Jump to content

St. Louis (21) @ Vidor (51) - FINAL


jdawg03

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Hagar said:

Thanks Big Buddy!

No problem buddy, I’m gonna say since nobody else is posting. SL scored a TD against the backups and the xp was good to make it 51-21 Vidor.

They kicked an onside kick but idk who recovered, I heard all this from the parking lot on the way out. I don’t see the Pirates losing this one, even they can’t blow this lead with less than 7 minutes remaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Boneyard Boys said:

Vidor will get their first win of the season and they showed some new blood out there tonight. Not sure if they moved guys up or moved guys around probably both but they looked better on both sides of the ball tonight and played without all the stupid mistakes. Good luck to the Pirates and the SLC Saints the rest of the season. ByB out. ✌️Sounded like SL scored a TD as I’m walking out of the stadium. 

They were rotating in other players, some of which were JV players. They also opened up the playbook a little more. I thought some of those JV players gave them a spark they been missing. Good to see the kids get a W. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Cherokee88 said:

51 points out of that offense tonight? Maybe this is a sign of things to come for the Pirates. 

I hope so but that team played soft coverage type defense in the first half, in the second half they started stacking the box and selling out to stop the run. Most teams we play know what’s coming but the thing that encouraged me tonight was the play of our defense. They played good coverage for the most part, applied pressure to the QB and got some turnovers. That helped our offense tremendously by keeping the other teams defense on the field but it goes hand in hand the offense was able to sustain drives, get first downs and keep our defense fresh. Mainly because they didn’t have a bunch of illegal procedure penalties or stupid turnovers. The offense looked crisp, ran plays with precision, took a little more time to get everyone set. An injection of new playmakers seemed to spark them, it’s not all on the QB Odom or FB Watson anymore they had some help tonight. We finally played complimentary football for the first time this season, I think it’s our recipe for success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Unwoke said:

Yes he is, so is 34 and 21 who also did some damage last night out of the backfield. Venable who is number 20 can fly, not big in size but plays Big. 

Fantastic.  I heard a lot about him (know his mother).  Understand he, and his teammates, put a lot of numbers on the scoreboard in the 9th grade.  I wondered when they might see Friday Night Lights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...