Jump to content

WO-S at Orangefield


Recommended Posts

Friday night the mustangs just cant say here we are and smiling  as they get off the bus if this happens they need a  adjustment witch  orange fied will give them that's. how  good they are this year the BOBCATS ARE THE REAL DEAL they are a very balance ball club this year ok now the only thing to mare this game will be the very soft field because  50% rain is called for by kfdm in the after noon 30% at night this will hurt the passing routs in this game . on a closing note hang onto your hats that's maybe how close it will be-----GO AWAY RAIN  DONT NEED SLIPING AND SLIDING .

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, raideroldtimer said:

This one is hard to call. I'm leaning towards WOS but if any team in their district can take them this year it may just be Orangefield.

they are for reel wo-s has not really not been playin that good this year no one can really put a finger on why. They got people in law law land  by the play calling because for some reason  the mustangs has a ton of talent at WRs speed to burn and 5 STAR RBs with outstanding speed and they DONT USE ALL THE  WEPIONS  WHEN THEY HAVE THE CHANCE  ITS CALLED P O O R PLAY CALLING SOMEONE BETTER WAKE UP MONDAY and don't use there poor playing to coast the mustangs a possible dist. win again  POOR play calling

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, powerlifter said:

they are for reel wo-s has not really not been playin that good this year no one can really put a finger on why. They got people in law law land  by the play calling because for some reason  the mustangs has a ton of talent at WRs speed to burn and 5 STAR RBs with outstanding speed and they DONT USE ALL THE  WEPIONS  WHEN THEY HAVE THE CHANCE  ITS CALLED P O O R PLAY CALLING SOMEONE BETTER WAKE UP MONDAY and don't use there poor playing to coast the mustangs a possible dist. win again  POOR play calling

Your talking about the same guy that called plays in 4 state championships right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LCMAlumtiger32 said:

Your talking about the same guy that called plays in 4 state championships right? 

 lol smiles yes nice guy  i know him and he knows me i know the familey but the play book stinks it has on the cover beware of this playbook XXX i have one play here we ran in  New Orleans ran it 31 times 20 TD had a 225  RB who totaled yardage 300 plus yards no one wanted to tackle the Train

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, powerlifter said:

 lol smiles yes nice guy  i know him and he knows me i know the familey but the play book stinks it has on the cover beware of this playbook XXX i have one play here we ran in  New Orleans ran it 31 times 20 TD had a 225  RB who totaled yardage 300 plus yards no one wanted to tackle the Train

only ran it on muddy fields can you picture it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, powerlifter said:

 lol smiles yes nice guy  i know him and he knows me i know the familey but the play book stinks it has on the cover beware of this playbook XXX i have one play here we ran in  New Orleans ran it 31 times 20 TD had a 225  RB who totaled yardage 300 plus yards no one wanted to tackle the Train

I agree the the playbook is old and not creative. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GUNHO said:

Wos has a explosive running game and that's it at this point.You go with what you have.Play calling is limited under these conditions.

if the big linemen that OF has can stop the speed of the mustangs RB so be it just pulled up the teams  OF has played so far  maybe OF could stay close with Nederland  LC-M  Newton

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hum.. I wonder if this is why we haven't been advancing in the playoffs more often, doing the same old thing. Teams have scouted for years. Thinking outside the box is creativity.  That don't fix it if it broke is old too, its time to show something different. You never know what you have on the sidelines who can make a contribution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ladybug33 said:

Hum.. I wonder if this is why we haven't been advancing in the playoffs more often, doing the same old thing. Teams have scouted for years. Thinking outside the box is creativity.  That don't fix it if it broke is old too, its time to show something different. You never know what you have on the sidelines who can make a contribution.

What.You make it sound like we exit the playoffs early each year.I don't think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GUNHO said:

What.You make it sound like we exit the playoffs early each year.I don't think so.

We always have higher standards right. 3 or 4 rounds is good, but, we strive to do better at WOS. I don't care about the expectations of others schools who may be happy to get that far or get in the playoffs. We have higher standards. I guess it ok for some, but championships are always within reach, if only we adjust our play calling as we move further in the playoff that's all I'm saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...