Jump to content

DCTF 4A D2

WO-S 89

By WO-S 89
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Matthew328
Matthew328

All rankings are a guess.....there's a lot that goes into them, past performance, returning starters, pedigree of program and coach and there's some hunches/feelings that go into it as well...its not

Dirty_but_Dazzling
Dirty_but_Dazzling

I wouldn't feel so bad about losing to Carthage if I were you. in 2015 Waco LaVega was a straight up BEAST! Carthage played them the next game after yall and was lucky to get the 3 points they di

Mr. Buddy Garrity
Mr. Buddy Garrity

Yes very, that's why I said what I said. 😁

Dirty_but_Dazzling

Dirty_but_Dazzling

Posted
Posted

DII                  

1. Carthage     11-1     9/3

2. Gilmer         14-2    4/7

3.Witchita Falls Hirschi    12-3   8/4

4. WOS            11-2     7/8

5. Tex. Pleasant Grove    8-6    8/5

6. Cuero           13-2     5/8

7. Wimberley     10-3     6/2

8. Glen Rose      10-2     10/7

9. Silsbee          5-5      8/8

10. Geronimo Navarro      10-3     5/7

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dirty_but_Dazzling

Dirty_but_Dazzling

Posted
Posted

DII

11. Aubrey           12-2       3/7

12. Bellville          12-1        7/5

13. Sinton             11-2       4/6

14. Van                  12-1       4/6

15. Lago Vista      10-4       5/8

16. Salado             7-4        5/6

17. Jasper              6-5        7/4

18. Devine             8-3        6/8

19. Sunnyvale        6-6       6/6

20. Ingleside          9-3        7/6

Link to comment
Share on other sites
aTmfan06

aTmfan06

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Dirty_but_Dazzling said:

DII

11. Aubrey           12-2       3/7

12. Bellville          12-1        7/5

13. Sinton             11-2       4/6

14. Van                  12-1       4/6

15. Lago Vista      10-4       5/8

16. Salado             7-4        5/6

17. Jasper              6-5        7/4

18. Devine             8-3        6/8

19. Sunnyvale        6-6       6/6

20. Ingleside          9-3        7/6

Pretty high for us to…. Losing Briggs and Reece is gonna hurt… We do have a couple good sophomore’s ready to step up, but Bellville will be back to more of a traditional ground and pound and defensive strategy to win ballgames. I will say we will be big on the O line and D line this year which is a plus.  Sophomore DL DJ Sanders got a Baylor offer earlier this summer and I have a feeling it won’t be the last.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, aTmfan06 said:

Pretty high for us to…. Losing Briggs and Reece is gonna hurt… We do have a couple good sophomore’s ready to step up, but Bellville will be back to more of a traditional ground and pound and defensive strategy to win ballgames. I will say we will be big on the O line and D line this year which is a plus.  Sophomore DL DJ Sanders got a Baylor offer earlier this summer and I have a feeling it won’t be the last.

Not just to be a hater, but how does a team that lost in the first round last year to a team that lost in the second round find themselves ranked at #9? 

Just predictions more than rankings, I guess. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
89Falcon

89Falcon

Posted
Posted
58 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Not just to be a hater, but how does a team that lost in the first round last year to a team that lost in the second round find themselves ranked at #9? 

Just predictions more than rankings, I guess. 

 

It has to do with "this year" not being "last year". Teams do not always perform the same from year to year. There have been scenarios where a team "won a State Championship one year" and then "did not win a State Championship the next year". In extreme case, teams that "did not make the playoffs one year" actually "made the playoffs the next year".

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
Just now, 89Falcon said:

It has to do with "this year" not being "last year". Teams do not always perform the same from year to year. There have been scenarios where a team "won a State Championship one year" and then "did not win a State Championship the next year".  

Of course... but it's kinda junky to say "here are our rankings, based on zero evidence/performance.... it's a guess, honestly."  I can even understand teams ending up with a higher ranking than they deserve for this year based on performances last year by kids who have graduated.  But at least there's a little bit of credibility there, even if it's only by inference or association.  But to say, "yeah, the last time we saw this team they were literally getting shelled by a kinda crappy team that lost the next week.  But that makes them a nine in my book" means the rankings are just a popularity contest and mean nothing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
aTmfan06

aTmfan06

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

Not just to be a hater, but how does a team that lost in the first round last year to a team that lost in the second round find themselves ranked at #9? 

Just predictions more than rankings, I guess. 

 

My post was about Bellville. I’m assuming your talking about Silsbee though lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

That rivalry game between Silsbee and Bridge City oughta be a fun one eh?? 😁

I didn't say that, lol.  

I felt kinda the same way when we were ranked fairly high at the start of the 2017 season... it was based on our 2016 record and a bunch those kids were gone.  It felt like our ranking was too high, but it was understandable because it was at least based on a record.  Silsbee's 2022 ranking is just puzzling. I mean, imagine if for some unknown reason Texas Tech was ranked in the NCAA top ten this preseason. 

 

Huh?  Based on what? A good receiver prospect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, aTmfan06 said:

My post was about Bellville. I’m assuming your talking about Silsbee though lol

Yes... that's the intended recipient of all of the shade I'm throwing.  They could very well turn out to be a top ten team, who knows?  I just don't see a reason to rank them so highly now.  There were literally 63 other teams with playoffs equally 

I think WOS's ranking might be higher than they will actually end up placing based on the changes in the program, but at least they earned theirs, so to speak. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Reagan
      Political Memes

      By Reagan · Posted

    • Reagan
      Coordinated Federal Effort To Target Trump!

      By Reagan · Posted

      Judge Aileen Cannon unsealed a trove of documents Monday that appear to reveal a coordinated effort within the JoeBama administration to target Donald Trump with political prosecution after he left office. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • Englebert
      It’s kinda weird…

      By Englebert · Posted

      This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • Woodshed
      APRIL 23rd SCORES

      By Woodshed · Posted

      Diboll - 1  Central Heights- 0
    • Englebert
      It’s kinda weird…

      By Englebert · Posted

      Just to expound a little further, so you are not confused...I, along with so many others, are laughing at your desperation. You are working overtime, nay, double even triple time, trying to convince normal people Trump was bad for the country. His policies provided for peace all over the world, low gas prices, low food prices, energy independence, closed border, low inflation, record low unemployment, and on and on and on. You try to counter this narrative by saying unemployment skyrocketed on his watch. You said this knowing full well the unemployment rate went up due to Covid. Your narrative is just so laughable, to the point of side-splitting hilarity. Who would even attempt this asinine narrative? Now, even if you get past the utter stupidity of that MSNBC talking point, you provide another side-splitting hilarious tidbit of evidence to back your claim of Trump being bad for the country. You actually tried to tie the stock market going down to Trump...after Covid. You, I, and everybody else knows the stock market was flourishing under Trump...until Covid hit. This argument is just as bad as the other one. Again, who would even attempt this narrative? The only thing you could remotely muster that had any sliver of truthfulness, is that spending increased. Sure, Trump rebuilt the military and gave them a deserved raise. But he also had to shut down the government due to Democrats demanding an even more, and very detrimental, increase in spending. And in a true extremely exaggerated fashion, you proclaim that spending "skyrocketed". Again, who would even attempt this narrative? I think I can smell the desperation. Do you have any other whoppers to contribute?

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...