Jump to content

Beaumont West Brook 18 Houston Lamar 42/FINAL


AggiesAreWe

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

So, @wbfanyou grow quite quiet in the week of the woodshed beating.  I expected you to be just as talkative as you were a few weeks ago. What happened?  Also, what’s you’re thoughts on the strong possibility of y’all missing the playoffs?  
 

Remember I told you to keep that same energy…

Brook will get the 4th spot at worst. They actually win games on that side of town.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wbfan said:

Brook will get the 4th spot at worst. They actually win games on that side of town.

I see this post don’t have that same energy and fire from a few weeks ago. What happened?  And how do you get 4th if you lose to NS, King, ‘Cita, AND SC?  Can I expect you to be here after each one of those games (same energy of course)…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/14/2021 at 11:28 AM, BMTSoulja1 said:

So, @wbfanyou grow quite quiet in the week of the woodshed beating.  I expected you to be just as talkative as you were a few weeks ago. What happened?  Also, what’s you’re thoughts on the strong possibility of y’all missing the playoffs?  
 

Remember I told you to keep that same energy…

West Brook will not miss the playoffs! They’ll adjust to not having Bryce around and get hot at the right time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Atascocita and North Shore are for sure.

Let's look at CEK, SC, and WB

CEK looks to be the strongest out of the 3 with quality win over Ridge Point, Strake Jesuit isn't the same team as years past( Their only win was over Spring Dekaney). Summer Creek beat winless Friendswood, winless Spring Dekaney, and a below average Conroe. West Brook beat terrible United, below average Tomball Memorial, and then lost an all world QB and got strummed by Houston Lamar. Houston Lamar two losses are to The Woodlands and George Ranch (Average teams). I think West Brook pulls it out and makes the playoffs by splitting with Summer Creek and CEK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Yeoj said:

Yeah but that AD was trying to give the job to a different coach. The WB principal "convinced" that AD to go in the direction that he did. 

Curious: Is this current AD one in the same that passed on Langston when he applied for the Ozen and United Head job  if I'm correct.

I do know Langston has applied more than once For the Head job with Bisd, Including applying at Westbrook previously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

I see this post don’t have that same energy and fire from a few weeks ago. What happened?  And how do you get 4th if you lose to NS, King, ‘Cita, AND SC?  Can I expect you to be here after each one of those games (same energy of course)…

I got NS, Cita, SC, then 4th up for grabs between King and WB. Bigger question is: Will your Timberpups play us for the district title or will the Timberpups have to win their last district game just to make the playoffs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JustUs said:

Curious: Is this current AD one in the same that passed on Langston when he applied for the Ozen and United Head job  if I'm correct.

I do know Langston has applied more than once For the Head job with Bisd, Including applying at Westbrook previously.

Well, no.  Jackson was moved to principal of United during that hire.  There was another AD that held that title for 1 year..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, JustUs said:

Curious: Is this current AD one in the same that passed on Langston when he applied for the Ozen and United Head job  if I'm correct.

I do know Langston has applied more than once For the Head job with Bisd, Including applying at Westbrook previously.

YES! He hired coach Louis after trying to sneak coach Taylor in as HC. Then he hire coach Graham.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • Actually I wasn’t responding to your comment. It was funny. I was using your comment to take issue with baddog’s comparison. 😎
    • I mean the baseball kids aren’t even doing football after school, they go to baseball… baseball kids get about a hour during the period. 
    • That is yet to be determined in trial. ”Taking” in the Fifth Amendment doesn’t mean ownership, title changing hands, etc. A government can “take” your property without “taking” your properties.  That has been true.  This issue is, did Texas take the property under the Fifth Amendment and subsequent Supreme Court rulings and not the dictionary definition of “taking”. As always in the law, definitions matter. 
    • Wrong again. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   The day that Trump took office, our nation debt stood at 19.9 Trillion dollars (End of Q4, 2016).  After his tax cuts (without corresponding cuts in spending), the national debt stood at 23.2 Trillion dollars at the end of Q1 of 2020 that was the Start of COVID, FYI... Or a total increase in debt of almost 17% during Trump's first three years (and one quarter) in office.  At the end of his reign (with COVID spending for which Trump himself signed off on) was at 27.7 Trillion Dollars.  That's a 39% increase in the National Debt while Trump was in office.  For further reference, Biden inherited a 27.7 Trillion dollar debt to start.  At the end of Q4 2023, the debt stands at 34 Trillion.  That's an increase of 19% over the first three years. I know that math and facts hurt your feelings, but Trump was horrible for the country before he allowed "them Dirty Democrats to shut down the economy."  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the country" doesn't know the first thing about micro/macro economics or the effects of deficit spending.  Trump hurt us like no other president, period.  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the economy" is actually stating for the rest of us with some sense "I don't know what I'm talking about."
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...