Jump to content

2022 Nederland Bulldogs


dme1111

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

The first qb, tall (sophomore?) had a huge arm and could sling it. His passes at times were way off mark but it might have been the wrong pattern and/or timing. A receiver  breaks left and he throws right. I thought the line looked okay but they seriously looked like they needed someone to want to carry the ball.

In though the second qb that came in (I think) with the first team during game like conditions, did a better job of moving the team. Was it better qb play or was the team coming together better nest the end? I might have been to shell shocked to notice and I am being serious. I think when noticing such glaring mistakes (which were plenty)  it is easy to overlook the good parts.

HF seemed very inspired and were getting after it.

I know it is a scrimmage but next week might get ugly if some serious improvement isn’t made. Maybe last night was like throwing a cold bucket of water on someone, shockingly waking them up. 

Agree with most of your assessment,  there were lots of players in/out in the skilled positions, OLine and defense.  You can tell they are searching for the right grouping, but they better spend all week in a catching and tackling clinic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, spidersal said:

Yes very long. May not win a game

Time to clean house and bring in a quality coaching staff 

I didn’t hear your whiny butt complaining about the staff a couple years ago when they went 3 rounds deep.  
 

same staff as now...different players.  They are young & there will be growing pains.  Some persevere...others, like you, complain.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Preach BayouB... I made the same point last week...this same staff dramatically OVER achieved just season before last...agree, same staff, different players...they are young and need to adjust to Friday night speed and these guys will improve as the season progresses...what that looks like, who knows, but I think it bodes well for the next couple of years

I'm just glad I will never have to be in a foxhole with spidersal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be one of the 1st to say yea and congratulate the Bulldogs if they do well

You can call it complaining, whining whatever you want to, however I call it a pretty accurate assessment 

I said when 4 teams make it to the playoffs, the Dogs should make it every year

I said the talent pool must be down and I think the 1st scrimmage shows that

I said the head coaches record is not that impressive and I certainly don’t think it is

I agreed that they have made the playoffs which is super, however if you look at their final playoff game each of those years , it was not a pretty site

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, spidersal said:

I will be one of the 1st to say yea and congratulate the Bulldogs if they do well

You can call it complaining, whining whatever you want to, however I call it a pretty accurate assessment 

I said when 4 teams make it to the playoffs, the Dogs should make it every year

I said the talent pool must be down and I think the 1st scrimmage shows that

I said the head coaches record is not that impressive and I certainly don’t think it is

I agreed that they have made the playoffs which is super, however if you look at their final playoff game each of those years , it was not a pretty site

Good point, I don’t remember hearing much from you when this coaching staff squeezed blood from a turnip.  We won’t hear from you in as year or so, but have fun pal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been watching the Bulldogs, from afar, for many, many years.  Based on the Forum comments and the results of this scrimmage, this may be the worst Bulldog team in a long, long time.  But, it’s still early.  Hopefully the Coaches can turn it around.  Hate to see a historically good program go down the tubes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, spidersal said:

Well I know the talent pool must be down, however Nederland should make the playoffs every year with 4 teams going to the playoffs. PNG doesn’t seem to have a problem with that

For the 90+ percent of folks on the Barrow bandwagon , if you look at his record as head coach it is not very impressive Yes they have made the playoffs and again should every year. You will also notice that when they were defeated in the playoffs it was a total tail kicking.  So, as you can imagine I don’t think the coaching is very good 

Look for the Dogs and Santa Fe to battle it out to see who will be 0-10 this season after watching the scrimmage vs HF

I'm with you..  Coaching is not good.  My biggest issue which I've mentioned before is the coaching staffs lack of ability to keep players in the program.  You have multiple seniors who were starters their junior year just quitting their senior year.  Something is rotten...  I'm tired of the good ole boy system in big Ned.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dme1111 said:

I'm with you..  Coaching is not good.  My biggest issue which I've mentioned before is the coaching staffs lack of ability to keep players in the program.  You have multiple seniors who were starters their junior year just quitting their senior year.  Something is rotten...  I'm tired of the good ole boy system in big Ned.  

The good ole boy system has been at Big Ned for 60 years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, outanup said:

The Dogs are young, just read that 6 sophomores are starting on Defense.....New qb, and plenty of holes to fill. I'm in the camp that believes Monte and company squeeze every drop outta what they have to work with.....If anyone here believes we need a change let em drag and address the School board. 

They are young because the core walked.  Nothing would make me happier than seeing them succeed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Young team with no experience at QB opening the season at WOS is tough, then going to P.A. home vs. Silsbee then @ Willowridge. Dogs could be 0-4 going into the Dayton game. Hopefully one of the QB's steps up & coaches find some of that old uncle Larry winning magic to pull out some early season upsets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,900
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    adline
    Newest Member
    adline
    Joined



  • Posts

    • How do you know that Harrison is not a big opportunity? I don't really know him, but maybe just maybe he is what Liberty needs. I was just wondering what you know about Harrison that doesn't make him a big opportunity. 
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • The last 2 or so minutes are so true
    • Looking back at the exact wording, it seems like you are correct and it was the concrete barriers that were the ultimate problem. I mentioned it in my last comment, even if it was just the barriers, did Texas take his property? I think a case like US v. Causby might go a long way to proving his case. Causby had an egg farm and during World War II, the US government started flying four engine heavy bombers for the war effort, low over his farm at full power. The extremely loud noise killed a bunch of his chickens and caused many of the rest of them to quit laying eggs. Even though he legally still on the property, he sued, saying that the federal government had effectively “taken” the use of his property from him. The US Supreme Court sided with him, saying that for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment, the federal government had indeed taken away the use of his property. It wasn’t intentional but that didn’t matter. It seems like this case would fall somewhere along those lines.
    • That might have added to it but it said that they intentionally raised the roadway to help it act as a dam. Even if it was the dividers and no intent, did the state “take” his property without compensation? I think that it is interesting that a local landowner fought his case all the way to the US Supreme Court and won in a unanimous decision. So while he has not won his case yet, he won the right to have his day in court and possibly heard by a jury.     
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...