the way to the US Supreme Court and won in a unanimous decision.
So while he has not won his case yet, he won the right to have his day in court and possibly heard by a jury.
Recommended Posts