Jump to content

Lumberton 62 Silsbee 123/FINAL


Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, Hooohead.com said:

Oh wow....i said 106-58...i guess they were upset from the celebration lastyear on there court at the end of the game

#15 went over to Lumberton student section - made some motion and said something - i think like lumberton coach did last year in that section - not sure 

some kids got offended - but police there to make sure nothing happened 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Tigers94 said:

Was an interesting game if you stopped watching after the first 2 or 3 minutes.

Two Silsbee kids did not play tonight. Ashton Cartwright and 6`4 freshman Billy Boulwen suited up but saw no action. Boulwen has been MIA all together till tonight. Hopefully he can get a little playing time under his belt this year.

I was at that game when Boulwen got hurt. It was against Episcopal in that 2nd showcase the day after thanksgiving.  He was in a lot of pain. I'm glad it was not a season ending injury, so that he can play again this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, RaiderGirl2010 said:

Well when you beat Silsbee and win district what do you think would happen lol

It is all good. Get your celebration on.  It happened a few years ago when Lumberton beat Silsbee lite while some key Silsbee b-ballers were still playing football.  I even saw Yates celebrate when they beat Silsbee in 2019 playoffs.  Then again Silsbee did some celebrating too when they beat Yates.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oldschool2 said:

Lumberton struggling a little bit without their 6'6 D1 player? Who knew... 

lumberton’s best overall player who’s a post has played in 3 games all year and other post player has played in 1 game all year. Those 2 guys are pretty good athletes and you can tell it has  hurt them not having that size like they normally do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/13/2022 at 9:59 AM, Sportsilove2 said:

lumberton’s best overall player who’s a post has played in 3 games all year and other post player has played in 1 game all year. Those 2 guys are pretty good athletes and you can tell it has  hurt them not having that size like they normally do

There's an underlying point to my statement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,889
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cihnen
    Newest Member
    cihnen
    Joined


  • Posts

    • That’s a president? How embarrassing. 
    • Really good hire! As I stated previously on this thread, Mike T has been an essential part of WB’s success the last few years & is a student of the game & I have a ton of respect for how he goes about things as a coach. Big on teaching kids how to do things the right way to prepare them for not only basketball but the game of life. He’ll be fine there, my only question is what kind of talent does WB have returning?  Best thing about this situation for Mike T is WB will be 5A for at least the next 2 years, so he should win a lot of games & have some deep playoff runs.
    • So which coaches kid gets the QB job? Trotter or Barrier
    • A Winnie land owner (and others) sued the State of Texas after they built IH-10 a few feet higher in order to help contain storm flooding. Sure enough a hurricane hit and flooded the land. The storm improvements worked!! Unfortunately the state sacrificed several people’s properties in using the interstate highway as a dam.  Richard DeVillier tried to sue Texas under our laws and Constitution and the US Constitution under the Fifth Amendment “taking clause” (eminent domain). After a favorable ruling in the federal district court on the right to sue Texas directly, the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans overturned that ruling and said that the DeVlier had no authority to sue Texas directly.  On Tuesday a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled that DeVillier and others had the right to sue Texas directly under Texas law and under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. The case is now sent back down to the lower court. DeVillier and others have not won their lawsuits as the case has not been decided on its merits at a trial. He still has to go to prove his case. What they did win was a unanimous Supreme Court agreeing that he has the right to bring Texas to trial for taking his property with just compensation.   
    • Don't jump?!  What?!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...