Jump to content

4A DI Top 25


Recommended Posts

On 6/27/2022 at 4:57 AM, purpleeagle said:

Not downgrading Vidor, just thought they should have been in the top 20.

Other than the 3 point loss to LBJ in SC game, Vidor played CH the closest in playoffs, only losing by 5.  That’s after the Pirates were down to 3rd string RB.  Just numbers, but still, I agree. Pirates should’ve definitely been in top 25.  Still, something to be said about the element of surprise.  Sure will miss that man/child at NG.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/26/2022 at 5:18 PM, Mr. Thornton Melon said:

Seriously, Vidor probably beats lumberton and lcm regardless of rank. It doesnt matter how high they are ranked because they arent getting past anyone in that top 10 list

Between Peavy hand laying the new turf and Bridge City and WOS athletes flocking to play for the him, no chance anyone in this district touches LCM.  State championship coming soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/28/2022 at 2:12 PM, Hagar said:

Other than the 3 point loss to LBJ in SC game, Vidor played CH the closest in playoffs, only losing by 5.  That’s after the Pirates were down to 3rd string RB.  Just numbers, but still, I agree. Pirates should’ve definitely been in top 25.  Still, something to be said about the element of surprise.  Sure will miss that man/child at NG.  

being somebody has always gotta nick pick things these days (lol).

My friend CH played LBJ in semi-finals.

LBJ then played Stephenville in SC game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dirty_but_Dazzling said:

being somebody has always gotta nick pick things these days (lol).

My friend CH played LBJ in semi-finals.

LBJ then played Stephenville in SC game.

Lol, thanks for the correction.  Still, indicates the Pirates were capable of being one of the top teams, especially if not for the big IF - the devastating RB injuries.  For the shotgun offenses, a minor setback, but for the Slot T, BAM.  Anyway, water under the bridge.  A tad less than two months away from a new year and new teams.  You can almost feel the excitement and anticipation.  And come Friday, August 26, the Pirates will get to break in the new turf field in Silsbee.  I think it’s a great matchup, and if anything like last years game, going to be a barn burner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LCMs biggest loss was Ashton Landry at qb. He left big shoes to fill. There are several guys returning on both sides of the ball, but i'm curious to see how we look at the qb position. As far as our district, Vidor will be tough as always (we have struggled the past several years slowing down that slot t!)...Lumberton should be tough, and as always Huffman will be competing for the top spot.  Havent heard much on Splendora or Livingston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, BattlinBear02 said:

LCMs biggest loss was Ashton Landry at qb. He left big shoes to fill. There are several guys returning on both sides of the ball, but i'm curious to see how we look at the qb position. As far as our district, Vidor will be tough as always (we have struggled the past several years slowing down that slot t!)...Lumberton should be tough, and as always Huffman will be competing for the top spot.  Havent heard much on Splendora or Livingston.

No doubt, Landry is what made defending that offense difficult. Kid could run but was accurate in his passing. Did he get any offers to play college ball? Great ball player!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PirateNole984 said:

I look for Vidor to have a good season.  Excited about the QB!

Wonder if he’ll pull a Quirante and start both ways?  Doing QB & MLB with a Slot T offense takes a special kind of kid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Hagar said:

Wonder if he’ll pull a Quirante and start both ways?  Doing QB & MLB with a Slot T offense takes a special kind of kid.

What I am hearing is I believe they have 2 other QB’s that will get some touches also. I know one for sure can fly and is tough to bring down one on one because of his shiftyness. The kid also has a pretty decent arm for the few pass plays Vidor runs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,937
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • There is a difference, but I wouldn't at all put it past Trump to do so if he had the infrastructure in place to get away with it like the Dems currently do.  With the amount of effort he's invested in ruining those republicans who've opposed him, it wouldn't surprise me one bit.
    • I think it will be an interesting case and could potentially come up for appeal on a different constitutional point.  The Supreme Court has ruled in the past that the government doesn’t have to take possession of property in order to take it under the meaning of the Fifth Amendment.  If they take away the enjoyment or use of the property, it is no different than physically seizing it to build a highway for example. In a lawsuit as opposed to a criminal trial, a person/plaintiff doesn’t have to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt but rather by a preponderance of evidence or “more likely” to have happened. Maybe it could be described as more likely yes than no or 51%-49%.  ”IF” it can be shown at a trial by a preponderance of evidence that Texas more likely yes than no caused the flooding with its engineering of the project, the people suing might have a case. But…. Does that alone win the case under the Fifth Amendment taking clause? I am not so sure. In US v Causby the Supreme Court ruled that the US government took a man’s property by flying airplanes over it. It was a public airport lawfully leased by the US in WWII and used to fly heavy bombers from it. Causby had an egg farm and the extremely loud noise of some airplanes under full power and sometimes at night with a landing lights being so close, it bothered and scared the family and damaged his egg farm production. Some chickens died and some quit laying eggs due to the extreme disturbances and lights at night. The Supreme Court ruled in Causby’s favor saying that the US had taken away the enjoyment and use of his land even though they didn’t physically seize it. The use of the land was hampered and that was enough for the taking clause under the Fifth Amendment. So in the IH-10 case, did Texas take away the use or enjoyment of the property?  A point of Causby was that the military bombers at a public airport was certainly for “public use”. The planes were public/taxpayers’ and the airport and lease were taxpayers’ property so the “public” definitely used it   My question in this lawsuit against Texas, even in they can prove the damage, was the damage (like in Causby) for “public use”? If not would it then not be a Fifth Amendment case but rather a state law case?  If Texas law denies such a lawsuit under state sovereignty and the families can’t prove a Fifth Amendment case of “public use”, could they prove the damages but still lose the case under state law? I haven’t read that anywhere and just thinking out loud. I could be way off base. But I think it could be interesting…..
    • Both sides...that is, everyone tries to get their people elected. Trump has not weaponized the government to bankrupt and imprison his political opponents. Night and day difference for me.
    • Surely you're aware of the great lengths Trump has gone to disrupt the elections and destroy the careers of republican politicians who haven't supported some of his most outlandish claims, or dared to question him or disagree with him about January 6.  You and I actually agree on this issue, although it must only go one way for you, because Trump's actions against republicans who didn't fall into lockstep with him is one of my biggest concerns about reelecting him.  The fact that he took action to affect literally hundreds of republican primaries from national elections down to municipal levels across the country, is concerning. It would've been one thing had he done it in an effort to help republicans win. Instead his purpose was to push out his perceived detractors and install MAGA politicians at every level of government in as many places as possible, and has resulted in a fractured republican party.
    • Lmao. No doubt. With a name like that, he would've gotten made fun of even if he was home-schooled.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...