Jump to content

WOS VS SILSBEE Showdown


Stangfan#1

WOS vs SILSBEE   

62 members have voted

  1. 1. Who y'all got let's start it

    • WOS
      50
    • SILSBEE
      12


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, ladybug33 said:

Do you think Zig will be back at QB now that #17 is getting the start now? 

Yes. He was only out this past week.if we just do the small things like short passes and play action.and stop all the dumb penalties on defense.lol,the defense average more penalties than the offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, powerlifter said:

the word Silsbee around west orange leves a better  smell around the coaches corner at mustang land. the tigers have been a pain in the wrong end the coaches still remember the freezing  windy night that the tiger coach said no  we will play it tonight now on a close becouse if there tigers haft to play in it so dose west orange stark.now on a closeing note  IF west orange stark comes out and playes like we know thay can then mybe Silsbee  MIGHT HAVE A PROBLEM  lets see if there is some chain gang left. two things that are still MISSING FROM THE FIELD OF DREAMS IS gang  pursuit and RIPPING at the ball  not seen it as yet. 

download (42).jpg

images (29).jpg

download (21).jpg

Please tell me, I'm not the only one..??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, powerlifter said:

might be looking at this

 he can also play QB-WR- PUNT RETURNER THE, VERY YOUNG QB is going a good job on reading other teams defenses that is a plus  for the youngster   are maybe Thompson might rest him  put him as needed west orange stark is gifted with one of the largest OL  they  have seen in years. they  sure hard to be pushed around they can get mean as we have seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dj said:

Yes. He was only out this past week.if we just do the small things like short passes and play action.and stop all the dumb penalties on defense.lol,the defense average more penalties than the offense.

Yes that's been noticeable lately. We can't make those kinds of mistakes Friday night. Hopefully this game will be broadcast since it's pink out night. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, powerlifter said:

 this will be a good game to watch, Silsbee is not that bad of a football team if you look at how many points they have put in this year they can move the ball. one thing they lacking is a defense.

They are 4th in points for and 5th in points against in our district.I know who you have played has a lot to do with these kind of stats but Silsbee is good at shooting themselves in the foot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • Actually I wasn’t responding to your comment. It was funny. I was using your comment to take issue with baddog’s comparison. 😎
    • I mean the baseball kids aren’t even doing football after school, they go to baseball… baseball kids get about a hour during the period. 
    • That is yet to be determined in trial. ”Taking” in the Fifth Amendment doesn’t mean ownership, title changing hands, etc. A government can “take” your property without “taking” your properties.  That has been true.  This issue is, did Texas take the property under the Fifth Amendment and subsequent Supreme Court rulings and not the dictionary definition of “taking”. As always in the law, definitions matter. 
    • Wrong again. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   The day that Trump took office, our nation debt stood at 19.9 Trillion dollars (End of Q4, 2016).  After his tax cuts (without corresponding cuts in spending), the national debt stood at 23.2 Trillion dollars at the end of Q1 of 2020 that was the Start of COVID, FYI... Or a total increase in debt of almost 17% during Trump's first three years (and one quarter) in office.  At the end of his reign (with COVID spending for which Trump himself signed off on) was at 27.7 Trillion Dollars.  That's a 39% increase in the National Debt while Trump was in office.  For further reference, Biden inherited a 27.7 Trillion dollar debt to start.  At the end of Q4 2023, the debt stands at 34 Trillion.  That's an increase of 19% over the first three years. I know that math and facts hurt your feelings, but Trump was horrible for the country before he allowed "them Dirty Democrats to shut down the economy."  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the country" doesn't know the first thing about micro/macro economics or the effects of deficit spending.  Trump hurt us like no other president, period.  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the economy" is actually stating for the rest of us with some sense "I don't know what I'm talking about."
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...