Jump to content

Hull-Daisetta vs West Hardin


JohnRuthDomergue

Recommended Posts

West Hardin actually looks improved from last year, they can throw the ball, the QB is a good player, starting RB is a big back, tough and athletic, they like to spread you out. #8 and #24 for WH are players! HD's defensive coordinator will hardly ever call a blitz, when teams spread HD out, he likes to match up... When a team spreads you out with 4 wides, there is nobody to protect the QB,  bring the heat. HD has a huge o-line, they need lots of sledge work. If HD plays like the last 2 ball games, WH wins by 12. WH's #8 is an athlete, #24 is a bull, HD may have their hands full. HD will have to pressure this QB, he can throw. HD's CB Jeremiah Loften would be a good match up for WH WR #8. We will see if HD can bounce back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

West Hardin is in no way an “improved” team over last year by alot and I’m not even trying to be ugly by saying that! They are exactly what they are and that’s a team that’s down trying to build back up . I’m just going to be honest last years team (the 15 kids they had) would give this years team a fit! They do throw the ball a little more but a team with good db’s will have a field day when they do. With that being said They do have a couple play makers like normal but the team as a whole is still really young and inexperienced, also from what I’ve herd is #24 is out with a broke collar bone and that will hurt their run game if that’s true. If HD plays bad like y’all said they have been then it might be a tight game but if HD even shows up and trys then they will run away with it! HD wins either way by a little or by a lot which ever is up to them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, SETX32 said:

West Hardin is in no way an “improved” team over last year by alot and I’m not even trying to be ugly by saying that! They are exactly what they are and that’s a team that’s down trying to build back up . I’m just going to be honest last years team (the 15 kids they had) would give this years team a fit! They do throw the ball a little more but a team with good db’s will have a field day when they do. With that being said They do have a couple play makers like normal but the team as a whole is still really young and inexperienced, also from what I’ve herd is #24 is out with a broke collar bone and that will hurt their run game if that’s true. If HD plays bad like y’all said they have been then it might be a tight game but if HD even shows up and trys then they will run away with it! HD wins either way by a little or by a lot which ever is up to them

QB Sellers will return next week vs Houston Kipp, he has been injured all year. Sellers can throw and run, good dual threat. The most alarming thing about the HD team and staff this year, is definitely the effort/details not being there it seems. I have yet to see any coaches on the sideline, proactively going over to a player or players, and coaching them during a game, it's non existent, is it just me or do most coaches get involved with correcting a bad technique or just talk with players, mine did when I played, I got grabbed by the face mask a few times by a coach and talked with. The players and coaches just have not been fired up, very little emotion shown. Also, the little things every week, o-line not firing out together and fumbles all the time... I think HD when healthy, will be in contention for the District title, but man does it look and feel different right now, maybe a win vs your 100 year rival helps the culture, winning cures everything. Yes, HD has played 3A teams, yes lots of injuries and sick kids, out scored like 74 to 6 in last two games, offense averaging 3 points a game... I look for TE Drake and WR Anders to be big targets for QB Sellers in the passing game, when he returns vs Kipp, with Dawson Victorian and Jerimiah Loften featured in the backfield, HD will be a good balanced team. HD probably would be most potent with running Anders and Drake both at TE together (double tight). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The decision to ever start the current backup QB, says a ton about our coaches... It's like we are playing 10 vs 11 on the field, no brainer to put one of your top athletes at QB until Sellers returns, heck there is literally Anders, Dawson, Tyler Thib, Isaac Garcia or Drake that would be decent at temp QB. Is there issues with the remaining staff and Birdwell, fans are not seeing any interactions on the sidelines?... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JohnRuthDomergue said:

QB Sellers will return next week vs Houston Kipp, he has been injured all year. Sellers can throw and run, good dual threat. The most alarming thing about the HD team and staff this year, is definitely the effort/details not being there it seems. I have yet to see any coaches on the sideline, proactively going over to a player or players, and coaching them during a game, it's non existent, is it just me or do most coaches get involved with correcting a bad technique or just talk with players, mine did when I played, I got grabbed by the face mask a few times by a coach and talked with. The players and coaches just have not been fired up, very little emotion shown. Also, the little things every week, o-line not firing out together and fumbles all the time... I think HD when healthy, will be in contention for the District title, but man does it look and feel different right now, maybe a win vs your 100 year rival helps the culture, winning cures everything. Yes, HD has played 3A teams, yes lots of injuries and sick kids, out scored like 74 to 6 in last two games, offense averaging 3 points a game... I look for TE Drake and WR Anders to be big targets for QB Sellers in the passing game, when he returns vs Kipp, with Dawson Victorian and Jerimiah Loften featured in the backfield, HD will be a good balanced team. HD probably would be most potent with running Anders and Drake both at TE together (double tight). 

If the players are as much of "know-it-alls" as the posters/fans on this site.. or as sensitive.. then that would probably cause a mass exodus.  Perhaps the coaches know that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,883
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    paaro21
    Newest Member
    paaro21
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Really good hire! As I stated previously on this thread, Mike T has been an essential part of WB’s success the last few years & is a student of the game & I have a ton of respect for how he goes about things as a coach. Big on teaching kids how to do things the right way to prepare them for not only basketball but the game of life. He’ll be fine there, my only question is what kind of talent does WB have returning?  Best thing about this situation for Mike T is WB will be 5A for at least the next 2 years, so he should win a lot of games & have some deep playoff runs.
    • So which coaches kid gets the QB job? Trotter or Barrier
    • A Winnie land owner (and others) sued the State of Texas after they built IH-10 a few feet higher in order to help contain storm flooding. Sure enough a hurricane hit and flooded the land. The storm improvements worked!! Unfortunately the state sacrificed several people’s properties in using the interstate highway as a dam.  Richard DeVillier tried to sue Texas under our laws and Constitution and the US Constitution under the Fifth Amendment “taking clause” (eminent domain). After a favorable ruling in the federal district court on the right to sue Texas directly, the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans overturned that ruling and said that the DeVlier had no authority to sue Texas directly.  On Tuesday a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled that DeVillier and others had the right to sue Texas directly under Texas law and under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. The case is now sent back down to the lower court. DeVillier and others have not won their lawsuits as the case has not been decided on its merits at a trial. He still has to go to prove his case. What they did win was a unanimous Supreme Court agreeing that he has the right to bring Texas to trial for taking his property with just compensation.   
    • Don't jump?!  What?!
    • @Big girl  @UT alum     Amazing, isn't it?!  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...