Jump to content

LUMBERTON 27 VIDOR 28/Final


AggiesAreWe

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, Boneyard Boys said:

Was that back in the Rick Colbert days or farther back than that? He was lightning fast and a great athlete but not necessarily a good QB for that type of offense.

Yes.  They had an undefeated team throughout junior high and freshman year and looked to be like a really good team.  Brought in a spread/west coast style offense for 03-04 and it completely messed up the slot t timing those kids were used to.  Rick Culbert went on to get a scholarship to Arkansas and played one season.  Sean O'Bannion, another speedster, now does some coaching for the pirates.  You're right though; Rick was fast.  Saw him clocked at low 4.4 range many times, along with Brock Sherrod, and Sean.  I seem to remember Rick running a 4.37 once.  FLYING.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Raider24 said:

It’s Sunday now and I believe the shock is beginning to wear off! I’m starting to get feeling back. Church, then Cowboys, then watch a lil Lindale film. 

When we played them in the playoffs last year they had a big D1 RB who was a load and a tall D1 DE that they would bring in at WR to throw him the jump ball. I believe those guys are gone but they still have their QB who is really good and a couple of nice receivers from last years team. Their offense was a multiple set, balanced attack.

Cowboys better wake up in hurry… 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/6/2021 at 8:37 AM, PirateNole984 said:

Won’t be long and Vidor will be back in 5A. I can see Vidor and Lumberton taking Crosby’s and Barber Hills spot when those 2 move up a classification. 

What makes you think Vidor will be back in 5A… just curious

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Raider24 said:

Vidor & Lumberton should both be good for the next 2 yrs! 

Oh they’re good for sure for the next two years… and honestly I don’t see Vidor moving up beyond that in any near future.    I was just curious what made them think Vidor would be moving up… there is no evidence to suggest that will happen…Lumberton is growing so I could see them moving up sooner or later

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, vhs said:

Oh they’re good for sure for the next two years… and honestly I don’t see Vidor moving up beyond that in any near future.    I was just curious what made them think Vidor would be moving up… there is no evidence to suggest that will happen…Lumberton is growing so I could see them moving up sooner or later

All our growth is in the younger age. New subdivisions are younger couples with young kids. Haven’t hit the high school yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Raider24 said:

It’s Sunday now and I believe the shock is beginning to wear off! I’m starting to get feeling back. Church, then Cowboys, then watch a lil Lindale film. 

Watch their tacking on defense, the highlights I saw for both sides looks like we can beat their defense, we just got to slow their offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/6/2021 at 12:07 PM, Boneyard Boys said:

Was that back in the Rick Colbert days or farther back than that? He was lightning fast and a great athlete but not necessarily a good QB for that type of offense.

That was when Rick Culbert was the qb, yep. He was backup qb the year before but mainly played defense and he was darn good at that too. Every so often he'd be on offense for receiver. Great athlete. Dangerous return man. Not ideal for West coast offense. I can only believe that west coast was implemented due to the 7 on 7 success of that group. I would have loved to have this offense with that group. Not saying they had better athletes but it would have been interesting. And the defense from 00-02 ... just game changing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, TenaciousK said:

That was when Rick Culbert was the qb, yep. He was backup qb the year before but mainly played defense and he was darn good at that too. Every so often he'd be on offense for receiver. Great athlete. Dangerous return man. Not ideal for West coast offense. I can only believe that west coast was implemented due to the 7 on 7 success of that group. I would have loved to have this offense with that group. Not saying they had better athletes but it would have been interesting. And the defense from 00-02 ... just game changing. 

Do you remember what offense Vidor ran between 04-06 before we switched to the Slot T when Haegquist (sp?) was QB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, raideroldtimer said:

Watch their tacking on defense, the highlights I saw for both sides looks like we can beat their defense, we just got to slow their offense. 

Evidently Dist 9 takes a lackadaisical approach to defense.  Their game plan is simply to outscore the other team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, piratevillain said:

Do you remember what offense Vidor ran between 04-06 before we switched to the Slot T when Haegquist (sp?) was QB?

i do not remember it specifically, but i did manage to catch a few games in those years. I thought Andy was a solid threat at QB. He had the wheels to take off and burn. Seemed to be pretty balanced attack though. I found this highlight reel on youtube. I see wishbone, i formation, and veer for sure. Andy seemed to target #5 Perry a lot, as he was a pretty good receiver in his own right.

This is the hidden content, please

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, TenaciousK said:

i do not remember it specifically, but i did manage to catch a few games in those years. I thought Andy was a solid threat at QB. He had the wheels to take off and burn. Seemed to be pretty balanced attack though. I found this highlight reel on youtube. I see wishbone, i formation, and veer for sure. Andy seemed to target #5 Perry a lot, as he was a pretty good receiver in his own right.

This is the hidden content, please

 

That’s awesome, good music too. That RB 32 had some wheels, love watching Vidor sling that ball around lol. Man those gold helmets were sweet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

LB - ACL

Offensive Left Tackle - Broken Fibula

I absolutely hate hearing about this, especially right when the playoffs are beginning. I heard about the LB, and I told RaiderGirl that during pretty much the first half, I seen him limping and grabbing his knee. Hate that for y'all! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

The OT was a great player too. 

The OL - no headlines and little or no recognition, but to have a winning team, one of the most important components.  Without a good effort from them QB’s can’t setup and make their throws, RB’s rarely clear the line of scrimmage.  Them hoggs make things work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...