Jump to content

Addition of shot clock on UIL meeting agenda again


Recommended Posts

Something else that caught my eye:

 

G. New Business

1. Written Proposals from the Public

a. A proposal to prohibit freshmen athletes from participating in varsity competitions

 

I know that these are just proposals but still on the agenda to be discussed next week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bobcatfan4life said:

Something else that caught my eye:

 

G. New Business

1. Written Proposals from the Public

a. A proposal to prohibit freshmen athletes from participating in varsity competitions

 

I know that these are just proposals but still on the agenda to be discussed next week

This should be no business of the UIL to decide imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/8/2022 at 12:23 PM, Bobcatfan4life said:

Something else that caught my eye:

 

G. New Business

1. Written Proposals from the Public

a. A proposal to prohibit freshmen athletes from participating in varsity competitions

 

I know that these are just proposals but still on the agenda to be discussed next week

Why? I’m not sure I understand the problem with a freshman playing varsity sports. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prohibiting freshmen athletes from varsity participation would absolutely hurt small schools. That proposal makes no sense and it's not the 1st time I've seen it on the docket. Seems to me like someone got beat out by a freshman in the past that was better than them and they're bitter about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 86hawk said:

what caught my eye was the proposal to allow 6th grade at the 1A level??  Am i correct to assume they already allow 7th and 8th grade to participate?  If am misinterpreting this, please let me know.

It's for Middle Schools in 1A ISDs, allowing the 6th graders to now play with the 7th and 8th graders. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amendment approved:

The Legislative Council approved an amendment to the reclassification and realignment policy as it relates to the conference placement of UIL member charter schools. The language will allow UIL staff the option to place charter schools as much as one conference above the conference for which their enrollment qualifies

 

In short, UIL now has the option to force charter schools like Faith Family to play at least one classification up from their enrollment size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Amendment approved:

The Legislative Council approved an amendment to the reclassification and realignment policy as it relates to the conference placement of UIL member charter schools. The language will allow UIL staff the option to place charter schools as much as one conference above the conference for which their enrollment qualifies

 

In short, UIL now has the option to force charter schools like Faith Family to play at least one classification up from their enrollment size.

I hope they do something with it.  Having the ability to do it and actually following through are two different things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cherokee88 said:

If schools were going to get help funding the shot clock system, and somebody could work it correctly I think it would help the overall hs game. 

I agree.  That’s the biggest if though.  I love the shot clock.  But it is imperative you have someone competent to operate it.  If not, the whole game is spent with Refs (who let’s face it, are generally not ready for prime time to begin with) consumed with resetting the shot clock to such and such time.  As a result, the device intended to speed up games, actually brings them to a grinding halt. 

I say all that as one of the scoreboard operators of all time.  I am dreadful at it.  Shot clock is a way more tasking job.  You almost need a 4th referee to do it.  

My thought would be to implement it for 6A and 5A, if you are going to do it.  But the other part of me, even though I hate watching teams hold the ball, knows that Milan, Indiana never happens with a shot clock.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/14/2022 at 6:44 PM, bullets13 said:

I know you guys are against the shot clock, but I’m all for it.  Even if it was something like a minute, just to force SOME action to prevent total stall ball.  That would still be more than enough time for your fundamentally slow offenses to eat clock and get a shot off.

I’m on the fence.. simply because “slow playing” is often used as a means of strategy for high school teams that lack offensive abilities. I do believe a shot clock would help the game in many situations but make not so good basketball teams lose games by even more embarrassing numbers.

Teams that have good teams and/or good players don’t hold the possession for longer than a shot clock period anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, oldschool2 said:

I’m on the fence.. simply because “slow playing” is often used as a means of strategy for high school teams that lack offensive abilities. I do believe a shot clock would help the game in many situations but make not so good basketball teams lose games by even more embarrassing numbers.

Teams that have good teams and/or good players don’t hold the possession for longer than a shot clock period anyway.

That’s why I say make it a minute.  Teams can still slow it waaaay down, but you won’t see teams holding for the last shot with 3 minutes left in the half, or stuff like the campfire formation that lumberton tried this past season. Also, if it’s an even minute refs can monitor it pretty easily.  Maybe start motioning down from ten seconds like they do in the back court to warn the players.  It wouldn’t be perfect, but if a team held the ball a full 60 seconds I wouldn’t really care if they got screwed on a bad shot clock call once in awhile.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,926
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined


  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...