Jump to content

Port Arthur Police Locate Two Men Who Went Missing 14 Years Apart in Canal


bullets13

Recommended Posts

Pretty crazy stuff.  They were diving the canal looking for a man who went missing about ten days ago and found him, but also found a car with remains in it that matches the description of a car driven by a port neches man who went missing 14 years ago.  It kind of makes you wonder how many missing persons cases would be solved if police stations could devote a dive team to just search all of their water ways for some set amount of time until all likely places had been searched, although I’m sure it would be pretty expensive and time consuming.  There’s a YouTube channel called Adventures With Purpose that has a couple of divers who’ve solved 23 cold cases since 2019 by searching likely waterways in areas where people went missing, and a couple of those cases were solved coincidentally while looking for other people.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bullets13 said:

Pretty crazy stuff.  They were diving the canal looking for a man who went missing about ten days ago and found him, but also found a car with remains in it that matches the description of a car driven by a port neches man who went missing 14 years ago.  It kind of makes you wonder how many missing persons cases would be solved if police stations could devote a dive team to just search all of their water ways for some set amount of time until all likely places had been searched, although I’m sure it would be pretty expensive and time consuming.  There’s a YouTube channel called Adventures With Purpose that has a couple of divers who’ve solved 23 cold cases since 2019 by searching likely waterways in areas where people went missing, and a couple of those cases were solved coincidentally while looking for other people.  

About 15 years ago Texas Equusearch (I think) was searching the canal along Hwy 82 for a specific vehicle and I think they found others but not the one they were looking for. For some reason there was a lot of news  media out there but I don’t remember the case. I remember the search because I stopped there briefly to watch the show and ended up talking to the media (in what I thought was a casual conversation). Unfortunately they used me for a spokesman and quoted me in the newspaper after I answered a typically stupid media question with an intentionally stupid answer. That was a lesson learned. You are never off the record with the media. :) 

 I remember several other cases where vehicles were found immediately that were submerged because someone witnessed the accident (or intentional act like a person getting rid of a stolen vehicle or trying to collect insurance money) or came upon the scene at night and saw the lights/taillights glowing under water before the battery went out. Any of those would have been missing had it not been for witnesses. 

It would be safe to say that hundreds (if not thousands) of missing vehicles and people could be found nationwide if waterways were searched. 

How much resources are going to be spent and who is going to spend it?

Also, it would not take dive teams to do an extremely time consuming and labor intensive job. There is plenty of underwater drones with search capable sonar and cameras. I have seen one locally owned by a private company and it has been hired locally by agencies for specific tasks.  I think that I have photos of it on my phone. Again however, who is going to pay? I think a good unit might run into hundreds of thousands of dollars. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, tvc184 said:

About 15 years ago Texas Equusearch (I think) was searching the canal along Hwy 82 for a specific vehicle and I think they found others but not the one they were looking for. For some reason there was a lot of news  media out there but I don’t remember the case. I remember the search because I stopped there briefly to watch the show and ended up talking to the media (in what I thought was a casual conversation). Unfortunately they used me for a spokesman and quoted me in the newspaper after I answered a typically stupid media question with an intentionally stupid answer. That was a lesson learned. You are never off the record with the media. :) 

 I remember several other cases where vehicles were found immediately that were submerged because someone witnessed the accident (or intentional act like a person getting rid of a stolen vehicle or trying to collect insurance money) or came upon the scene at night and saw the lights/taillights glowing under water before the battery went out. Any of those would have been missing had it not been for witnesses. 

It would be safe to say that hundreds (if not thousands) of missing vehicles and people could be found nationwide if waterways were searched. 

How much resources are going to be spent and who is going to spend it?

Also, it would not take dive teams to do an extremely time consuming and labor intensive job. There is plenty of underwater drones with search capable sonar and cameras. I have seen one locally owned by a private company and it has been hired locally by agencies for specific tasks.  I think that I have photos of it on my phone. Again however, who is going to pay? I think a good unit might run into hundreds of thousands of dollars. 

Yup, definitely cost prohibitive.  That’s what’s cool about the YouTube channel I mentioned, because they’re funded by donations and the money they make from views.  That said, they are also working on tips, not just randomly searching.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

Yup, definitely cost prohibitive.  That’s what’s cool about the YouTube channel I mentioned, because they’re funded by donations and the money they make from views.  That said, they are also working on tips, not just randomly searching.  

The case I mentioned with all the media was from some kind of tip or clue. In this area alone there might be miles of waterways to search and it could turn up nothing.

 In the cases like in PA where the two cars were found with bodies, there will likely be no criminal charges so potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars (if not into millions)  would be spent to only “possibly” (assuming any results) buy some closure for a family. I am not minimizing that relief it would be.

 I wish there was a cost effective way to start systematically clearing areas. Maybe have a regional team like Jefferson, Hardin and Orange Counties with the many cities all putting in money and get some task force to start searching. It could be a location a day. I mean having a dedicated team trained in the technology and purchase of the equipment. Heck, there is probably grant money.

 The biggest problem would be finding someone to get the ball rolling with the research into the cost of the equipment, training, number of personnel needed, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,932
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...