Jump to content

Kyle Rittenhouse


thetragichippy

Recommended Posts

OK, I just looked up Wisconsin firearm law and it does require a license from Wisconsin or a reciprocal state to carry concealed. If the guy that Rittenhouse shot does not have a concealed carry license, he committed a crime.

I believe in his testimony he said he accidentally pointed at Rittenhouse. That leads me to 3 conclusions. 
1. he probably admitted to a crime while on the witness stand.

2. he lied under oath (which can’t be proven 

3. I am sure he intentionally pointed at Rittenhouse meaning that he likely committed aggravated assault and a felony which is why he said that he accidentally did so while under oath.

Let’s see, you were chasing a guy with a rifle and you see him fall down, you know that you have a pistol in your hand and you run up to this guy who is now laying on his back and you pointed at him… But it was an accident. If that is true, why did you run up on Rittenhouse with a pistol in your hand while Rittenhouse is holding a rifle? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/9/2021 at 5:23 AM, tvc184 said:

OK, I just looked up Wisconsin firearm law and it does require a license from Wisconsin or a reciprocal state to carry concealed. If the guy that Rittenhouse shot does not have a concealed carry license, he committed a crime.

I believe in his testimony he said he accidentally pointed at Rittenhouse. That leads me to 3 conclusions. 
1. he probably admitted to a crime while on the witness stand.

2. he lied under oath (which can’t be proven 

3. I am sure he intentionally pointed at Rittenhouse meaning that he likely committed aggravated assault and a felony which is why he said that he accidentally did so while under oath.

Let’s see, you were chasing a guy with a rifle and you see him fall down, you know that you have a pistol in your hand and you run up to this guy who is now laying on his back and you pointed at him… But it was an accident. If that is true, why did you run up on Rittenhouse with a pistol in your hand while Rittenhouse is holding a rifle? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

Don't quote me on this, but I read (don't judge me) that the guy with the pistol who got shot was actually a felon and illegally carrying HIS firearm.  I'd like to see that from a reputable source, though.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Don't quote me on this, but I read (don't judge me) that the guy with the pistol who got shot was actually a felon and illegally carrying HIS firearm.  I'd like to see that from a reputable source, though.  

Judge you? 😂

I have read that also that he is a convicted felon. If that’s true, with the video and his admission under oath, if he is not prosecuted, that is a miscarriage of justice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really struggle with how delusional the left has become in general.  Don't get me wrong, there are some seriously delusional people on the right as well, but the ratio is skewed incredibly far to the left.  All of the evidence, and there is a LOT of it, (including clear video of all shootings) points towards self-defense.  Nearly all of the prosecution's witnesses are proving the case of self-defense.  The prosecution is not following the law and disobeying judge's orders in an attempt to illegally sway the jury (or to put the weight of dismissal on the judge to avoid losing when the jury returns).  And somehow, through all of this, the left has come not to the conclusion that Rittenhouse was defending himself, but that the judge is a biased, neo-nazi, unfair cheater?  Some of the news articles and social media comments I've been reading are mind blowing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bullets13 said:

I really struggle with how delusional the left has become in general.  Don't get me wrong, there are some seriously delusional people on the right as well, but the ratio is skewed incredibly far to the left.  All of the evidence, and there is a LOT of it, (including clear video of all shootings) points towards self-defense.  Nearly all of the prosecution's witnesses are proving the case of self-defense.  The prosecution is not following the law and disobeying judge's orders in an attempt to illegally sway the jury (or to put the weight of dismissal on the judge to avoid losing when the jury returns).  And somehow, through all of this, the left has come not to the conclusion that Rittenhouse was defending himself, but that the judge is a biased, neo-nazi, unfair cheater?  Some of the news articles and social media comments I've been reading are mind blowing. 

Yes.  I have seen enough comments from people reading the news articles and some  claim this is all about race. Yesterday I watched an MSNBC Producer and commentator on the show, The Young Turks, admit that she thought Rittenhouse chased down the first guy and shot him. Now with a video from the trail, she has seen that it was Rittenhouse running for his life and the convicted sex offender chasing him down. Oop….. But I wonder where she got this bogus information to begin with? Gee, could it be from the news media is not reporting there facts?

You have a white guy who is accused of shooting three white guys and he has charges brought by a white district attorney, defended by white lawyers in front of a white judge… And it’s all about race?

There are so many claims that Rittenhouse illegally possessed the firearm (he was a couple of months too young) or he lived out of state or he could’ve been somewhere else and somehow any of that negates the right of self defense AND should cause murder charges to be brought. HUH?

Actually there is some validity to race game. Let’s play my favorite game, what if.

So let’s make this about race. What if a young black female in Wisconsin is walking in an area of town that is not so good. She is doing nothing wrong and is simply walking home. A convicted sex offender attacks her, trying to sexually assault and maybe kill her. The young woman pulls a handgun out of her purse and  shoots and kills a guy. It is clearly a case of lawful self-defense.

However…

The young woman is 21 years old but did not get a concealed handgun license. In Wisconsin you can carry openly but can only conceal if you have a license. In other words, she could’ve had it in a holster on the outside of her purse or worn it in a holster attached are jeans or something similar and it would be legal. Unfortunately she stuck it inside her purse. That  is a crime in Wisconsin and even though she is lawfully in her right of self-defense the DA charges her with murder not because in self-defense was unlawful but because she illegally possess a handgun. So now this woman who actually defended her life against a sexual predator, is facing life in prison.

And…

Like Rittenhouse, she was a part of town she shouldn’t have been in. Yes it was legal and she has a right to come and go but it was not the smartest thing in the world. For that reason, let’s charge her with Murder.

Some of the same people who are complaining about Rittenhouse would  almost certainly have a different opinion. Far from being put on trial for murder, she would be seen as a roll model of a young black woman standing up for herself.  If the DA brought charges against her with the facts as I have described, there would be large protests outside of the court  room and they might turn into riots. 

How many people doubt that would be true? People from the left would be claiming that maybe she does have some charges for concealing a handgun (or maybe not even then) but you can’t translate that into murder charges. You can’t say that she did not make a wise choice in where she walked so she deserves to go to prison  for life….. yet that is exactly what some of the same people are saying about Kyle Rittenhouse.

So maybe some peoples’ opinion it was about race.

I feel like many of the people who are now happy that Kyle Rittenhouse is being charged with murder would have an exact opposite opinion if it was as my what if scenario. I also think that people who are defending Rittenhouse, would also defend this theoretical black female and not want her in prison for killing a violent sex offender and defending her own life. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tvc184 said:

Yes.  I have seen enough comments from people reading the news articles and some  claim this is all about race. Yesterday I watched an MSNBC Producer and commentator on the show, The Young Turks, admit that she thought Rittenhouse chased down the first guy and shot him. Now with a video from the trail, she has seen that it was Rittenhouse running for his life and the convicted sex offender chasing him down. Oop….. But I wonder where she got this bogus information to begin with? Gee, could it be from the news media is not reporting there facts?

You have a white guy who is accused of shooting three white guys and he has charges brought by a white district attorney, defended by white lawyers in front of a white judge… And it’s all about race?

There are so many claims that Rittenhouse illegally possessed the firearm (he was a couple of months too young) or he lived out of state or he could’ve been somewhere else and somehow any of that negates the right of self defense AND should cause murder charges to be brought. HUH?

Actually there is some validity to race game. Let’s play my favorite game, what if.

So let’s make this about race. What if a young black female in Wisconsin is walking in an area of town that is not so good. She is doing nothing wrong and is simply walking home. A convicted sex offender attacks her, trying to sexually assault and maybe kill her. The young woman pulls a handgun out of her purse and  shoots and kills a guy. It is clearly a case of lawful self-defense.

However…

The young woman is 21 years old but did not get a concealed handgun license. In Wisconsin you can carry openly but can only conceal if you have a license. In other words, she could’ve had it in a holster on the outside of her purse or worn it in a holster attached are jeans or something similar and it would be legal. Unfortunately she stuck it inside her purse. That  is a crime in Wisconsin and even though she is lawfully in her right of self-defense the DA charges her with murder not because in self-defense was unlawful but because she illegally possess a handgun. So now this woman who actually defended her life against a sexual predator, is facing life in prison.

And…

Like Rittenhouse, she was a part of town she shouldn’t have been in. Yes it was legal and she has a right to come and go but it was not the smartest thing in the world. For that reason, let’s charge her with Murder.

Some of the same people who are complaining about Rittenhouse would  almost certainly have a different opinion. Far from being put on trial for murder, she would be seen as a roll model of a young black woman standing up for herself.  If the DA brought charges against her with the facts as I have described, there would be large protests outside of the court  room and they might turn into riots. 

How many people doubt that would be true? People from the left would be claiming that maybe she does have some charges for concealing a handgun (or maybe not even then) but you can’t translate that into murder charges. You can’t say that she did not make a wise choice in where she walked so she deserves to go to prison  for life….. yet that is exactly what some of the same people are saying about Kyle Rittenhouse.

So maybe some peoples’ opinion it was about race.

I feel like many of the people who are now happy that Kyle Rittenhouse is being charged with murder would have an exact opposite opinion if it was as my what if scenario. I also think that people who are defending Rittenhouse, would also defend this theoretical black female and not want her in prison for killing a violent sex offender and defending her own life. 

If the sex offender who attacked the black female was a white male, it would be a good kill…. White man baaaaad. He deserved to die. No questions asked. 
 

Rittenhouse showed great courage and control defending himself. I know taking the stand in his defense was stressful and emotional, but I would have felt better had he had more composure. That’s just me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, tvc184 said:

Yes.  I have seen enough comments from people reading the news articles and some  claim this is all about race. Yesterday I watched an MSNBC Producer and commentator on the show, The Young Turks, admit that she thought Rittenhouse chased down the first guy and shot him. Now with a video from the trail, she has seen that it was Rittenhouse running for his life and the convicted sex offender chasing him down. Oop….. But I wonder where she got this bogus information to begin with? Gee, could it be from the news media is not reporting there facts?

You have a white guy who is accused of shooting three white guys and he has charges brought by a white district attorney, defended by white lawyers in front of a white judge… And it’s all about race?

There are so many claims that Rittenhouse illegally possessed the firearm (he was a couple of months too young) or he lived out of state or he could’ve been somewhere else and somehow any of that negates the right of self defense AND should cause murder charges to be brought. HUH?

Actually there is some validity to race game. Let’s play my favorite game, what if.

So let’s make this about race. What if a young black female in Wisconsin is walking in an area of town that is not so good. She is doing nothing wrong and is simply walking home. A convicted sex offender attacks her, trying to sexually assault and maybe kill her. The young woman pulls a handgun out of her purse and  shoots and kills a guy. It is clearly a case of lawful self-defense.

However…

The young woman is 21 years old but did not get a concealed handgun license. In Wisconsin you can carry openly but can only conceal if you have a license. In other words, she could’ve had it in a holster on the outside of her purse or worn it in a holster attached are jeans or something similar and it would be legal. Unfortunately she stuck it inside her purse. That  is a crime in Wisconsin and even though she is lawfully in her right of self-defense the DA charges her with murder not because in self-defense was unlawful but because she illegally possess a handgun. So now this woman who actually defended her life against a sexual predator, is facing life in prison.

And…

Like Rittenhouse, she was a part of town she shouldn’t have been in. Yes it was legal and she has a right to come and go but it was not the smartest thing in the world. For that reason, let’s charge her with Murder.

Some of the same people who are complaining about Rittenhouse would  almost certainly have a different opinion. Far from being put on trial for murder, she would be seen as a roll model of a young black woman standing up for herself.  If the DA brought charges against her with the facts as I have described, there would be large protests outside of the court  room and they might turn into riots. 

How many people doubt that would be true? People from the left would be claiming that maybe she does have some charges for concealing a handgun (or maybe not even then) but you can’t translate that into murder charges. You can’t say that she did not make a wise choice in where she walked so she deserves to go to prison  for life….. yet that is exactly what some of the same people are saying about Kyle Rittenhouse.

So maybe some peoples’ opinion it was about race.

I feel like many of the people who are now happy that Kyle Rittenhouse is being charged with murder would have an exact opposite opinion if it was as my what if scenario. I also think that people who are defending Rittenhouse, would also defend this theoretical black female and not want her in prison for killing a violent sex offender and defending her own life. 

There is zero doubt that if you took all of the exact same circumstances in this case, moved them to January 6th in Washington DC,  and changed the shooter to a young black man shooting three trump supporters who were trying to hurt him, he would have 100% support from the left.  AS HE SHOULD.  Because that would be self defense, just like this case.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

There is zero doubt that if you took all of the exact same circumstances in this case, moved them to January 6th in Washington DC,  and changed the shooter to a young black man shooting three trump supporters who were trying to hurt him, he would have 100% support from the left.  AS HE SHOULD.  Because that would be self defense, just like this case.  

I always get the opinion that when a case like this comes up, some people want to know who it is and who the victim is so they can decide which way their opinion should lean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

There is zero doubt that if you took all of the exact same circumstances in this case, moved them to January 6th in Washington DC,  and changed the shooter to a young black man shooting three trump supporters who were trying to hurt him, he would have 100% support from the left.  AS HE SHOULD.  Because that would be self defense, just like this case.  

The only difference is that this shooting didn’t cross any racial borders, go figure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

I always get the opinion that when a case like this comes up, some people want to know who it is and who the victim is so they can decide which way their opinion should lean.

If you took away the videos and the circumstances (shooter, victims, race, politics, etc), and described the events as they unfolded in the most basic terms, it could go into a textbook about self-defense.  A man carrying a rifle was attacked by another man who threw an unknown object at him and then attempted to take his gun.  The man attacking the gun holder had already threatened his life earlier in the evening.  The man with the gun shot his attacker multiple times in an attempt to maintain control of his weapon.  As the shooter began trying to call for help, a mob began to chase him.  The man with the rifle ran for safety, but as he retreated he shot and killed someone who hit him in the neck with a heavy piece of wood after he'd fallen down, and shortly thereafter shot and wounded someone pointing a handgun at him.  With the threat ended, the man with the rifle quickly retreated from the area to avoid any more conflicts.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

If you took away the videos and the circumstances (shooter, victims, race, politics, etc), and described the events as they unfolded in the most basic terms, it could go into a textbook about self-defense.  A man carrying a rifle was attacked by another man who threw an unknown object at him and then attempted to take his gun.  The man attacking the gun holder had already threatened his life earlier in the evening.  The man with the gun shot his attacker multiple times in an attempt to maintain control of his weapon.  As the shooter began trying to call for help, a mob began to chase him.  The man with the rifle ran for safety, but as he retreated he shot and killed someone who hit him in the neck with a heavy piece of wood after he'd fallen down, and shortly thereafter shot and wounded someone pointing a handgun at him.  With the threat ended, the man with the rifle quickly retreated from the area to avoid any more conflicts.  

And in Wisconsin law, like Texas law, the state has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that none of that happened.

In other words, if any of your scenarios or statements  “might” have been true, then he is not guilty under law. If Rittenhouse might have had a belief that a guy was going to take his gun away and use it on him or if he might have had fear that a skateboard could’ve caused him serious injury (fear of death is not a requirement), he is not guilty. Anything that might have happened is reasonable doubt. A jury would have to come to the conclusion that none of that was reasonably possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen claims that somehow, the gun used by Rittenhouse, crossed over Illinois state lines and back to Wisconsin, or he lived in Illinois and crossed into Wisconsin, take your pick. This would be illegal. Funny how the sovereignty of state lines comes into play and should be honored, but our National border with Mexico allows drugs, sexual predators, gang members, murderers,….the list goes on….to come and go freely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, baddog said:

Kenoshans bracing for riots ahead of verdict. Who the heck is going to riot and why?

I don’t think people that riot generally need a reason why. It is more like if they can find an excuse to get together.

I have seen media like CNN and MSNBC have commentators that claim this is about race. That alone should tell you that race is used for any reason, for any excuse, for any action or any complaint.  That is not to invalidate all complaints but it’s like the boy that cried wolf. No matter what the discussion, some people can drop the R Bomb and feel the discussion ends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

I don’t think people that riot generally need a reason why. It is more like if they can find an excuse to get together.

I have seen media like CNN and MSNBC have commentators that claim this is about race. That alone should tell you that race is used for any reason, for any excuse, for any action or any complaint.  That is not to invalidate all complaints but it’s like the boy that cried wolf. No matter what the discussion, some people can drop the R Bomb and feel the discussion ends.

I’ll never figure that one out. Rittenhouse is white and he shot 3 white guys. Methinks someone has their eye on a new big screen tv, I mean, with Christmas around the corner and all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,301
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    brookelynn011
    Newest Member
    brookelynn011
    Joined

  • Posts

    • 𝗤𝘂𝗶𝗰𝗸𝗕𝗼𝗼𝗸𝘀 support agent number 𝘘𝘶𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘣𝘰𝘰𝘬𝘴 𝘖𝘯𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘚𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵 What is the number for  1[{844}]``476``5438? This is the number of quickbooks You can contact QuickBooks Online support at【1-844-476-5438】!: or 1[{844}]``476``5438. These helpline numbers are staffed by knowledgeable representatives who are equipped to address a wide range of accounting-related issues. QuickBooks Desktop Support provides a dedicated phone support (𝑪𝒂𝒍𝒍: 𝟏-𝟖𝟒𝟒-𝐈𝐍𝐓𝐔𝐈𝐓(1-844-476-5438) 𝟒𝟕6-5𝟒38 or 1-844-476-5438(𝐍𝐨 𝐖𝐚𝐢𝐭) To connect with a QuickBooks Online representative, first visit the official support website at QuickBooks Online.intuit.com. Click on the "Support" option on the top menu bar, then choose "Talk to an Expert"and call +𝟭-𝟴𝟰𝟰-𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗨𝗜𝗧-𝟰𝟳6-543𝟴 or +𝟭*𝟴𝟰𝟰*𝟰𝟳6*5438[talk to a live person at QuickBooks Online](No Wait) or "Chat with an Agent." You'll be given options to chat online or get a phone number.  Call QuickBooks Online Enterprise  Phone 𝐐𝐮𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐁𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬 representative  𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟭-𝟴𝟰𝟰-𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗨𝗜𝗧-(𝟰𝟳6*5438) or 1[{844}]``476``5438No Wait) [QuickBooks Online Enterprise Support Number] The fastest way to connect with a QuickBooks Online Enterprise  expert is by calling the dedicated 𝐐𝐮𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐁𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬 representative  𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟭-𝟴𝟰𝟰-𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗨𝗜𝗧-(𝟰𝟳6*5𝟰3𝟴) or 1[{844}]``476``5438No Wait) [QuickBooks Online Enterprise Support Number] phone number: 𝟖𝟒𝟒.𝟒𝟕6.543𝟖.  There is no need to wait on hold either, as Intuit aims to answer calls promptly during their regular business hours. For urgent after-hours issues, they also offer 24/7 phone assistance through their premium plans. Submit a Web 𝐐𝐮𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐁𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬 representative  𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟭-𝟴𝟰𝟰-𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗨𝗜𝗧-(𝟰𝟳6*5𝟰3𝟴) or 1[{844}]``476``5438No Wait) [QuickBooks Online Enterprise Support Number] Ticket If calling is not an option, you can ask your questions through a web 𝐐𝐮𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐁𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬 representative  𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟭-𝟴𝟰𝟰-𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗨𝗜𝗧-(𝟰𝟳6*5𝟰3𝟴) or 1[{844}]``476``5438No Wait) [QuickBooks Online Enterprise Support Number] ticket on the Intuit website. Navigate to the QuickBooks Online Enterprise  𝐐𝐮𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐁𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬 representative  𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟭-𝟴𝟰𝟰-𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗨𝗜𝗧-(𝟰𝟳6*5𝟰3𝟴) or 1[{844}]``476``5438No Wait) [QuickBooks Online Enterprise Support Number] page and select "Submit a ticket" to get started. Chat with Live 𝐐𝐮𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐁𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬 representative  𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟭-𝟴𝟰𝟰-𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗨𝗜𝗧-(𝟰𝟳6*5𝟰3𝟴) or 1[{844}]``476``5438No Wait) [QuickBooks Online Enterprise Support Number]  
    • Quickbooks Online Support +1-844-476-5438 Number is a notable bookkeeping program made and presented by Intuit. QuickBooks Helpline support number QuickBooks Online Help It is normally involved by small and medium-sized associations for undertakings, for example, invoicing, spending observing, and monetary reportage. QuickBooks Online Help incorporates various capabilities, for example, the capacity to follow deals, oversee stock, and layout spending plans. It is additionally viable with other business apparatuses like installment processors and web banking. Be that as it may, Quickbooks Online Help Telephone Number programming can at times glitch. If you have any issues, contact QuickBooks Online Support at +1-844-476-5438, accessible 24 hours per day, seven days per week. QuickBooks On the web, QuickBooks Independently employed, QuickBooks Ace, QuickBooks Premier, and QuickBooks Enterprises are a portion of the renditions accessible. Quickbooks Exchange Issue, inconvenience, botch, QuickBooks Online Help Application not working, Quickbooks Tokens Not Showing Settled!! Token Not Appearing, Quickbooks live specialist talk support, Quickbooks Specialized Assistance Number, Quickbooks Specialized Help Number Quickbooks Helpline Number Quickbooks Client assistance Quickbooks Client care number Quickbooks live specialist visit support Quickbooks Tokens Not Showing Settled!! Token Not Appearing in Quickbooks an email to determine Quickbooks issues: Record, Login/Administration, Instalments, and Charges. Call us at +1-844-476-5438 the organisation's QuickBooks Online Help number or the Help community for more data. The QuickBooks Contact Backing +1-844-476-5438  likewise offers its own Money Backing, however.  
    • In today's fast-paced digital world, QuickBooks has become an indispensable tool for managing finances efficiently. However, encountering technical glitches or needing assistance is not uncommon. This comprehensive guide aims to provide you with all the necessary information on how to contact QuickBooks payroll support at +1 855 838 5972, ensuring that you receive timely assistance and solutions to your queries. Understanding QuickBooks Payroll Support QuickBooks payroll support +1 855 838 5972 services are designed to assist users in resolving issues related to payroll processing, tax calculations, deductions, and other payroll-related tasks. Whether you're a small business owner or an accounting professional, having access to reliable support can make a significant difference in streamlining your payroll operations. Why QuickBooks Payroll Support Matters Having access to dedicated payroll support +1 855 838 5972 ensures that users can quickly address any issues or concerns they encounter while using the QuickBooks payroll software. From resolving software errors to providing guidance on payroll best practices, QuickBooks support specialists are equipped to handle a wide range of inquiries and technical issues. Contacting QuickBooks Payroll Support: Step-by-Step Guide Knowing how to reach QuickBooks payroll support +1 855 838 5972 can save you time and frustration when encountering issues. Follow these steps to get in touch with a QuickBooks payroll support representative: Step 1: Gather Necessary Information Before reaching out to QuickBooks payroll support +1 855 838 5972, gather relevant information such as your company information, QuickBooks product version, and details about the issue you're experiencing. Having this information readily available will expedite the troubleshooting process. Step 2: Dial QuickBooks Payroll Support Number To contact QuickBooks payroll support, dial the toll-free number +1 855 838 5972. This number will connect you with a trained support specialist who can assist you with your payroll-related inquiries. Step 3: Explain Your Issue Clearly When speaking with a QuickBooks payroll support +1 855 838 5972 representative, clearly explain the issue or query you're facing. Provide as much detail as possible to ensure that the support specialist can understand the nature of the problem and provide an appropriate solution. Step 4: Follow the Guidance Provided Once you've communicated your issue to the support representative, follow any instructions or guidance they provide. This may involve troubleshooting steps, software updates, or other actions to resolve the issue effectively. Step 5: Confirm Resolution After implementing the recommended solutions, confirm with the support +1 855 838 5972 representative that the issue has been resolved to your satisfaction. If further assistance is needed, don't hesitate to ask for additional support or clarification. FAQs About Contacting QuickBooks Payroll Support How long does it take to reach a QuickBooks payroll support representative? On average, wait times to connect with a QuickBooks payroll support representative are minimal, with most calls being answered promptly by trained specialists. Is QuickBooks payroll support available 24/7? Yes, QuickBooks payroll support is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, ensuring that users can receive assistance whenever they need it, regardless of their time zone or location. Can I contact QuickBooks payroll support via email? While phone support is the preferred method for contacting QuickBooks payroll support, users can also reach out via email for non-urgent inquiries or technical support. Are there any fees for contacting QuickBooks payroll support? No, QuickBooks payroll support is provided free of charge to users who are subscribed to a QuickBooks payroll plan or product. What languages are supported by QuickBooks payroll support? QuickBooks payroll support is available in multiple languages, ensuring that users from diverse linguistic backgrounds can receive assistance in their preferred language. Can I schedule a callback from QuickBooks payroll support? Yes, users have the option to schedule a callback from QuickBooks payroll support at a time that is convenient for them, eliminating the need to wait on hold. Conclusion Contacting QuickBooks payroll support at +1 855 838 5972 is a straightforward process that ensures users receive timely assistance and solutions to their payroll-related queries. By following the step-by-step guide outlined in this article and leveraging the expertise of QuickBooks support specialists, users can effectively resolve any issues they encounter and optimize their payroll operations for maximum efficiency and accuracy.
    • current standings after 3/28 games  First Round of District Complete  1. Orangefield 6-1 2. hardin 5-2 3. kirbyville 4-3 3. anahuac 4-3 3. Buna 4-3 6. Kountze 3-4  7. warren 2-5 8. East chambers 0-7 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...