Jump to content

Hamshire-Fannett 34 Sweeny 10/FINAL

AggiesAreWe

By AggiesAreWe
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

pefectmakespractice

pefectmakespractice

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

HF has had a fantastic year.  It sucks that Carthage in the second round is their reward for it.  Hoping for a best case scenario similar to their performance against WOS where they’re able to play hard and keep it respectable.

We take away the last 5 minutes of the 2nd quarter and its a one score ball game.   If we dont put the 2nd string secondary in against silsbee in the last 7 minutes, we beat silsbee.  

We may not win Thursday but cart is going to have their hands full.  

Praying for an upset!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Horton

Horton

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, pefectmakespractice said:

We take away the last 5 minutes of the 2nd quarter and its a one score ball game.   If we dont put the 2nd string secondary in against silsbee in the last 7 minutes, we beat silsbee.  

We may not win Thursday but cart is going to have their hands full.  

Praying for an upset!

Gatesville had a total of 20 yards rushing and 40 yards passing against the Dawg defense. 
Looking forward to a good ball game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest mrtomcat

Guest mrtomcat

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, pefectmakespractice said:

Gville isnt HF.  Do we year stats for gville and HF 

I think its going to closer than what others except.  

I am willing to bet any wager you'd like that HF does not get within 21 points when the buzzer sounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bullets13

bullets13

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, pefectmakespractice said:

Gville isnt HF.  Do we year stats for gville and HF 

I think its going to closer than what others except.  

If HF keeps it’s closer than gatesville did then they’ve done a decent job.  Carthage’s offense isn’t quite as good as the last couple of years, but they’re still by far the best team HF has played this year.  Their defense doesn’t give up much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
house

house

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

If HF keeps it’s closer than gatesville did then they’ve done a decent job.  Carthage’s offense isn’t quite as good as the last couple of years, but they’re still by far the best team HF has played this year.  Their defense doesn’t give up much. 

Can’t argue with this post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Horton

Horton

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, house said:

Can’t argue with this post.

I don’t think HF will score at all. 
The Dawg D is nothing like you have ever seen before. 
The last six teams were under 40 yards rushing and two of those were minus yards running the ball. 
If HF can cause 5 or 6 turnovers, they might have a chance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bullets13

bullets13

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Horton said:

I don’t think HF will score at all. 
The Dawg D is nothing like you have ever seen before. 
The last six teams were under 40 yards rushing and two of those were minus yards running the ball. 
If HF can cause 5 or 6 turnovers, they might have a chance. 

HF will struggle to score.  Their QB is good enough that he might be able to bust off a long run or two to get them into the end zone.  They won’t be scoring on long drives.  I think the HF defense should hopefully be able to make some plays and keep it from getting out of hand like they did against WOS

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ctown81

ctown81

Posted
Posted
On 11/13/2021 at 2:17 PM, Horton said:

I don’t think HF will score at all. 
The Dawg D is nothing like you have ever seen before. 
The last six teams were under 40 yards rushing and two of those were minus yards running the ball. 
If HF can cause 5 or 6 turnovers, they might have a chance. 

That's a big concern of mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Reagan
      Political Memes

      By Reagan · Posted

    • Reagan
      Coordinated Federal Effort To Target Trump!

      By Reagan · Posted

      Judge Aileen Cannon unsealed a trove of documents Monday that appear to reveal a coordinated effort within the JoeBama administration to target Donald Trump with political prosecution after he left office. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • Englebert
      It’s kinda weird…

      By Englebert · Posted

      This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • Woodshed
      APRIL 23rd SCORES

      By Woodshed · Posted

      Diboll - 1  Central Heights- 0
    • Englebert
      It’s kinda weird…

      By Englebert · Posted

      Just to expound a little further, so you are not confused...I, along with so many others, are laughing at your desperation. You are working overtime, nay, double even triple time, trying to convince normal people Trump was bad for the country. His policies provided for peace all over the world, low gas prices, low food prices, energy independence, closed border, low inflation, record low unemployment, and on and on and on. You try to counter this narrative by saying unemployment skyrocketed on his watch. You said this knowing full well the unemployment rate went up due to Covid. Your narrative is just so laughable, to the point of side-splitting hilarity. Who would even attempt this asinine narrative? Now, even if you get past the utter stupidity of that MSNBC talking point, you provide another side-splitting hilarious tidbit of evidence to back your claim of Trump being bad for the country. You actually tried to tie the stock market going down to Trump...after Covid. You, I, and everybody else knows the stock market was flourishing under Trump...until Covid hit. This argument is just as bad as the other one. Again, who would even attempt this narrative? The only thing you could remotely muster that had any sliver of truthfulness, is that spending increased. Sure, Trump rebuilt the military and gave them a deserved raise. But he also had to shut down the government due to Democrats demanding an even more, and very detrimental, increase in spending. And in a true extremely exaggerated fashion, you proclaim that spending "skyrocketed". Again, who would even attempt this narrative? I think I can smell the desperation. Do you have any other whoppers to contribute?

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...