Jump to content

Breyer retiring


PhatMack19

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, 5GallonBucket said:

And he still lives in dc 

I honestly think he'd be a pretty good candidate.... somebody that understands the legislative and executive branches because he's worked in both... and he's a freaking constitutional lawyer.  I just wish he wasn't such an activist.

 

I don't see him giving up his lucrative endorsement deals to go into relative seclusion on the SC, much less when he had so much conflict (you LIE) when he was our president.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

I honestly think he'd be a pretty good candidate.... somebody that understands the legislative and executive branches because he's worked in both... and he's a freaking constitutional lawyer.  I just wish he wasn't such an activist.

 

I don't see him giving up his lucrative endorsement deals to go into relative seclusion on the SC, much less when he had so much conflict (you LIE) when he was our president.  

He doesn't need to be on the Court.  He already has 2 doing his bidding!  They are activist -- not Constitutionalist!   He'll probably pick this one.  But it's left up to the Republicans and Manchin and Sinema to ensure a Constitutionalist.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

I honestly think he'd be a pretty good candidate.... somebody that understands the legislative and executive branches because he's worked in both... and he's a freaking constitutional lawyer.  I just wish he wasn't such an activist.

 

I don't see him giving up his lucrative endorsement deals to go into relative seclusion on the SC, much less when he had so much conflict (you LIE) when he was our president.  

When I quoted bad dog I was referring to Obama being the one behind the curtains

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, 5GallonBucket said:

When I quoted bad dog I was referring to Obama being the one behind the curtains

Quote from Obama: 

“I used to say if I can make an arrangement where I had a stand-in or front-man or front-woman and they had an earpiece in and I was just in my basement in my sweats looking through the stuff and I could sort of deliver the lines while someone was doing all the talking and ceremony, I’d be fine with that because I found the work fascinating,” Obama quipped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all know who he ll (puppet master)pick…. 1st this or 1st that doesn’t matter the qualifications(the hell with the constitution) it’s all about doing something 1st to get people s attention away from how terrible him and his colleagues are doing.

1st gay Or lesbian

1st black woman

1st trans

1st non binary

1st atheist 

We all know the their m o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 5GallonBucket said:

We all know who he ll (puppet master)pick…. 1st this or 1st that doesn’t matter the qualifications(the hell with the constitution) it’s all about doing something 1st to get people s attention away from how terrible him and his colleagues are doing.

1st gay Or lesbian

1st black woman

1st trans

1st non binary

1st atheist 

We all know the their m o

Oh, that's right -- he did say it's going to be a black woman if he ever had the opportunity.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, baddog said:

Me either. He just shouldn’t make black and female the only qualifications. That is so racist it stinks.

It amazes that people aren't like "you get the matches!  I'll bring some diesel" when they hear outright racist statements being made and lauded.

 

There's no difference between filling a panel of exclusively black women and a panel of exclusively white men exclusively because of their race/gender.  Both are blatantly racist.  The fact that people think that this "new" racism is somehow better than the "old" racism blows my mind. 

 

I'd LOVE to see a black woman appointed to the Supreme Court.  I have no doubt that a few of the candidates being floated would make fine justices.  But the selection mechanism is all wrong, and the fact that nobody has a problem with it is mind-blowing.  Literally the highest court in the land, the final arbiter of all matters or racism/oppression in our country, is being populated using the most racist of all possible selection processes.  Can we be any more stupid?


You could literally make the argument "well, white men have lost three seats (i honestly don't know how many have been "lost") so we need to make sure a white dude gets this next one" and you'd probably get stoned to death. 

Promotions based on race only divide us further.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally admitting what we already know about yobama's 2 picks!

From the article:  "Senate Judiciary Committee member Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) said she wants Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer’s replacement to be someone “who will consider the impact, the effects of whatever decision-making is on people in our country so that they are not making decisions just based on” the law."  This individual is an United States Senator and knows NOTHING about the courts!!

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,902
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • From what I read, the state intended for there to be no drainage. It was to act as a dam or levee just like the hurricane levee around Port Arthur. It worked to perfection.  In doing so, the water had to pile up somewhere.  Like in Causby that I mentioned above, the Supreme Court ruled in that case that the federal government took his land by merely flying planes over it but low enough that the engine noise was disrupting.  
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up shocker!
    • Exactly. Of course changing realignment to make matchups more fair helps, but fairness always helps, and that shouldn’t be a knock against PNG. But, they created the fixed divisions in what, 2018? How did PnG do in that setup before Joseph showed up? Elite coaching mixed with good players and good luck, and a level playing field, yeah that helps a lot. But for anyone trying to say PNG had it easy, why don’t the other 120-ish teams in 5aD2 do just as well?
    • It’s not a land issue, it’s a demographic issue. The population in PN-GISD is getting younger. Old folks are dying off, and their homes are being bought by young families moving in with increasing frequency. Factor in that PN-GISD is more attractive than some of its neighbors right now thanks to the newer schools, the quality of education and the recent extracurricular success, and you have an easy explanation for the ~20% enrollment growth that’s occurred over the last ten years while the neighboring Jefferson County districts have all either flat-lined or shrunk. You also have an explanation for Groves posting the highest growth rate in the county and the third highest in the MSA on the 2020 census. We’re a lot closer to 5ADI numbers than people realize.
    • Dang i cant believe they past up on Cornel Thompson 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...