Jump to content

Barbers Hill 66 Nederland 28/Final


AggiesAreWe

Recommended Posts

  • bullets13 changed the title to Barbers Hill 66 Nederland 28/Final
2 minutes ago, spidersal said:

for all you folks that keep saying Nederland’s Oline and defense is good, shame on you for telling a tale. Simply put they are BAD!  Crosby may score 80 on the Dogs

The O-line was banged up and missing Bieber.  The best lineman we have.  But yes.  We suck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, #COUGAR08 said:

After seeing Dayton hold off TC like they did tonight, I don't see PNG having trouble with them. 

Man, IDK? Depending on which BH team shows up I can see them not having trouble with TC but I don’t think that’s the case for PNG? TC’s defense is legit and that PNG offense I saw last night would have trouble breaking double digits on it IMO. BH can win out and finish 2nd if TC beats PNG for them next week. The crazy part is that the draw to get to the 3rd round is probably easier if you finish 3rd this year. You would draw Montgomery instead of Texas High in the second round🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BHFAN said:

BH D looked a little better tonight. Tighten that up before the playoffs and BH could make some noise. Goodluck to Ned I know it’s not the year you were expecting, finish strong.

I think it’s more of Ned’s offense, remember TC shut them out. I think y’all’s defense is probably going to look good against TC too but it’s really because their offense is basic.
 

On another note, thank you to The Hill for handling your business last night!!!
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cougar14.2 said:

I think it’s more of Ned’s offense, remember TC shut them out. I think y’all’s defense is probably going to look good against TC too but it’s really because their offense is basic.
 

On another note, thank you to The Hill for handling your business last night!!!
 

 

Congrats to the Coogs! Undisputed District Champions. No one will touch yall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Cougar14.2 said:

Man, IDK? Depending on which BH team shows up I can see them not having trouble with TC but I don’t think that’s the case for PNG? TC’s defense is legit and that PNG offense I saw last night would have trouble breaking double digits on it IMO. BH can win out and finish 2nd if TC beats PNG for them next week. The crazy part is that the draw to get to the 3rd round is probably easier if you finish 3rd this year. You would draw Montgomery instead of Texas High in the second round🤔

Montgomery is legit this year don't sleep on them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BHFAN said:

Congrats to the Coogs! Undisputed District Champions. No one will touch yall

Not going to lie. @Barbers Hill, @PNG and @Nederland all in one year. I would’ve never predicted it but I had us down for an L in one of those games and co-champs with y’all or Ned. Very proud of this young team. BH keeps playing like y’all did last night and you might have a chance against Texas High. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Separation Scientist said:

How do the tiebreaking scenarios work for 2nd thru 4th? Point differentials?   

Smh, used to be a WOSGrad question😢 I’m pretty sure it does though, which is why I said TC needs to beat PNG for y’all and take the -14 BH would have out of play. I’m not sure if we cap out at +17 or +21 for an individual game for the first tie-breaker though? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Cougar14.2 said:

Smh, used to be a WOSGrad question😢 I’m pretty sure it does though, which is why I said TC needs to beat PNG for y’all and take the -14 BH would have out of play. I’m not sure if we cap out at +17 or +21 for an individual game for the first tie-breaker though? 

cap is 21 I believe.   Ned still has a chance at 4th if TC beats PNG due to head to head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Wrong again. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   The day that Trump took office, our nation debt stood at 19.9 Trillion dollars (End of Q4, 2016).  After his tax cuts (without corresponding cuts in spending), the national debt stood at 23.2 Trillion dollars at the end of Q1 of 2020 that was the Start of COVID, FYI... Or a total increase in debt of almost 17% during Trump's first three years (and one quarter) in office.  At the end of his reign (with COVID spending for which Trump himself signed off on) was at 27.7 Trillion Dollars.  That's a 39% increase in the National Debt while Trump was in office.  For further reference, Biden inherited a 27.7 Trillion dollar debt to start.  At the end of Q4 2023, the debt stands at 34 Trillion.  That's an increase of 19% over the first three years. I know that math and facts hurt your feelings, but Trump was horrible for the country before he allowed "them Dirty Democrats to shut down the economy."  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the country" doesn't know the first thing about micro/macro economics or the effects of deficit spending.  Trump hurt us like no other president, period.  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the economy" is actually stating for the rest of us with some sense "I don't know what I'm talking about."
    • But of course you wouldn’t understand the saying. You’re so clever. Your education precedes you. 
    • Hmmmm..... Didn't they just win a football state championship?
    • The fact that you try to bolster your assertion that Trump was a bad president by using "facts" that are not attributable to him is disinformation at it's worse. It is "lying by omission", which is just another way to say big ol' fat lie. Unemployment was going down to record lows before Covid hit. You and I and almost everyone on Earth knows this, but somehow you try to spin this stat as a knock on Trump. Same for the stock market. LYING BY OMISSION. A tactic almost as old as prostitution. The debt and spending exploding due to Trump is just an old fashioned bald face lie. You seem to follow the mantra "if you tell a lie enough times it becomes fact." You are starting to resemble Biden now. Do you have any other whoppers to share?  
    • Intentionally keeping top secret documents haphazardly around the house comes to mind.  A lot of what came out of his mouth, torpedoing the political careers of republicans who didn’t fall in line?  I don’t know that he all of a sudden became a beacon of moral light and goodness just because he got into office. Again, we’re not talking about policy, but what kind of person he is.  If anything he seemed to get worse once he was in power as far as I could see.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...