Jump to content

Nederland Bulldogs at Dayton Broncos


lcm93

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Reagan said:

I think TC's defense had a lot to do with it.

Yep. 

TC’s defensive line control the game, period. 

Changing the running back would not have mattered. You still have to have a lane to run through. A different runner might have gotten a few more yards but would  not have been a game changer.

Nederland came into the game probably averaging over 300 yards a game. Their offensive line simply did not match up with Texas City.

After the rain shortened WOS game they are averaging 38 in the 4 game before TC. Even with the defensive shutout by TC, Nederland is still averaging 30 points a game in the last five games.

I’m not sure why some people have a hard time saying  that we just ran into a tougher team on that night and move on.

I never predict high school football games. For all I know a Dayton might win 68-0 but I wouldn’t take much from the Texas City game. In their last five games they’ve given up 10 points on defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Dayton pulls this one out at home. Broncos will be playing with nothing to lose in hopes of keeping their season alive and Ned will be on the road in what’s basically a must win situation. Dayton is coming off a confidence builder while Ned is coming off a game in which they were shut out offensively. 
 

We can point to the TC defense  it they’ve given up more points to other teams on their schedule and none of them are over .500. I think Dayton scores enough to take advantage of the issues Ned is having on offense and gets their biggest district win since they beat New Caney in ‘15. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Bigdog changed the title to Nederland Bulldogs at Dayton Broncos

If Nederland loses to Dayton they have some big problems.  Did not not match up with TC at all.  Long road trip.  Off game.  Who the heck knows.  Good luck Crosby you will need it.  TC is for real.  Monty will be prepared for Dayton.  Big Ned squeeks by.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nederland played good defense against Austin, Santa Fe, and Texas City.  They did not play good defense against Silsbee or PNG.  Hopefully they will put all things together against Dayton.  If they lose this one, unfortunately they will wind up 6-4 and sitting at the house come playoff time.

Dogs, put it together this week!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, spidersal said:

Nederland played good defense against Austin, Santa Fe, and Texas City.  They did not play good defense against Silsbee or PNG.  Hopefully they will put all things together against Dayton.  If they lose this one, unfortunately they will wind up 6-4 and sitting at the house come playoff time.

Dogs, put it together this week!

First half against PNG for sure, only gave up 7 in the 2nd half....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, spidersal said:

Nederland played good defense against Austin, Santa Fe, and Texas City.  They did not play good defense against Silsbee or PNG.  Hopefully they will put all things together against Dayton.  If they lose this one, unfortunately they will wind up 6-4 and sitting at the house come playoff time.

Dogs, put it together this week!

And WOS……

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...