Jump to content

Fort Bend Hightower at Port Arthur Memorial Bi-District Round predictions 11/12


Recommended Posts

Man, definitely wanted to avoid this one. PAM could’ve beaten Angleton in a tough defensive game because they’re offense isn’t that good. FBH can play defense AND score though. 
 

Turnovers and penalties can always play a role in outcomes but just playing straight up, FBH is a more complete football team than PAM is. I would probably have it FBH -13.5, that’s a rough loss to Friendswood. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, D3zii said:

I believe Memorial can win this...

But I also know Hightower can too

I think this game will mirror our 2018 playoff game with Richmond Foster at home, but with a higher scoring margin in the end with Fort Bend Hightower winning. Hope i'm wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cougtalk said:

I believe PAM and it’s district is about to get first round swept. 

That would make their district 1-15 the last four years in the playoffs. I would imagine Friendswood moves over to 10-5A-D1 when Hightower and Paetow move up which should help 9-5A-D1's record. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, panamamyers said:

In defense of the district, no other district would be rolling up the wins either against this particular Manvel district. If we played the HISD district first we'd be 15-1 over the last four years.

 

What's Crosby's record against teams from that district the last four years? 1-3?

it's all relative.

Last four years we've only played the #1 from that district 4 times and have 1 more win then the entirety of your district against them. 

Before that we were 2-0 against Angleton but that's like what 6-7 years ago? Since then we've scrimmaged Angleton. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, panamamyers said:

In defense of the district, no other district would be rolling up the wins either against this particular Manvel district. If we played the HISD district first we'd be 15-1 over the last four years.

 

What's Crosby's record against teams from that district the last four years? 1-3?

it's all relative.

Lol, so your whole argument is that Crosby can’t consistently beat Manvel? Only other team we’ve ever played from that district was Angleton who we donkey-stomped 38-15 and 34-0 in our two contest. Most of your district is already HISD caliber so I doubt y’all would be 15-1 against them. Y’all might get swept if you had to play out district too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cougar14.2 said:

Lol, so your whole argument is that Crosby can’t consistently beat Manvel? Only other team we’ve ever played from that district was Angleton who we donkey-stomped 38-15 and 34-0 in our two contest. Most of your district is already HISD caliber so I doubt y’all would be 15-1 against them. Y’all might get swept if you had to play out district too. 

Isn't this the same person that poo-pooed North Shore?  Swept by 12 5A D2?  Nah......

Anyway, I picked Hightower trying to win week 12 picks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, panamamyers said:

Settle down fellas.

There's no shame in Manvel having your number.

They are a great team in a great district with three teams that all would have beat the fool out of Crosby just like Manvel did.

Lol, a 14 point loss in a very winnable game is getting the fool beat out of you now? Angleton made the playoffs and Crosby would ran though them like we toilet paper like we did the previous times we played them. They didn't stop our starters one time when we lined up earlier this year. 

I remember you saying similar crap about Crosby only being able to beat schools east of the Trinity. Now that we cleaned out the southern half of the state it's "y'all can't beat Manvel consistently and these other teams would probably beat you too", lol. In actuality Manvel is the only team currently in 5A in the entire Houston area that has a winning record against Crosby the last 20 years. Everything else you're saying is pure speculation and you've already been wrong about it multiple times. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...