Jump to content

Livingston @ Orangefield


BOBKAT'88

Recommended Posts

On 9/8/2021 at 1:34 PM, Bobcat22 said:

Throwing doesn’t need to be a threat when they can hold the ball for a whole quarter.

The most import stat is what's on the scoreboard after 48 minutes. 

Smalley should have kicked the extra point last year. He would have won in overtime because Livingston was gassed.

This year, Livingston is expected to win and no one will bat an eye when that happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, BOBKAT'88 said:

We shall find out about the batting of eyes in just a little bit.  The game will be close and it’s going to come down to who wants it more.  

Ok, I guess OF didn't want it enough, looking at the scoreboard.

Livingston is not a guaranteed scheduled win anymore. There's no shame to losing to the Lions. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Lions Pride 2021 said:

Ok, I guess OF didn't want it enough, looking at the scoreboard.

Livingston is not a guaranteed scheduled win anymore. There's no shame to losing to the Lions. 

 

 

Don't know where your going with this but I said it was going to be a close game and it was.  You are the one that implied OF couldn't compete with Livingston bc OF didn't pass the ball enough which we were very successful last night throwing the ball.  I'm very proud of the effort I saw on the field and I'm not ashamed of anything.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/11/2021 at 8:19 PM, BOBKAT'88 said:

Don't know where your going with this but I said it was going to be a close game and it was.  You are the one that implied OF couldn't compete with Livingston bc OF didn't pass the ball enough which we were very successful last night throwing the ball.  I'm very proud of the effort I saw on the field and I'm not ashamed of anything.  

You're the one that said it would come down to who wanted it more, which is a dumb statement.

Of course both teams want to win. Wanting to win has nothing to do with actually winning the game.

We would all like to win the lottery too.

Its a tired, lazy sports cliche that I wish would be retired, so that's why I'm picking on you! 

I wish yall the best of luck the rest of the way. But I was never worried about Livingston losing to y'all.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Lions Pride 2021 said:

You're the one that said it would come down to who wanted it more, which is a dumb statement.

Of course both teams want to win. Wanting to win has nothing to do with actually winning the game.

We would all like to win the lottery too.

Its a tired, lazy sports cliche that I wish would be retired, so that's why I'm picking on you! 

I wish yall the best of luck the rest of the way. But I was never worried about Livingston losing to y'all.

Speaking of dumb statements …..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,926
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined


  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...