Jump to content

President Trumps Mar-a-lago home is being raided by the FBI


Unwoke

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Do you think his lawyer's actions were acceptable?

Have charges been filed on the lawyer for wrong doing? If so what are those charges? Did the lawyer knowing do what Big Girl says they did? You’ve have totally missed the Big Picture of what’s been obliviously going on in this country the last 5 years. Sorry but  I can’t help lazy,sleepy,blind sheep. We’re to far pass that point,  live in the mud hole you’ve mentally made for yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Unwoke said:

Have charges been filed on the lawyer for wrong doing? If so what are those charges? Did the lawyer knowing do what Big Girl says they did? You’ve have totally missed the Big Picture of what’s been obliviously going on in this country the last 5 years. Sorry but  I can’t help lazy,sleepy,blind sheep. We’re to far pass that point,  live in the mud hole you’ve mentally made for yourself.

Why did the lawyer lie?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 45thAND46thSucks said:

So your freedom of speech is allowed, yet mine isn't? Should've known

Big Girl agreeing with you and thinking what you said is comical tells me all I need to know.

That’s what you gleaned from my post? Amazing.

Thought you didn’t care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Big girl said:

Why did the lawyer lie?

New Breaking News Big Girl!

UPDATE: It has been revealed that Donald Trump was housing a private server @ Mar-a-Lago & hired a close associate to wipe it clean with computer software.The FBI also found gov’t phones which were smashed to prevent evidence from being discovered.
 

Just Kidding! 

That was Hillary Clinton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Can someone please answer my question. Why did the lawyer lie? Or did Trump deceive him into believing that he turned in all of the documents in June?

I'll make a deal with you:  When you start answering our questions we'll star answering yours!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Unwoke said:

New Breaking News Big Girl!

UPDATE: It has been revealed that Donald Trump was housing a private server @ Mar-a-Lago & hired a close associate to wipe it clean with computer software.The FBI also found gov’t phones which were smashed to prevent evidence from being discovered.
 

Just Kidding! 

That was Hillary Clinton.

Oh-oh big girl will not like that.  She probably doesn’t believe it anyway.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Can someone please answer my question. Why did the lawyer lie? Or did Trump deceive him into believing that he turned in all of the documents in June?

No one is answering because your asking a question that is not provable without a investigation that the lawyer knowingly lied. You know? Innocent till proven guilty. Just because a news article says someone lied doesn’t make it so. 
 

On another note where are the affidavits to even get a warrant? You have to have probable cause to raid a Presidents Home which has never been done in American history. 
 
I am hearing that the Affidavit was Hearsay, you know 2nd hand information. Which is not solid grounds to do what the FBI did.

 

 

I know…I know, No One is Above The Law…Vomit 

I'm telling you, President Trump will not be convicted and will not be jailed. This is all nonsense. You can ask all the dumb questions you want but it’s not going to change a thing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Again, nuclear secrets cannot be declassified.

Again you don’t know what’s been declassified or what hasn’t not been declassified, an what’s even in the documents period, so quit acting so stupidly all knowing. Why don’t you let the legal process play out Ms. CNN.

Again I ask you what was the probable cause in the affidavits to cause them to raid his home? Are the individuals or individual credible that filed the affidavit. Was the affidavit filed off of hearsay? Can you answer that question since you think your some Constitutional Law Professor who has the inside scoop?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,899
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    gosikij
    Newest Member
    gosikij
    Joined



  • Posts

    • How do you know that Harrison is not a big opportunity? I don't really know him, but maybe just maybe he is what Liberty needs. I was just wondering what you know about Harrison that doesn't make him a big opportunity. 
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • The last 2 or so minutes are so true
    • Looking back at the exact wording, it seems like you are correct and it was the concrete barriers that were the ultimate problem. I mentioned it in my last comment, even if it was just the barriers, did Texas take his property? I think a case like US v. Causby might go a long way to proving his case. Causby had an egg farm and during World War II, the US government started flying four engine heavy bombers for the war effort, low over his farm at full power. The extremely loud noise killed a bunch of his chickens and caused many of the rest of them to quit laying eggs. Even though he legally still on the property, he sued, saying that the federal government had effectively “taken” the use of his property from him. The US Supreme Court sided with him, saying that for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment, the federal government had indeed taken away the use of his property. It wasn’t intentional but that didn’t matter. It seems like this case would fall somewhere along those lines.
    • That might have added to it but it said that they intentionally raised the roadway to help it act as a dam. Even if it was the dividers and no intent, did the state “take” his property without compensation? I think that it is interesting that a local landowner fought his case all the way to the US Supreme Court and won in a unanimous decision. So while he has not won his case yet, he won the right to have his day in court and possibly heard by a jury.     
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...