Jump to content

All the hype about PNG and PAM


thumper72

Recommended Posts

Both team having very good offenses and no defense .    The offenses carries both teams as did it carry Crosby.   72 to 68.  Not very balanced.  I for one am very impressed with their fan base.  It is awesome .    Although, perhaps a bit of work on defense, would make the teams a lot better , and then the fans could really have something to brag about.  It is not the youth that is lacking it is the coaching staff.  The players do what they are told.  And the fans go along with it because they are winning,  kind of half a lesson at school.  Now watch what happens,  there will be a generous amount of trash talk about this post instead of correcting the issue.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, thumper72 said:

Both team having very good offenses and no defense .    The offenses carries both teams as did it carry Crosby.   72 to 68.  Not very balanced.  I for one am very impressed with their fan base.  It is awesome .    Although, perhaps a bit of work on defense, would make the teams a lot better , and then the fans could really have something to brag about.  It is not the youth that is lacking it is the coaching staff.  The players do what they are told.  And the fans go along with it because they are winning,  kind of half a lesson at school.  Now watch what happens,  there will be a generous amount of trash talk about this post instead of correcting the issue.   

PAM offense if better than their defense? Now that’s funny!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That pos

23 minutes ago, thumper72 said:

Both team having very good offenses and no defense .    The offenses carries both teams as did it carry Crosby.   72 to 68.  Not very balanced.  I for one am very impressed with their fan base.  It is awesome .    Although, perhaps a bit of work on defense, would make the teams a lot better , and then the fans could really have something to brag about.  It is not the youth that is lacking it is the coaching staff.  The players do what they are told.  And the fans go along with it because they are winning,  kind of half a lesson at school.  Now watch what happens,  there will be a generous amount of trash talk about this post instead of correcting the issue.   

PAM  front 7 is among the vbest in the state. Their back end is ok.

Png might as well play the dads of the kids on D if we gonna get burnt so often lol 

Your post really only applies to png. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, thumper72 said:

Both team having very good offenses and no defense .    The offenses carries both teams as did it carry Crosby.   72 to 68.  Not very balanced.  I for one am very impressed with their fan base.  It is awesome .    Although, perhaps a bit of work on defense, would make the teams a lot better , and then the fans could really have something to brag about.  It is not the youth that is lacking it is the coaching staff.  The players do what they are told.  And the fans go along with it because they are winning,  kind of half a lesson at school.  Now watch what happens,  there will be a generous amount of trash talk about this post instead of correcting the issue.   

Just so you know its always questionable when someone brand new pops on here with this kind of post. So just for my own personal curiosity were do you hail from? Which team do you support? You know the sort of thing you learn from someone on their first post ever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gosh, PN-G district champs two years  in a row. I thought the object of the game was to  win. Seems like PAM and PN-G are doing just that. Leave the coaches alone, I am sure they are just as interesting in getting their defenses better. If they had better players to put on defense then they would be in their playing.

All you negatives, Coaches you are not.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, purpleeagle said:

Gosh, PN-G district champs two years  in a row. I thought the object of the game was to  win. Seems like PAM and PN-G are doing just that. Leave the coaches alone, I am sure they are just as interesting in getting their defenses better. If they had better players to put on defense then they would be in their playing.

All you negatives, Coaches you are not.... 

I think taterchip has already completely made his/her point clear. They have specifically targeted two teams right off the bat while refusing to name a supported team. So either him/her is a hater of one or both of those said teams or really is undercover from one of those said teams and is just throwing their team in the mix to draw attention away from themselves. Could be a PAM fan. Could be a fan of another account whom just does not want to say what is really on his/her mind. Or finally, it could be a PN-G fan with an ax to grind about little junior sitting on the bench for whatever reason. Anyway, you dice it Welcome to the board I look forward to some more of you insightful genius style banter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, prepballfan said:

That could be part of the game see they want you to think said person is not from there so play stupid and bring up some incredibly far off fact that’s not even close to true

I don't think a Pam would play the long con and post about east chambers for weeks just to throw the scent off him them being a Pam fan. If so that's crazy and he needs something better to do with his life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • Diboll - 1  Central Heights- 0
    • Just to expound a little further, so you are not confused...I, along with so many others, are laughing at your desperation. You are working overtime, nay, double even triple time, trying to convince normal people Trump was bad for the country. His policies provided for peace all over the world, low gas prices, low food prices, energy independence, closed border, low inflation, record low unemployment, and on and on and on. You try to counter this narrative by saying unemployment skyrocketed on his watch. You said this knowing full well the unemployment rate went up due to Covid. Your narrative is just so laughable, to the point of side-splitting hilarity. Who would even attempt this asinine narrative? Now, even if you get past the utter stupidity of that MSNBC talking point, you provide another side-splitting hilarious tidbit of evidence to back your claim of Trump being bad for the country. You actually tried to tie the stock market going down to Trump...after Covid. You, I, and everybody else knows the stock market was flourishing under Trump...until Covid hit. This argument is just as bad as the other one. Again, who would even attempt this narrative? The only thing you could remotely muster that had any sliver of truthfulness, is that spending increased. Sure, Trump rebuilt the military and gave them a deserved raise. But he also had to shut down the government due to Democrats demanding an even more, and very detrimental, increase in spending. And in a true extremely exaggerated fashion, you proclaim that spending "skyrocketed". Again, who would even attempt this narrative? I think I can smell the desperation. Do you have any other whoppers to contribute?
    • He was injured but has returned and he decided not to play baseball this year.
    • There's some truth to that.......some.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...