Jump to content

SILSBEE 36 HAMSHIRE-FANNETT 35/Final


AggiesAreWe

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, AggiesAreWe said:

I would like to see the completion % at least 55% and much less INT's

I agree as well or even 60%. I've seen 3 or 4 games on Texan Live. He was very accurate the 1st 2 or 3 games but I know there were a few bad weather games here and there. Id like to see him run as well. He has good speed. That could really open up the passing game IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, BADSANTA said:

Miller should be on the All-State team this year. Dodd and a few guys on defense should get votes as well. Let's go beat Hardin Jefferson and lock up 3rd. Silsbee has thr ability to go 2 or 3 rounds for sure. 

Locking up third gives you Sealy in Bi district and China Spring in the second round. Sealy is getting their players back and will be tough in round 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, aTmfan06 said:

A lot of Silsbee ppl were saying they weren’t that great this year… or this team is just young. Now they barely beat H-F and they are headed 3 rounds deep lol cmon man 

I watched a young Silsbee team go to the  state semifinals in 2017 with sophomores and juniors. Got hot the last few weeks and rolled. Had a sophomore QB as well back then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, aTmfan06 said:

A lot of Silsbee ppl were saying they weren’t that great this year… or this team is just young. Now they barely beat H-F and they are headed 3 rounds deep lol cmon man 

That sounds like Silsbee fans every year.  Lol.  
Got me a screen shot… just in case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BADSANTA said:

What is the top 2 alltime single season receiving records for Silsbee? I'm going to guess the 2 guys would be Desmond Doss and Mackey are the top 2. 

I don't have the all time records but from my limited memory (2000-2021)....

Miller may not only set the single season receiving record for Silsbee this year but could in fact eclipse career records for Silsbee receivers in his first season.

The closest I know of stats wise to D. Miller this year is K. Barnes (2016-17) and Miller has blown those numbers out the water before the playoffs.

I'd have to defer to more seasoned people to clear this up but if the pace continues then no doubt he will be all time leader at Silsbee, if he stays at receiver, by the time he graduates.

Jmo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Silsbee92 said:

I don't have the all time records but from my limited memory (2000-2021)....

Miller may not only set the single season receiving record for Silsbee this year but could in fact eclipse career records for Silsbee receivers in his first season.

The closest I know of stats wise to D. Miller this year is K. Barnes (2016-17) and Miller has blown those numbers out the water before the playoffs.

I'd have to defer to more seasoned people to clear this up but if the pace continues then no doubt he will be all time leader at Silsbee, if he stays at receiver, by the time he graduates.

Jmo

Mackey has the single season receptions, yards and TD record for Silsbee.

Career receiving yards goes to Barnes.

Miller is on pace to break all those records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Englebert said:

If Orangefield beats HF or looses by one point, Orangefield will be runner-up, Silsbee will be third, and HF will be fourth. If HF beats Orangefield by two or more points, HF will be runner-up, Orangefield will be third, and Silsbee will be fourth. (Barring any upsets.)

was told if HF wins by 4 or more , OF moves to 4th, HF 2nd, Silsbee 3d. So if your Silsbee fan, you want OF to win, or HF to win by 4 or more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, aTmfan06 said:

A lot of Silsbee ppl were saying they weren’t that great this year… or this team is just young. Now they barely beat H-F and they are headed 3 rounds deep lol cmon man 

For real, the HJ game is gonna be close and a struggle ? Tigers have some issues at running back right now. That said, depending on the OF HJ game outcome, and Silsbee taking the 3d place slot, it would not be a far reach for Silsbee to get a rematch with Carthage in 3d round. After bi week, get Dodd back healthy, and with getting the passes to Miller, good field conditions, and decent refs, it's not out of the possibility? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JaspD55 said:

For real, the HJ game is gonna be close and a struggle ? Tigers have some issues at running back right now. That said, depending on the OF HJ game outcome, and Silsbee taking the 3d place slot, it would not be a far reach for Silsbee to get a rematch with Carthage in 3d round. After bi week, get Dodd back healthy, and with getting the passes to Miller, good field conditions, and decent refs, it's not out of the possibility? 

sorry I meant the OF HF game outcome

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, JaspD55 said:

was told if HF wins by 4 or more , OF moves to 4th, HF 2nd, Silsbee 3d. So if your Silsbee fan, you want OF to win, or HF to win by 4 or more

Correct.

Current point totals are:

Silsbee -1 (lost by 2 to OF, won by 1 to HF)

Orangefield +2 (won by 2 over Silsbee)

HF -1 (lost by 1 to Silsbee)

 

Assuming Silsbee beats HJ next week and OF and HF win their respective games in week 11, then it comes down to what happens in the game between OF & HF next week. An Orangefield win gets them #2, Silsbee #3 and HF #4. An HF win by 1 point will result in OF getting 2nd, HF 3rd, Silsbee 4th. An HF win by 2 or 3 points will result in HF getting 2nd, OF getting 3rd, Silsbee 4th. An HF win by 4 or more will put HF #2, Silsbee #3 and OF #4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Correct.

Current point totals are:

Silsbee -1 (lost by 2 to OF, won by 1 to HF)

Orangefield +2 (won by 2 over Silsbee)

HF -1 (lost by 1 to Silsbee)

 

Assuming Silsbee beats HJ next week and OF and HF win their respective games in week 11, then it comes down to what happens in the game between OF & HF next week. An Orangefield win gets them #2, Silsbee #3 and HF #4. An HF win by 1 point will result in OF getting 2nd, HF 3rd, Silsbee 4th. An HF win by 2 or 3 points will result in HF getting 2nd, OF getting 3rd, Silsbee 4th. An HF win by 4 or more will put HF #2, Silsbee #3 and OF #4.

If I'm not mistaken, the way our district works is that in a three way tie, point differential is used to determine the first team in (2nd seed). Head-to-head then determines the other two seeds (3rd and 4th seeds). If that is the case, a HF win by 2 or more will put HF 2nd (point differential), Orangefield 3rd and Silsbee 4th (Head-to-head). If anyone has the district charter please verify.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Englebert said:

If I'm not mistaken, the way our district works is that in a three way tie, point differential is used to determine the first team in (2nd seed). Head-to-head then determines the other seeds (3rd and 4th seeds). If that is the case, a HF win by 2 or more will put HF 2nd (point differential), Orangefield 3rd and Silsbee 4th (Head-to-head). If anyone has the district charter please verify.

I'll see if I can find out, I knew that if HF won by 3 pts, Silsbee and OF would be tied at -1, and head to head would come in to play , and OF would move to 3d, and Silsbee 4th. Be interesting either way, amazing that its come to this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JaspD55 said:

I'll see if I can find out, I knew that if HF won by 3 pts, Silsbee and OF would be tied at -1, and head to head would come in to play , and OF would move to 3d, and Silsbee 4th. Be interesting either way, amazing that its come to this?

Each district determines their own tie-breaking rules. Some use point differential for each seed, some use the system I described. I haven't looked at the tie-breaking rules in a few years, so I'm not sure which one District 11 uses. Please let us know if you find out. I will see if I can dig up something also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...