Jump to content

Ask MrUmp1 your rules question.


Recommended Posts

ART. 2 . . . If a pitcher is replaced while his team is on defense, the substitute pitcher shall pitch to the batter then at bat, or any substitute for that batter, until such batter is put out or reaches first base, or until a third out has been made. To ensure that the requirements of this article be fulfilled, the umpire will deny any coach-defensive player conference that will violate the rule. If a pitcher is incapacitated or guilty of flagrant unsportsmanlike conduct, this rule is ignored. A player may be removed as pitcher and returned as pitcher only once per inning, provided the return as pitcher does not violate either the pitching, substitution or charged conference rule. If the pitcher, because of an injury or being incapacitated, is replaced as pitcher and the above rule is not satisfied, or if his replacement requires more warm-up throws than permitted in 6-2-2 exception, he cannot return to the game as a pitcher.

Article 2 of the handbook makes no reference to starter or reliever. IDK. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

ART. 2 . . . If a pitcher is replaced while his team is on defense, the substitute pitcher shall pitch to the batter then at bat, or any substitute for that batter, until such batter is put out or reaches first base, or until a third out has been made. To ensure that the requirements of this article be fulfilled, the umpire will deny any coach-defensive player conference that will violate the rule. If a pitcher is incapacitated or guilty of flagrant unsportsmanlike conduct, this rule is ignored. A player may be removed as pitcher and returned as pitcher only once per inning, provided the return as pitcher does not violate either the pitching, substitution or charged conference rule. If the pitcher, because of an injury or being incapacitated, is replaced as pitcher and the above rule is not satisfied, or if his replacement requires more warm-up throws than permitted in 6-2-2 exception, he cannot return to the game as a pitcher.

Article 2 of the handbook makes no reference to starter or reliever. IDK. 

Yes I just googeled it - what is a charged conference rule?  Also, the doc I referenced noted something about the 1st batter either reaching 1st base or being called out????

IDK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Whoa said:

Yes I just googeled it - what is a charged conference rule?  Also, the doc I referenced noted something about the 1st batter either reaching 1st base or being called out????

IDK

Its referencing the starting pitcher. The starter has to complete the first at bat (batter gets on base or records an out), barring an injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Obstruction question for Select/MLB rules. 

 

Runner at 1st.  Hitter hits it to the wall.  Their SS is standing on the base and obstructs our runner knocking him down.  While he’s on the ground the the batter passes him up.  Obstruction was called, but then then they called out the batter for passing his teammate.  Runner was given a base but batter was out for the 3rd out. 

 

Delayed dead ball was correct since their was no play at the base.  The rule for this is vague, but I don’t see how a team can commit obstruction and the team that was obstructed gets penalized.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not agree that the runner should be called out. Delayed dead ball then runners awarded bases. Kind of unusual that a runner would pass someone that is that far ahead of them. Sometimes you have to use common sense. If there is a delayed dead ball then a runner gets thrown out trying to take extra bases that's a different thing. Doesn't sound like the case in your play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MrUmp1 said:

I do not agree that the runner should be called out. Delayed dead ball then runners awarded bases. Kind of unusual that a runner would pass someone that is that far ahead of them. Sometimes you have to use common sense. If there is a delayed dead ball then a runner gets thrown out trying to take extra bases that's a different thing. Doesn't sound like the case in your play.

They are 6U.  My runner was laying on the ground crying and the batter was fast.  It was an easy inside the Parker so we were all telling him to score when he hit it  

 I just wanted to be able to tell Harold that he was full of it.  I told he was wrong many times, but he never listens.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

If the base umpire was on the line and had a good look at it, they could get together and reverse call. The proper mechanic is if it looks like trouble, the base ump at first should go out and make call. If base umpire goes out then home plate home will have to get in position to make a call at second or third. That is if it was a 2 man crew. If this was a 3 man crew, it is the 1st base umps call all the way. The old days of the home plate ump has all the lines and all the fly balls is not correct in today's mechanics,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, MrUmp1 said:

If the base umpire was on the line and had a good look at it, they could get together and reverse call. The proper mechanic is if it looks like trouble, the base ump at first should go out and make call. If base umpire goes out then home plate home will have to get in position to make a call at second or third. That is if it was a 2 man crew. If this was a 3 man crew, it is the 1st base umps call all the way. The old days of the home plate ump has all the lines and all the fly balls is not correct in today's mechanics,

Two man crew. I thought the base ump was responsible for the guy on 1st? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, vidor96pirates said:

6a varsity uses 3 man crew usually.  If that was the case 1b umpire is in A, 3b umpire is in C. The ball being hit down the left field line is the plate umpires call.  If the umpire in C got a good look at it he could give the plate what he saw and he makes the call. 

They only had two umpires.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah ok well the base umpire would have been in B usually.  You never cross the dirt and go out on a ball hit to the outfield. He would have to have went over towards third and got the best look he could at it.  He would have also have been watching the runners touch bases as well though.  Unless he saw it clear as day the plate should have had the better view. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

About 2 years ago our catcher was called for a balk. This was during a 13U select game, this was a new one on me. What is the rule on this call? At the end of the game another ump in the stands made the comment that this should have never been called in a 13U game. Bad part about it was the calling ump never broke it down so that the player was aware of what he had done.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a travel league game the field umpire called a balk on the pitcher. The pitcher followed through and delivered the pitch. Batter swings and hits a double to score the winning run. The ump that made the balk call said it was a dead ball and made the runner go back to second and the batter back to the plate. Then advanced the runner to third. My question is, when a ump calls a balk and the pitcher delivers the pitch and the batter hits it. Is it a dead ball when the ump yells balk or since the pitcher delivered the ball it is live and in play. Hard to believe but I’ve seen it called both ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Coach85 said:

In a travel league game the field umpire called a balk on the pitcher. The pitcher followed through and delivered the pitch. Batter swings and hits a double to score the winning run. The ump that made the balk call said it was a dead ball and made the runner go back to second and the batter back to the plate. Then advanced the runner to third. My question is, when a ump calls a balk and the pitcher delivers the pitch and the batter hits it. Is it a dead ball when the ump yells balk or since the pitcher delivered the ball it is live and in play. Hard to believe but I’ve seen it called both ways.

Depends on the league/organization 

In HS it is a dead ball.  

In MLB, NCAA, Babe Ruth, Select the ball is live and the balk is nullified once the runners reach the next base.  So swing away, only good things can happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PhatMack19 said:

Depends on the league/organization 

In HS it is a dead ball.  

In MLB, NCAA, Babe Ruth, Select the ball is live and the balk is nullified once the runners reach the next base.  So swing away, only good things can happen. 

Thank you for clarifying that for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
  • 3 months later...

I see no reason why this would be illegal. Even if he dropped the ball ,unless it rolls past a foul line , it would not be a pitch. Pitchers in the windup may start with both hands in their glove, break their hands apart, then bring them back together before delivery of pitch. There is nothing in the rule that states the ball must stay in hand or glove only. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

need a ruling:

runner at 3rd, 2 strikes on the batter. 2 outs... 

man on 3rd steals home, pitcher does not see him and has a legal pitch, the ball hits the man stealing home in the strike zone while the runners foot is on the home plate. strike would make it strike 3. 

does the run count due to he was safe before the ball hit him? is it a dead ball or live strike three?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • KF89 unpinned and pinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...