Jump to content

Silsbee vs WOS - Regional Finals


STigerNation

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, JimThorpe said:

Clearly this would be a huge win for Silsbee, arguably the biggest ever.  But what about WOS? 

Obviously it couldn't be the biggest, not for a 4 time State Championship School.  But how big is it? 

To me the 86 and 87 wins were the biggest because they came against the very best in Div 4A.  2015 and 2016 were huge of course, especially when combined with the 4 straight appearances.   But WOS didn't beat the BEST 4A teams on the way to the championships.  I think both Carthage and La Vega would beaten the Mustangs in those years.  And probably Argyle in 2015.  From what I've seen so far this year in watching Silsbee's run, Div II isn't quite as tough as Div I, which stands to reason.  But that's neither here nor there.  The bottom line is that the WOS program is arguably the strongest in the state for the last 40 years all things considered.

And where does that put us?  Well, the WOS faithful can (and do) say, "We beat you guys practically every time we meet in the regular season and preseason."

But Tiger folks can rebut, "So what?  We get beat regularly by a certain 3A team (that shall remain nameless).  Big deal,  none of that ever keeps us from making the playoffs.  And you guys have never sent us home in the post season.  We, on the other hand, HAVE sent you home. And that more than trumps all those less important games."

So, can a win on Friday be just another Forest Gump type moment for the Mustangs?  "So we went to the playoffs... again.  And we won our quarterfinal game.... again."

I wonder.

 

Not "beating the best" 4A teams, is very subjective. Also, the UIL decided the new classifications, not WOS. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kicker 2.0 said:

Actually, we were a team full of Sophomores and Juniors.... If we would have beat Waller, we would have played LaMarque the following week. We were seriously overachieving making it that far to be honest. 

Nah Kicker we had another game vs Friendswood in the 3rd Rd before LaMarque  our sophomore yr in 96. We overlooked Silsbee our senior year because when we played them earlier in the season & limited them to -17 total yards and one first down. That still has to some kind of record . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, JimThorpe said:

And you guys have never sent us home in the post season.  We, on the other hand, HAVE sent you home. And that more than trumps all those less important games."

So, can a win on Friday be just another Forest Gump type moment for the Mustangs?  "So we went to the playoffs... again.  And we won our quarterfinal game.... again."

I wonder.

 

This is what makes it not just another quarterfinal game...oh,and it's Silsbee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

Since the split to multiple divisions the playoffs are watered down. 10 yrs ago going this deep was as far it got. With all American and future hall of fame players.

I disagree.Puts schools playing teams with closer enrollments and that is not watering down...that's just being fair.Just MO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, kicker 2.0 said:

Not "beating the best" 4A teams, is very subjective. Also, the UIL decided the new classifications, not WOS. lol

Bring back the one division win or lose it's TRUE  closure.I have no problem with that. I remember when wos lost to the tigers in the playoffs. They made it all they way to la marque which skull drugg silsbee 49 to 28 or something like that. I did see them play el campo the game before that in the Astrodome (the greatest stadium in the world) they ran all over the ricebrids that day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, bzy said:

Nah Kicker we had another game vs Friendswood in the 3rd Rd before LaMarque  our sophomore yr in 96. We overlooked Silsbee our senior year because when we played them earlier in the season & limited them to -17 total yards and one first down. That still has to some kind of record . . .

Thats right! That season we would have matched with LaMarque in the 4th round, not the 3rd like our next season. Yeah, we destroyed the Tigers in pre district in '98.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All this talk of previous wins against us or our playoff win vs you mean virtually nothing.  The only thing that it gives is the “they can’t beat us” or “we can’t get past them” mystique.  You can even throw out that game a few weeks ago.  These are both 2 different teams now.  I have questions still in my head for both sides not only pertaining to this game but anymore that the winner will play.  Naturally I want to see my Tigers win but I really want a good clean game with no injuries so that the winner will be in good shape for the next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, MrUmp1 said:

 Of all collisions that occur in the United States, approximately 52% occur within a 5-mile radius of home while an astounding 69% occur within 10 miles. Another survey by Progressive Insurance corroborates these numbers.

Look what I seen on the news today. 

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, ATTITUDE IS EVERYTHING said:

Bring back the one division win or lose it's TRUE  closure.I have no problem with that. I remember when wos lost to the tigers in the playoffs. They made it all they way to la marque which skull drugg silsbee 49 to 28 or something like that. I did see them play el campo the game before that in the Astrodome (the greatest stadium in the world) they ran all over the ricebrids that day.

Not even close on the Silsbee/La Marque score. Silsbee was going for a field goal late in the game for the lead but La Marque blocked it and ran it back for the game deciding TD. Final score was 21-12. Far from that skull dragging you mentioned. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

Your point? This could happen between Beaumont and Silsbee, or between orange and Beaumont as well. 

That’s true. But if you had a child on board it’s alot faster to drive to Bmt then a hour a away to check on them. Because I’m sure most family’s don’t follow the bus. Closer you are it’s faster to respond to your child is my point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, GoFundMe said:

The game is in southeast Texas.  New Caney is about as southeast Texas as it gets.

I'm referring to SETX, as in like the vacinity of where I live. Ignorant, yes. If looking at a map, I could identify where SETX would be considered. But for this discussion, SETX is like uhh Kirbyville, to PA, to East Chambers, to the Kountze area. Moving clockwise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, STiger85 said:

Not even close on the Silsbee/La Marque score. Silsbee was going for a field goal late in the game for the lead but La Marque blocked it and ran it back for the game deciding TD. Final score was 21-12. Far from that skull dragging you mentioned. 

Good catch apologizes yall put 28 on el campo I stand corrected. Stephenville put it on la marque that year. I told the people from el campo that silsbee was going to win I was living Wharton at the time 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

I get it. I would go to the game if it was here in SETX. But, I don't want to drive that far. Plus, I would have to scrounge up some gas money.

That's why the two coaches agreed to play in Porter. All they want is Silsbee and WO-S fans there. It's those "extra" fans that attend to just cause trouble when it's convenient for them to attend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...