Jump to content

Barbers Hill 66 Nederland 28/Final


AggiesAreWe

Recommended Posts

  • bullets13 changed the title to Barbers Hill 66 Nederland 28/Final
2 minutes ago, spidersal said:

for all you folks that keep saying Nederland’s Oline and defense is good, shame on you for telling a tale. Simply put they are BAD!  Crosby may score 80 on the Dogs

The O-line was banged up and missing Bieber.  The best lineman we have.  But yes.  We suck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, #COUGAR08 said:

After seeing Dayton hold off TC like they did tonight, I don't see PNG having trouble with them. 

Man, IDK? Depending on which BH team shows up I can see them not having trouble with TC but I don’t think that’s the case for PNG? TC’s defense is legit and that PNG offense I saw last night would have trouble breaking double digits on it IMO. BH can win out and finish 2nd if TC beats PNG for them next week. The crazy part is that the draw to get to the 3rd round is probably easier if you finish 3rd this year. You would draw Montgomery instead of Texas High in the second round🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BHFAN said:

BH D looked a little better tonight. Tighten that up before the playoffs and BH could make some noise. Goodluck to Ned I know it’s not the year you were expecting, finish strong.

I think it’s more of Ned’s offense, remember TC shut them out. I think y’all’s defense is probably going to look good against TC too but it’s really because their offense is basic.
 

On another note, thank you to The Hill for handling your business last night!!!
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cougar14.2 said:

I think it’s more of Ned’s offense, remember TC shut them out. I think y’all’s defense is probably going to look good against TC too but it’s really because their offense is basic.
 

On another note, thank you to The Hill for handling your business last night!!!
 

 

Congrats to the Coogs! Undisputed District Champions. No one will touch yall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Cougar14.2 said:

Man, IDK? Depending on which BH team shows up I can see them not having trouble with TC but I don’t think that’s the case for PNG? TC’s defense is legit and that PNG offense I saw last night would have trouble breaking double digits on it IMO. BH can win out and finish 2nd if TC beats PNG for them next week. The crazy part is that the draw to get to the 3rd round is probably easier if you finish 3rd this year. You would draw Montgomery instead of Texas High in the second round🤔

Montgomery is legit this year don't sleep on them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BHFAN said:

Congrats to the Coogs! Undisputed District Champions. No one will touch yall

Not going to lie. @Barbers Hill, @PNG and @Nederland all in one year. I would’ve never predicted it but I had us down for an L in one of those games and co-champs with y’all or Ned. Very proud of this young team. BH keeps playing like y’all did last night and you might have a chance against Texas High. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Separation Scientist said:

How do the tiebreaking scenarios work for 2nd thru 4th? Point differentials?   

Smh, used to be a WOSGrad question😢 I’m pretty sure it does though, which is why I said TC needs to beat PNG for y’all and take the -14 BH would have out of play. I’m not sure if we cap out at +17 or +21 for an individual game for the first tie-breaker though? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Cougar14.2 said:

Smh, used to be a WOSGrad question😢 I’m pretty sure it does though, which is why I said TC needs to beat PNG for y’all and take the -14 BH would have out of play. I’m not sure if we cap out at +17 or +21 for an individual game for the first tie-breaker though? 

cap is 21 I believe.   Ned still has a chance at 4th if TC beats PNG due to head to head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...