Jump to content

DCTF 4A D2


WO-S 89

Recommended Posts

DII                  

1. Carthage     11-1     9/3

2. Gilmer         14-2    4/7

3.Witchita Falls Hirschi    12-3   8/4

4. WOS            11-2     7/8

5. Tex. Pleasant Grove    8-6    8/5

6. Cuero           13-2     5/8

7. Wimberley     10-3     6/2

8. Glen Rose      10-2     10/7

9. Silsbee          5-5      8/8

10. Geronimo Navarro      10-3     5/7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DII

11. Aubrey           12-2       3/7

12. Bellville          12-1        7/5

13. Sinton             11-2       4/6

14. Van                  12-1       4/6

15. Lago Vista      10-4       5/8

16. Salado             7-4        5/6

17. Jasper              6-5        7/4

18. Devine             8-3        6/8

19. Sunnyvale        6-6       6/6

20. Ingleside          9-3        7/6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Dirty_but_Dazzling said:

DII

11. Aubrey           12-2       3/7

12. Bellville          12-1        7/5

13. Sinton             11-2       4/6

14. Van                  12-1       4/6

15. Lago Vista      10-4       5/8

16. Salado             7-4        5/6

17. Jasper              6-5        7/4

18. Devine             8-3        6/8

19. Sunnyvale        6-6       6/6

20. Ingleside          9-3        7/6

Pretty high for us to…. Losing Briggs and Reece is gonna hurt… We do have a couple good sophomore’s ready to step up, but Bellville will be back to more of a traditional ground and pound and defensive strategy to win ballgames. I will say we will be big on the O line and D line this year which is a plus.  Sophomore DL DJ Sanders got a Baylor offer earlier this summer and I have a feeling it won’t be the last.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, aTmfan06 said:

Pretty high for us to…. Losing Briggs and Reece is gonna hurt… We do have a couple good sophomore’s ready to step up, but Bellville will be back to more of a traditional ground and pound and defensive strategy to win ballgames. I will say we will be big on the O line and D line this year which is a plus.  Sophomore DL DJ Sanders got a Baylor offer earlier this summer and I have a feeling it won’t be the last.

Not just to be a hater, but how does a team that lost in the first round last year to a team that lost in the second round find themselves ranked at #9? 

Just predictions more than rankings, I guess. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Not just to be a hater, but how does a team that lost in the first round last year to a team that lost in the second round find themselves ranked at #9? 

Just predictions more than rankings, I guess. 

 

It has to do with "this year" not being "last year". Teams do not always perform the same from year to year. There have been scenarios where a team "won a State Championship one year" and then "did not win a State Championship the next year". In extreme case, teams that "did not make the playoffs one year" actually "made the playoffs the next year".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 89Falcon said:

It has to do with "this year" not being "last year". Teams do not always perform the same from year to year. There have been scenarios where a team "won a State Championship one year" and then "did not win a State Championship the next year".  

Of course... but it's kinda junky to say "here are our rankings, based on zero evidence/performance.... it's a guess, honestly."  I can even understand teams ending up with a higher ranking than they deserve for this year based on performances last year by kids who have graduated.  But at least there's a little bit of credibility there, even if it's only by inference or association.  But to say, "yeah, the last time we saw this team they were literally getting shelled by a kinda crappy team that lost the next week.  But that makes them a nine in my book" means the rankings are just a popularity contest and mean nothing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

Not just to be a hater, but how does a team that lost in the first round last year to a team that lost in the second round find themselves ranked at #9? 

Just predictions more than rankings, I guess. 

 

My post was about Bellville. I’m assuming your talking about Silsbee though lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

That rivalry game between Silsbee and Bridge City oughta be a fun one eh?? 😁

I didn't say that, lol.  

I felt kinda the same way when we were ranked fairly high at the start of the 2017 season... it was based on our 2016 record and a bunch those kids were gone.  It felt like our ranking was too high, but it was understandable because it was at least based on a record.  Silsbee's 2022 ranking is just puzzling. I mean, imagine if for some unknown reason Texas Tech was ranked in the NCAA top ten this preseason. 

 

Huh?  Based on what? A good receiver prospect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, aTmfan06 said:

My post was about Bellville. I’m assuming your talking about Silsbee though lol

Yes... that's the intended recipient of all of the shade I'm throwing.  They could very well turn out to be a top ten team, who knows?  I just don't see a reason to rank them so highly now.  There were literally 63 other teams with playoffs equally 

I think WOS's ranking might be higher than they will actually end up placing based on the changes in the program, but at least they earned theirs, so to speak. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,932
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a dirtbag (your descriptor) does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...Dirtbags. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comment were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...